Cargando…

Efficacy and Safety of Ciprofol Sedation in ICU Patients Undergoing Mechanical Ventilation: A Multicenter, Single-Blind, Randomized, Noninferiority Trial

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness and safety of ciprofol for sedating patients in ICUs who required mechanical ventilation (MV). DESIGN: A multicenter, single-blind, randomized, noninferiority trial. SETTING: Twenty-one centers across China from December 2020 to June 2021. PATIENTS: A total...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Yongjun, Peng, Zhiyong, Liu, Songqiao, Yu, Xiangyou, Zhu, Duming, Zhang, Linlin, Wen, Jianli, An, Youzhong, Zhan, Liying, Wang, Xiaochuang, Kang, Yan, Pan, Aijun, Yan, Jing, Zhang, Lina, Liu, Fengming, Zeng, Jun, Lin, Qinhan, Sun, Renhua, Yu, Jiangquan, Wang, Huaxue, Yao, Li, Chen, Chuanxi, Liu, Ning, Nie, Yao, Lyu, Jie, Wu, Kun, Wu, Jianfeng, Liu, Xiao, Guan, Xiangdong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10497206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37272947
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000005920
_version_ 1785105258902454272
author Liu, Yongjun
Peng, Zhiyong
Liu, Songqiao
Yu, Xiangyou
Zhu, Duming
Zhang, Linlin
Wen, Jianli
An, Youzhong
Zhan, Liying
Wang, Xiaochuang
Kang, Yan
Pan, Aijun
Yan, Jing
Zhang, Lina
Liu, Fengming
Zeng, Jun
Lin, Qinhan
Sun, Renhua
Yu, Jiangquan
Wang, Huaxue
Yao, Li
Chen, Chuanxi
Liu, Ning
Nie, Yao
Lyu, Jie
Wu, Kun
Wu, Jianfeng
Liu, Xiao
Guan, Xiangdong
author_facet Liu, Yongjun
Peng, Zhiyong
Liu, Songqiao
Yu, Xiangyou
Zhu, Duming
Zhang, Linlin
Wen, Jianli
An, Youzhong
Zhan, Liying
Wang, Xiaochuang
Kang, Yan
Pan, Aijun
Yan, Jing
Zhang, Lina
Liu, Fengming
Zeng, Jun
Lin, Qinhan
Sun, Renhua
Yu, Jiangquan
Wang, Huaxue
Yao, Li
Chen, Chuanxi
Liu, Ning
Nie, Yao
Lyu, Jie
Wu, Kun
Wu, Jianfeng
Liu, Xiao
Guan, Xiangdong
author_sort Liu, Yongjun
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness and safety of ciprofol for sedating patients in ICUs who required mechanical ventilation (MV). DESIGN: A multicenter, single-blind, randomized, noninferiority trial. SETTING: Twenty-one centers across China from December 2020 to June 2021. PATIENTS: A total of 135 ICU patients 18 to 80 years old with endotracheal intubation and undergoing MV, who were expected to require sedation for 6–24 hours. INTERVENTIONS: One hundred thirty-five ICU patients were randomly allocated into ciprofol (n = 90) and propofol (n = 45) groups in a 2:1 ratio. Ciprofol or propofol were IV infused at loading doses of 0.1 mg/kg or 0.5 mg/kg, respectively, over 4 minutes ± 30 seconds depending on the physical condition of each patient. Ciprofol or propofol were then immediately administered at an initial maintenance dose of 0.3 mg/kg/hr or 1.5 mg/kg/hr, to achieve the target sedation range of Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (+1 to –2). Besides, continuous IV remifentanil analgesia was administered (loading dose: 0.5–1 μg/kg, maintenance dose: 0.02–0.15 μg/kg/min). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of the 135 patients enrolled, 129 completed the study. The primary endpoint-sedation success rates of ciprofol and propofol groups were 97.7% versus 97.8% in the full analysis set (FAS) and were both 100% in per-protocol set (PPS). The noninferiority margin was set as 8% and confirmed with a lower limit of two-sided 95% CI for the inter-group difference of –5.98% and –4.32% in the FAS and PPS groups. Patients who received ciprofol had a longer recovery time (p = 0.003), but there were no differences in the remaining secondary endpoints (all p > 0.05). The occurrence rates of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) or drug-related TEAEs were not significantly different between the groups (all p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Ciprofol was well tolerated, with a noninferior sedation profile to propofol in Chinese ICU patients undergoing MV for a period of 6–24 hours.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10497206
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104972062023-09-13 Efficacy and Safety of Ciprofol Sedation in ICU Patients Undergoing Mechanical Ventilation: A Multicenter, Single-Blind, Randomized, Noninferiority Trial Liu, Yongjun Peng, Zhiyong Liu, Songqiao Yu, Xiangyou Zhu, Duming Zhang, Linlin Wen, Jianli An, Youzhong Zhan, Liying Wang, Xiaochuang Kang, Yan Pan, Aijun Yan, Jing Zhang, Lina Liu, Fengming Zeng, Jun Lin, Qinhan Sun, Renhua Yu, Jiangquan Wang, Huaxue Yao, Li Chen, Chuanxi Liu, Ning Nie, Yao Lyu, Jie Wu, Kun Wu, Jianfeng Liu, Xiao Guan, Xiangdong Crit Care Med Clinical Investigations OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness and safety of ciprofol for sedating patients in ICUs who required mechanical ventilation (MV). DESIGN: A multicenter, single-blind, randomized, noninferiority trial. SETTING: Twenty-one centers across China from December 2020 to June 2021. PATIENTS: A total of 135 ICU patients 18 to 80 years old with endotracheal intubation and undergoing MV, who were expected to require sedation for 6–24 hours. INTERVENTIONS: One hundred thirty-five ICU patients were randomly allocated into ciprofol (n = 90) and propofol (n = 45) groups in a 2:1 ratio. Ciprofol or propofol were IV infused at loading doses of 0.1 mg/kg or 0.5 mg/kg, respectively, over 4 minutes ± 30 seconds depending on the physical condition of each patient. Ciprofol or propofol were then immediately administered at an initial maintenance dose of 0.3 mg/kg/hr or 1.5 mg/kg/hr, to achieve the target sedation range of Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (+1 to –2). Besides, continuous IV remifentanil analgesia was administered (loading dose: 0.5–1 μg/kg, maintenance dose: 0.02–0.15 μg/kg/min). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of the 135 patients enrolled, 129 completed the study. The primary endpoint-sedation success rates of ciprofol and propofol groups were 97.7% versus 97.8% in the full analysis set (FAS) and were both 100% in per-protocol set (PPS). The noninferiority margin was set as 8% and confirmed with a lower limit of two-sided 95% CI for the inter-group difference of –5.98% and –4.32% in the FAS and PPS groups. Patients who received ciprofol had a longer recovery time (p = 0.003), but there were no differences in the remaining secondary endpoints (all p > 0.05). The occurrence rates of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) or drug-related TEAEs were not significantly different between the groups (all p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Ciprofol was well tolerated, with a noninferior sedation profile to propofol in Chinese ICU patients undergoing MV for a period of 6–24 hours. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-06-05 2023-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10497206/ /pubmed/37272947 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000005920 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Clinical Investigations
Liu, Yongjun
Peng, Zhiyong
Liu, Songqiao
Yu, Xiangyou
Zhu, Duming
Zhang, Linlin
Wen, Jianli
An, Youzhong
Zhan, Liying
Wang, Xiaochuang
Kang, Yan
Pan, Aijun
Yan, Jing
Zhang, Lina
Liu, Fengming
Zeng, Jun
Lin, Qinhan
Sun, Renhua
Yu, Jiangquan
Wang, Huaxue
Yao, Li
Chen, Chuanxi
Liu, Ning
Nie, Yao
Lyu, Jie
Wu, Kun
Wu, Jianfeng
Liu, Xiao
Guan, Xiangdong
Efficacy and Safety of Ciprofol Sedation in ICU Patients Undergoing Mechanical Ventilation: A Multicenter, Single-Blind, Randomized, Noninferiority Trial
title Efficacy and Safety of Ciprofol Sedation in ICU Patients Undergoing Mechanical Ventilation: A Multicenter, Single-Blind, Randomized, Noninferiority Trial
title_full Efficacy and Safety of Ciprofol Sedation in ICU Patients Undergoing Mechanical Ventilation: A Multicenter, Single-Blind, Randomized, Noninferiority Trial
title_fullStr Efficacy and Safety of Ciprofol Sedation in ICU Patients Undergoing Mechanical Ventilation: A Multicenter, Single-Blind, Randomized, Noninferiority Trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Safety of Ciprofol Sedation in ICU Patients Undergoing Mechanical Ventilation: A Multicenter, Single-Blind, Randomized, Noninferiority Trial
title_short Efficacy and Safety of Ciprofol Sedation in ICU Patients Undergoing Mechanical Ventilation: A Multicenter, Single-Blind, Randomized, Noninferiority Trial
title_sort efficacy and safety of ciprofol sedation in icu patients undergoing mechanical ventilation: a multicenter, single-blind, randomized, noninferiority trial
topic Clinical Investigations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10497206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37272947
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000005920
work_keys_str_mv AT liuyongjun efficacyandsafetyofciprofolsedationinicupatientsundergoingmechanicalventilationamulticentersingleblindrandomizednoninferioritytrial
AT pengzhiyong efficacyandsafetyofciprofolsedationinicupatientsundergoingmechanicalventilationamulticentersingleblindrandomizednoninferioritytrial
AT liusongqiao efficacyandsafetyofciprofolsedationinicupatientsundergoingmechanicalventilationamulticentersingleblindrandomizednoninferioritytrial
AT yuxiangyou efficacyandsafetyofciprofolsedationinicupatientsundergoingmechanicalventilationamulticentersingleblindrandomizednoninferioritytrial
AT zhuduming efficacyandsafetyofciprofolsedationinicupatientsundergoingmechanicalventilationamulticentersingleblindrandomizednoninferioritytrial
AT zhanglinlin efficacyandsafetyofciprofolsedationinicupatientsundergoingmechanicalventilationamulticentersingleblindrandomizednoninferioritytrial
AT wenjianli efficacyandsafetyofciprofolsedationinicupatientsundergoingmechanicalventilationamulticentersingleblindrandomizednoninferioritytrial
AT anyouzhong efficacyandsafetyofciprofolsedationinicupatientsundergoingmechanicalventilationamulticentersingleblindrandomizednoninferioritytrial
AT zhanliying efficacyandsafetyofciprofolsedationinicupatientsundergoingmechanicalventilationamulticentersingleblindrandomizednoninferioritytrial
AT wangxiaochuang efficacyandsafetyofciprofolsedationinicupatientsundergoingmechanicalventilationamulticentersingleblindrandomizednoninferioritytrial
AT kangyan efficacyandsafetyofciprofolsedationinicupatientsundergoingmechanicalventilationamulticentersingleblindrandomizednoninferioritytrial
AT panaijun efficacyandsafetyofciprofolsedationinicupatientsundergoingmechanicalventilationamulticentersingleblindrandomizednoninferioritytrial
AT yanjing efficacyandsafetyofciprofolsedationinicupatientsundergoingmechanicalventilationamulticentersingleblindrandomizednoninferioritytrial
AT zhanglina efficacyandsafetyofciprofolsedationinicupatientsundergoingmechanicalventilationamulticentersingleblindrandomizednoninferioritytrial
AT liufengming efficacyandsafetyofciprofolsedationinicupatientsundergoingmechanicalventilationamulticentersingleblindrandomizednoninferioritytrial
AT zengjun efficacyandsafetyofciprofolsedationinicupatientsundergoingmechanicalventilationamulticentersingleblindrandomizednoninferioritytrial
AT linqinhan efficacyandsafetyofciprofolsedationinicupatientsundergoingmechanicalventilationamulticentersingleblindrandomizednoninferioritytrial
AT sunrenhua efficacyandsafetyofciprofolsedationinicupatientsundergoingmechanicalventilationamulticentersingleblindrandomizednoninferioritytrial
AT yujiangquan efficacyandsafetyofciprofolsedationinicupatientsundergoingmechanicalventilationamulticentersingleblindrandomizednoninferioritytrial
AT wanghuaxue efficacyandsafetyofciprofolsedationinicupatientsundergoingmechanicalventilationamulticentersingleblindrandomizednoninferioritytrial
AT yaoli efficacyandsafetyofciprofolsedationinicupatientsundergoingmechanicalventilationamulticentersingleblindrandomizednoninferioritytrial
AT chenchuanxi efficacyandsafetyofciprofolsedationinicupatientsundergoingmechanicalventilationamulticentersingleblindrandomizednoninferioritytrial
AT liuning efficacyandsafetyofciprofolsedationinicupatientsundergoingmechanicalventilationamulticentersingleblindrandomizednoninferioritytrial
AT nieyao efficacyandsafetyofciprofolsedationinicupatientsundergoingmechanicalventilationamulticentersingleblindrandomizednoninferioritytrial
AT lyujie efficacyandsafetyofciprofolsedationinicupatientsundergoingmechanicalventilationamulticentersingleblindrandomizednoninferioritytrial
AT wukun efficacyandsafetyofciprofolsedationinicupatientsundergoingmechanicalventilationamulticentersingleblindrandomizednoninferioritytrial
AT wujianfeng efficacyandsafetyofciprofolsedationinicupatientsundergoingmechanicalventilationamulticentersingleblindrandomizednoninferioritytrial
AT liuxiao efficacyandsafetyofciprofolsedationinicupatientsundergoingmechanicalventilationamulticentersingleblindrandomizednoninferioritytrial
AT guanxiangdong efficacyandsafetyofciprofolsedationinicupatientsundergoingmechanicalventilationamulticentersingleblindrandomizednoninferioritytrial