Cargando…

Artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support for liver transplant evaluation and considerations about fairness: A qualitative study

BACKGROUND: The use of large-scale data and artificial intelligence (AI) to support complex transplantation decisions is in its infancy. Transplant candidate decision-making, which relies heavily on subjective assessment (ie, high variability), provides a ripe opportunity for AI-based clinical decis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Strauss, Alexandra T., Sidoti, Carolyn N., Sung, Hannah C., Jain, Vedant S., Lehmann, Harold, Purnell, Tanjala S., Jackson, John W., Malinsky, Daniel, Hamilton, James P., Garonzik-Wang, Jacqueline, Gray, Stephen H., Levan, Macey L., Hinson, Jeremiah S., Gurses, Ayse P., Gurakar, Ahmet, Segev, Dorry L., Levin, Scott
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10497243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37695082
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HC9.0000000000000239
_version_ 1785105263667183616
author Strauss, Alexandra T.
Sidoti, Carolyn N.
Sung, Hannah C.
Jain, Vedant S.
Lehmann, Harold
Purnell, Tanjala S.
Jackson, John W.
Malinsky, Daniel
Hamilton, James P.
Garonzik-Wang, Jacqueline
Gray, Stephen H.
Levan, Macey L.
Hinson, Jeremiah S.
Gurses, Ayse P.
Gurakar, Ahmet
Segev, Dorry L.
Levin, Scott
author_facet Strauss, Alexandra T.
Sidoti, Carolyn N.
Sung, Hannah C.
Jain, Vedant S.
Lehmann, Harold
Purnell, Tanjala S.
Jackson, John W.
Malinsky, Daniel
Hamilton, James P.
Garonzik-Wang, Jacqueline
Gray, Stephen H.
Levan, Macey L.
Hinson, Jeremiah S.
Gurses, Ayse P.
Gurakar, Ahmet
Segev, Dorry L.
Levin, Scott
author_sort Strauss, Alexandra T.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The use of large-scale data and artificial intelligence (AI) to support complex transplantation decisions is in its infancy. Transplant candidate decision-making, which relies heavily on subjective assessment (ie, high variability), provides a ripe opportunity for AI-based clinical decision support (CDS). However, AI-CDS for transplant applications must consider important concerns regarding fairness (ie, health equity). The objective of this study was to use human-centered design methods to elicit providers’ perceptions of AI-CDS for liver transplant listing decisions. METHODS: In this multicenter qualitative study conducted from December 2020 to July 2021, we performed semistructured interviews with 53 multidisciplinary liver transplant providers from 2 transplant centers. We used inductive coding and constant comparison analysis of interview data. RESULTS: Analysis yielded 6 themes important for the design of fair AI-CDS for liver transplant listing decisions: (1) transparency in the creators behind the AI-CDS and their motivations; (2) understanding how the AI-CDS uses data to support recommendations (ie, interpretability); (3) acknowledgment that AI-CDS could mitigate emotions and biases; (4) AI-CDS as a member of the transplant team, not a replacement; (5) identifying patient resource needs; and (6) including the patient’s role in the AI-CDS. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, providers interviewed were cautiously optimistic about the potential for AI-CDS to improve clinical and equitable outcomes for patients. These findings can guide multidisciplinary developers in the design and implementation of AI-CDS that deliberately considers health equity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10497243
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104972432023-09-13 Artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support for liver transplant evaluation and considerations about fairness: A qualitative study Strauss, Alexandra T. Sidoti, Carolyn N. Sung, Hannah C. Jain, Vedant S. Lehmann, Harold Purnell, Tanjala S. Jackson, John W. Malinsky, Daniel Hamilton, James P. Garonzik-Wang, Jacqueline Gray, Stephen H. Levan, Macey L. Hinson, Jeremiah S. Gurses, Ayse P. Gurakar, Ahmet Segev, Dorry L. Levin, Scott Hepatol Commun Original Article BACKGROUND: The use of large-scale data and artificial intelligence (AI) to support complex transplantation decisions is in its infancy. Transplant candidate decision-making, which relies heavily on subjective assessment (ie, high variability), provides a ripe opportunity for AI-based clinical decision support (CDS). However, AI-CDS for transplant applications must consider important concerns regarding fairness (ie, health equity). The objective of this study was to use human-centered design methods to elicit providers’ perceptions of AI-CDS for liver transplant listing decisions. METHODS: In this multicenter qualitative study conducted from December 2020 to July 2021, we performed semistructured interviews with 53 multidisciplinary liver transplant providers from 2 transplant centers. We used inductive coding and constant comparison analysis of interview data. RESULTS: Analysis yielded 6 themes important for the design of fair AI-CDS for liver transplant listing decisions: (1) transparency in the creators behind the AI-CDS and their motivations; (2) understanding how the AI-CDS uses data to support recommendations (ie, interpretability); (3) acknowledgment that AI-CDS could mitigate emotions and biases; (4) AI-CDS as a member of the transplant team, not a replacement; (5) identifying patient resource needs; and (6) including the patient’s role in the AI-CDS. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, providers interviewed were cautiously optimistic about the potential for AI-CDS to improve clinical and equitable outcomes for patients. These findings can guide multidisciplinary developers in the design and implementation of AI-CDS that deliberately considers health equity. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10497243/ /pubmed/37695082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HC9.0000000000000239 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Article
Strauss, Alexandra T.
Sidoti, Carolyn N.
Sung, Hannah C.
Jain, Vedant S.
Lehmann, Harold
Purnell, Tanjala S.
Jackson, John W.
Malinsky, Daniel
Hamilton, James P.
Garonzik-Wang, Jacqueline
Gray, Stephen H.
Levan, Macey L.
Hinson, Jeremiah S.
Gurses, Ayse P.
Gurakar, Ahmet
Segev, Dorry L.
Levin, Scott
Artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support for liver transplant evaluation and considerations about fairness: A qualitative study
title Artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support for liver transplant evaluation and considerations about fairness: A qualitative study
title_full Artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support for liver transplant evaluation and considerations about fairness: A qualitative study
title_fullStr Artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support for liver transplant evaluation and considerations about fairness: A qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support for liver transplant evaluation and considerations about fairness: A qualitative study
title_short Artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support for liver transplant evaluation and considerations about fairness: A qualitative study
title_sort artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support for liver transplant evaluation and considerations about fairness: a qualitative study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10497243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37695082
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HC9.0000000000000239
work_keys_str_mv AT straussalexandrat artificialintelligencebasedclinicaldecisionsupportforlivertransplantevaluationandconsiderationsaboutfairnessaqualitativestudy
AT sidoticarolynn artificialintelligencebasedclinicaldecisionsupportforlivertransplantevaluationandconsiderationsaboutfairnessaqualitativestudy
AT sunghannahc artificialintelligencebasedclinicaldecisionsupportforlivertransplantevaluationandconsiderationsaboutfairnessaqualitativestudy
AT jainvedants artificialintelligencebasedclinicaldecisionsupportforlivertransplantevaluationandconsiderationsaboutfairnessaqualitativestudy
AT lehmannharold artificialintelligencebasedclinicaldecisionsupportforlivertransplantevaluationandconsiderationsaboutfairnessaqualitativestudy
AT purnelltanjalas artificialintelligencebasedclinicaldecisionsupportforlivertransplantevaluationandconsiderationsaboutfairnessaqualitativestudy
AT jacksonjohnw artificialintelligencebasedclinicaldecisionsupportforlivertransplantevaluationandconsiderationsaboutfairnessaqualitativestudy
AT malinskydaniel artificialintelligencebasedclinicaldecisionsupportforlivertransplantevaluationandconsiderationsaboutfairnessaqualitativestudy
AT hamiltonjamesp artificialintelligencebasedclinicaldecisionsupportforlivertransplantevaluationandconsiderationsaboutfairnessaqualitativestudy
AT garonzikwangjacqueline artificialintelligencebasedclinicaldecisionsupportforlivertransplantevaluationandconsiderationsaboutfairnessaqualitativestudy
AT graystephenh artificialintelligencebasedclinicaldecisionsupportforlivertransplantevaluationandconsiderationsaboutfairnessaqualitativestudy
AT levanmaceyl artificialintelligencebasedclinicaldecisionsupportforlivertransplantevaluationandconsiderationsaboutfairnessaqualitativestudy
AT hinsonjeremiahs artificialintelligencebasedclinicaldecisionsupportforlivertransplantevaluationandconsiderationsaboutfairnessaqualitativestudy
AT gursesaysep artificialintelligencebasedclinicaldecisionsupportforlivertransplantevaluationandconsiderationsaboutfairnessaqualitativestudy
AT gurakarahmet artificialintelligencebasedclinicaldecisionsupportforlivertransplantevaluationandconsiderationsaboutfairnessaqualitativestudy
AT segevdorryl artificialintelligencebasedclinicaldecisionsupportforlivertransplantevaluationandconsiderationsaboutfairnessaqualitativestudy
AT levinscott artificialintelligencebasedclinicaldecisionsupportforlivertransplantevaluationandconsiderationsaboutfairnessaqualitativestudy