Cargando…

Risk for Surgical Team Hearing Loss With Vitrectomy

Purpose: To assess sound-level exposure during vitrectomy using 3 of the most common commercially available machines. Methods: This noninterventional cross-sectional study examined sound emission from the Constellation, Stellaris, and EVA vitrector systems. For each machine, a noise dosimeter was us...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ruparelia, Sunil, Orr, Samantha, Choudhry, Netan, Wong, Robert W., Smith, Corey A., Taylor, S. Mark, Gupta, R. Rishi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10496806/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37706085
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/24741264231172564
_version_ 1785105178624524288
author Ruparelia, Sunil
Orr, Samantha
Choudhry, Netan
Wong, Robert W.
Smith, Corey A.
Taylor, S. Mark
Gupta, R. Rishi
author_facet Ruparelia, Sunil
Orr, Samantha
Choudhry, Netan
Wong, Robert W.
Smith, Corey A.
Taylor, S. Mark
Gupta, R. Rishi
author_sort Ruparelia, Sunil
collection PubMed
description Purpose: To assess sound-level exposure during vitrectomy using 3 of the most common commercially available machines. Methods: This noninterventional cross-sectional study examined sound emission from the Constellation, Stellaris, and EVA vitrector systems. For each machine, a noise dosimeter was used to measure the sound-level exposure of the surgeon during 3 surgical cases in which vitrectomy was performed. Sound levels associated with progressively increasing cut rates and vacuum pressures were also measured. Finally, sound measurements were taken during the use of various additional functions of each machine, including diathermy, laser, and extrusion. Sound levels were compared with occupational health guidelines in Canada and the United States. Results: The maximum sound level recorded during vitrectomy surgery was 88.2 dBA. The mean sound level during vitrectomy surgical cases ranged from 58.5 to 66.8 dBA. A strong positive linear correlation was found between the cut rate and sound level (r = 0.88-0.98) and the vacuum pressure and sound level (r = 0.83-0.97). This relationship was consistent across the 3 vitrector systems (P < .001). Conclusions: Noise exposure during vitrectomy procedures was acceptable but may be sufficient for surgical team activity interference, as described by World Health Organization recommendations. A strong correlation was found between the cut rate and noise exposure. If cut rates continue to increase, attention should be given to ensure that the resulting noise exposure does not threaten the hearing of vitreoretinal surgeons and the operating room staff.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10496806
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104968062023-09-13 Risk for Surgical Team Hearing Loss With Vitrectomy Ruparelia, Sunil Orr, Samantha Choudhry, Netan Wong, Robert W. Smith, Corey A. Taylor, S. Mark Gupta, R. Rishi J Vitreoretin Dis Original Manuscripts Purpose: To assess sound-level exposure during vitrectomy using 3 of the most common commercially available machines. Methods: This noninterventional cross-sectional study examined sound emission from the Constellation, Stellaris, and EVA vitrector systems. For each machine, a noise dosimeter was used to measure the sound-level exposure of the surgeon during 3 surgical cases in which vitrectomy was performed. Sound levels associated with progressively increasing cut rates and vacuum pressures were also measured. Finally, sound measurements were taken during the use of various additional functions of each machine, including diathermy, laser, and extrusion. Sound levels were compared with occupational health guidelines in Canada and the United States. Results: The maximum sound level recorded during vitrectomy surgery was 88.2 dBA. The mean sound level during vitrectomy surgical cases ranged from 58.5 to 66.8 dBA. A strong positive linear correlation was found between the cut rate and sound level (r = 0.88-0.98) and the vacuum pressure and sound level (r = 0.83-0.97). This relationship was consistent across the 3 vitrector systems (P < .001). Conclusions: Noise exposure during vitrectomy procedures was acceptable but may be sufficient for surgical team activity interference, as described by World Health Organization recommendations. A strong correlation was found between the cut rate and noise exposure. If cut rates continue to increase, attention should be given to ensure that the resulting noise exposure does not threaten the hearing of vitreoretinal surgeons and the operating room staff. SAGE Publications 2023-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10496806/ /pubmed/37706085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/24741264231172564 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Manuscripts
Ruparelia, Sunil
Orr, Samantha
Choudhry, Netan
Wong, Robert W.
Smith, Corey A.
Taylor, S. Mark
Gupta, R. Rishi
Risk for Surgical Team Hearing Loss With Vitrectomy
title Risk for Surgical Team Hearing Loss With Vitrectomy
title_full Risk for Surgical Team Hearing Loss With Vitrectomy
title_fullStr Risk for Surgical Team Hearing Loss With Vitrectomy
title_full_unstemmed Risk for Surgical Team Hearing Loss With Vitrectomy
title_short Risk for Surgical Team Hearing Loss With Vitrectomy
title_sort risk for surgical team hearing loss with vitrectomy
topic Original Manuscripts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10496806/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37706085
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/24741264231172564
work_keys_str_mv AT rupareliasunil riskforsurgicalteamhearinglosswithvitrectomy
AT orrsamantha riskforsurgicalteamhearinglosswithvitrectomy
AT choudhrynetan riskforsurgicalteamhearinglosswithvitrectomy
AT wongrobertw riskforsurgicalteamhearinglosswithvitrectomy
AT smithcoreya riskforsurgicalteamhearinglosswithvitrectomy
AT taylorsmark riskforsurgicalteamhearinglosswithvitrectomy
AT guptarrishi riskforsurgicalteamhearinglosswithvitrectomy