Cargando…
Risk for Surgical Team Hearing Loss With Vitrectomy
Purpose: To assess sound-level exposure during vitrectomy using 3 of the most common commercially available machines. Methods: This noninterventional cross-sectional study examined sound emission from the Constellation, Stellaris, and EVA vitrector systems. For each machine, a noise dosimeter was us...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10496806/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37706085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/24741264231172564 |
_version_ | 1785105178624524288 |
---|---|
author | Ruparelia, Sunil Orr, Samantha Choudhry, Netan Wong, Robert W. Smith, Corey A. Taylor, S. Mark Gupta, R. Rishi |
author_facet | Ruparelia, Sunil Orr, Samantha Choudhry, Netan Wong, Robert W. Smith, Corey A. Taylor, S. Mark Gupta, R. Rishi |
author_sort | Ruparelia, Sunil |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose: To assess sound-level exposure during vitrectomy using 3 of the most common commercially available machines. Methods: This noninterventional cross-sectional study examined sound emission from the Constellation, Stellaris, and EVA vitrector systems. For each machine, a noise dosimeter was used to measure the sound-level exposure of the surgeon during 3 surgical cases in which vitrectomy was performed. Sound levels associated with progressively increasing cut rates and vacuum pressures were also measured. Finally, sound measurements were taken during the use of various additional functions of each machine, including diathermy, laser, and extrusion. Sound levels were compared with occupational health guidelines in Canada and the United States. Results: The maximum sound level recorded during vitrectomy surgery was 88.2 dBA. The mean sound level during vitrectomy surgical cases ranged from 58.5 to 66.8 dBA. A strong positive linear correlation was found between the cut rate and sound level (r = 0.88-0.98) and the vacuum pressure and sound level (r = 0.83-0.97). This relationship was consistent across the 3 vitrector systems (P < .001). Conclusions: Noise exposure during vitrectomy procedures was acceptable but may be sufficient for surgical team activity interference, as described by World Health Organization recommendations. A strong correlation was found between the cut rate and noise exposure. If cut rates continue to increase, attention should be given to ensure that the resulting noise exposure does not threaten the hearing of vitreoretinal surgeons and the operating room staff. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10496806 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104968062023-09-13 Risk for Surgical Team Hearing Loss With Vitrectomy Ruparelia, Sunil Orr, Samantha Choudhry, Netan Wong, Robert W. Smith, Corey A. Taylor, S. Mark Gupta, R. Rishi J Vitreoretin Dis Original Manuscripts Purpose: To assess sound-level exposure during vitrectomy using 3 of the most common commercially available machines. Methods: This noninterventional cross-sectional study examined sound emission from the Constellation, Stellaris, and EVA vitrector systems. For each machine, a noise dosimeter was used to measure the sound-level exposure of the surgeon during 3 surgical cases in which vitrectomy was performed. Sound levels associated with progressively increasing cut rates and vacuum pressures were also measured. Finally, sound measurements were taken during the use of various additional functions of each machine, including diathermy, laser, and extrusion. Sound levels were compared with occupational health guidelines in Canada and the United States. Results: The maximum sound level recorded during vitrectomy surgery was 88.2 dBA. The mean sound level during vitrectomy surgical cases ranged from 58.5 to 66.8 dBA. A strong positive linear correlation was found between the cut rate and sound level (r = 0.88-0.98) and the vacuum pressure and sound level (r = 0.83-0.97). This relationship was consistent across the 3 vitrector systems (P < .001). Conclusions: Noise exposure during vitrectomy procedures was acceptable but may be sufficient for surgical team activity interference, as described by World Health Organization recommendations. A strong correlation was found between the cut rate and noise exposure. If cut rates continue to increase, attention should be given to ensure that the resulting noise exposure does not threaten the hearing of vitreoretinal surgeons and the operating room staff. SAGE Publications 2023-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10496806/ /pubmed/37706085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/24741264231172564 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Manuscripts Ruparelia, Sunil Orr, Samantha Choudhry, Netan Wong, Robert W. Smith, Corey A. Taylor, S. Mark Gupta, R. Rishi Risk for Surgical Team Hearing Loss With Vitrectomy |
title | Risk for Surgical Team Hearing Loss With Vitrectomy |
title_full | Risk for Surgical Team Hearing Loss With Vitrectomy |
title_fullStr | Risk for Surgical Team Hearing Loss With Vitrectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | Risk for Surgical Team Hearing Loss With Vitrectomy |
title_short | Risk for Surgical Team Hearing Loss With Vitrectomy |
title_sort | risk for surgical team hearing loss with vitrectomy |
topic | Original Manuscripts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10496806/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37706085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/24741264231172564 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rupareliasunil riskforsurgicalteamhearinglosswithvitrectomy AT orrsamantha riskforsurgicalteamhearinglosswithvitrectomy AT choudhrynetan riskforsurgicalteamhearinglosswithvitrectomy AT wongrobertw riskforsurgicalteamhearinglosswithvitrectomy AT smithcoreya riskforsurgicalteamhearinglosswithvitrectomy AT taylorsmark riskforsurgicalteamhearinglosswithvitrectomy AT guptarrishi riskforsurgicalteamhearinglosswithvitrectomy |