Cargando…

Vaccines for preventing herpes zoster in older adults

BACKGROUND: Herpes zoster or, as it is commonly called, ‘shingles’ is a neurocutaneous disease characterised by the reactivation of varicella zoster virus (VZV), the virus that causes chickenpox, which is latent in the dorsal spinal ganglia when immunity to VZV declines. It is an extremely painful c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gagliardi, Ana M. Z., Silva, Brenda Nazaré Gomes, Torloni, Maria Regina, Soares, Bernardo Garcia de Oliveira
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10496737/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25055074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.20141324T1
_version_ 1785105166100332544
author Gagliardi, Ana M. Z.
Silva, Brenda Nazaré Gomes
Torloni, Maria Regina
Soares, Bernardo Garcia de Oliveira
author_facet Gagliardi, Ana M. Z.
Silva, Brenda Nazaré Gomes
Torloni, Maria Regina
Soares, Bernardo Garcia de Oliveira
author_sort Gagliardi, Ana M. Z.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Herpes zoster or, as it is commonly called, ‘shingles’ is a neurocutaneous disease characterised by the reactivation of varicella zoster virus (VZV), the virus that causes chickenpox, which is latent in the dorsal spinal ganglia when immunity to VZV declines. It is an extremely painful condition which can often last for many weeks or months, impairing the patient’s quality of life. The natural aging process is associated with a reduction of cellular immunity which predisposes to herpes zoster. Vaccination with an attenuated form of VZV activates specific T cell production, therefore avoiding viral reactivation. A herpes zoster vaccine with an active virus has been approved for clinical use among older adults by the Food and Drug Administration and has been tested in large populations. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of vaccination for preventing herpes zoster in older adults. METHODS: Search methods: We searched the following sources for relevant studies: CENTRAL 2012, Issue 7, MEDLINE (1948 to July week 1, 2012), EMBASE (2010 to July 2012), LILACS (1982 to July 2012) and CINAHL (1981 to July 2012). We also reviewed reference lists of identified trials and reviews for additional studies. Selection criteria: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs comparing zoster vaccine with placebo or no vaccine, to prevent herpes zoster in older adults (mean age > 60 years). Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently collected and analysed data using a data extraction form. They also carried out an assessment of risk of bias. MAIN RESULTS: We identified eight RCTs with a total of 52,269 participants. Three studies were classified at low risk of bias. The main outcomes on effectiveness and safety were extracted from one clinical trial with a low risk of bias. Four studies compared zoster vaccine versus placebo; one study compared high-potency zoster vaccine versus low-potency zoster vaccine; one study compared refrigerated zoster vaccine versus frozen zoster vaccine; one study compared live zoster vaccine versus inactivated zoster vaccine and one study compared zoster vaccine versus pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (pneumo 23). Confirmed cases of herpes zoster were less frequent in patients who received the vaccine than in those who received a placebo: risk ratio (RR) 0.49 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.43 to 0.56), with a risk difference (RD) of 2%, and number needed to treat to benefit (NNTB) of 50. Analyses according to age groups indicated a greater benefit in participants aged 60 to 69 years, RR 0.36 (95% CI 0.30 to 0.45) and in participants aged 70 years and over, RR 0.63 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.75). Vaccine-related systemic adverse effects were more frequent in the vaccinated group (RR 1.29, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.57, number needed to treat to harm (NNTH) = 100). The pooled data risk ratio for adverse effects for participants with one or more inoculation site adverse effect was RR 4.51 (95% CI 2.35 to 8.68), and the NNTH was 2.8 (95% CI 2.3 to 3.4). Side effects were more frequent in younger (60 to 69 years) than in older (70 years and over) participants. AUTHORS’ CONCLUSIONS: Herpes zoster vaccine is effective in preventing herpes zoster disease. Although vaccine benefits are larger in the younger age group (60 to 69 years), this is also the age group with more adverse events. In general, zoster vaccine is well tolerated; it produces few systemic adverse events and injection site adverse effects of mild to moderate intensity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10496737
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104967372023-09-13 Vaccines for preventing herpes zoster in older adults Gagliardi, Ana M. Z. Silva, Brenda Nazaré Gomes Torloni, Maria Regina Soares, Bernardo Garcia de Oliveira Sao Paulo Med J Cochrane Highlights BACKGROUND: Herpes zoster or, as it is commonly called, ‘shingles’ is a neurocutaneous disease characterised by the reactivation of varicella zoster virus (VZV), the virus that causes chickenpox, which is latent in the dorsal spinal ganglia when immunity to VZV declines. It is an extremely painful condition which can often last for many weeks or months, impairing the patient’s quality of life. The natural aging process is associated with a reduction of cellular immunity which predisposes to herpes zoster. Vaccination with an attenuated form of VZV activates specific T cell production, therefore avoiding viral reactivation. A herpes zoster vaccine with an active virus has been approved for clinical use among older adults by the Food and Drug Administration and has been tested in large populations. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of vaccination for preventing herpes zoster in older adults. METHODS: Search methods: We searched the following sources for relevant studies: CENTRAL 2012, Issue 7, MEDLINE (1948 to July week 1, 2012), EMBASE (2010 to July 2012), LILACS (1982 to July 2012) and CINAHL (1981 to July 2012). We also reviewed reference lists of identified trials and reviews for additional studies. Selection criteria: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs comparing zoster vaccine with placebo or no vaccine, to prevent herpes zoster in older adults (mean age > 60 years). Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently collected and analysed data using a data extraction form. They also carried out an assessment of risk of bias. MAIN RESULTS: We identified eight RCTs with a total of 52,269 participants. Three studies were classified at low risk of bias. The main outcomes on effectiveness and safety were extracted from one clinical trial with a low risk of bias. Four studies compared zoster vaccine versus placebo; one study compared high-potency zoster vaccine versus low-potency zoster vaccine; one study compared refrigerated zoster vaccine versus frozen zoster vaccine; one study compared live zoster vaccine versus inactivated zoster vaccine and one study compared zoster vaccine versus pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (pneumo 23). Confirmed cases of herpes zoster were less frequent in patients who received the vaccine than in those who received a placebo: risk ratio (RR) 0.49 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.43 to 0.56), with a risk difference (RD) of 2%, and number needed to treat to benefit (NNTB) of 50. Analyses according to age groups indicated a greater benefit in participants aged 60 to 69 years, RR 0.36 (95% CI 0.30 to 0.45) and in participants aged 70 years and over, RR 0.63 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.75). Vaccine-related systemic adverse effects were more frequent in the vaccinated group (RR 1.29, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.57, number needed to treat to harm (NNTH) = 100). The pooled data risk ratio for adverse effects for participants with one or more inoculation site adverse effect was RR 4.51 (95% CI 2.35 to 8.68), and the NNTH was 2.8 (95% CI 2.3 to 3.4). Side effects were more frequent in younger (60 to 69 years) than in older (70 years and over) participants. AUTHORS’ CONCLUSIONS: Herpes zoster vaccine is effective in preventing herpes zoster disease. Although vaccine benefits are larger in the younger age group (60 to 69 years), this is also the age group with more adverse events. In general, zoster vaccine is well tolerated; it produces few systemic adverse events and injection site adverse effects of mild to moderate intensity. Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM 2014-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10496737/ /pubmed/25055074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.20141324T1 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons license.
spellingShingle Cochrane Highlights
Gagliardi, Ana M. Z.
Silva, Brenda Nazaré Gomes
Torloni, Maria Regina
Soares, Bernardo Garcia de Oliveira
Vaccines for preventing herpes zoster in older adults
title Vaccines for preventing herpes zoster in older adults
title_full Vaccines for preventing herpes zoster in older adults
title_fullStr Vaccines for preventing herpes zoster in older adults
title_full_unstemmed Vaccines for preventing herpes zoster in older adults
title_short Vaccines for preventing herpes zoster in older adults
title_sort vaccines for preventing herpes zoster in older adults
topic Cochrane Highlights
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10496737/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25055074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.20141324T1
work_keys_str_mv AT gagliardianamz vaccinesforpreventingherpeszosterinolderadults
AT silvabrendanazaregomes vaccinesforpreventingherpeszosterinolderadults
AT torlonimariaregina vaccinesforpreventingherpeszosterinolderadults
AT soaresbernardogarciadeoliveira vaccinesforpreventingherpeszosterinolderadults