Cargando…
Artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support for liver transplant evaluation and considerations about fairness: A qualitative study
BACKGROUND: The use of large-scale data and artificial intelligence (AI) to support complex transplantation decisions is in its infancy. Transplant candidate decision-making, which relies heavily on subjective assessment (ie, high variability), provides a ripe opportunity for AI-based clinical decis...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10497243/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37695082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HC9.0000000000000239 |
_version_ | 1785105263667183616 |
---|---|
author | Strauss, Alexandra T. Sidoti, Carolyn N. Sung, Hannah C. Jain, Vedant S. Lehmann, Harold Purnell, Tanjala S. Jackson, John W. Malinsky, Daniel Hamilton, James P. Garonzik-Wang, Jacqueline Gray, Stephen H. Levan, Macey L. Hinson, Jeremiah S. Gurses, Ayse P. Gurakar, Ahmet Segev, Dorry L. Levin, Scott |
author_facet | Strauss, Alexandra T. Sidoti, Carolyn N. Sung, Hannah C. Jain, Vedant S. Lehmann, Harold Purnell, Tanjala S. Jackson, John W. Malinsky, Daniel Hamilton, James P. Garonzik-Wang, Jacqueline Gray, Stephen H. Levan, Macey L. Hinson, Jeremiah S. Gurses, Ayse P. Gurakar, Ahmet Segev, Dorry L. Levin, Scott |
author_sort | Strauss, Alexandra T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The use of large-scale data and artificial intelligence (AI) to support complex transplantation decisions is in its infancy. Transplant candidate decision-making, which relies heavily on subjective assessment (ie, high variability), provides a ripe opportunity for AI-based clinical decision support (CDS). However, AI-CDS for transplant applications must consider important concerns regarding fairness (ie, health equity). The objective of this study was to use human-centered design methods to elicit providers’ perceptions of AI-CDS for liver transplant listing decisions. METHODS: In this multicenter qualitative study conducted from December 2020 to July 2021, we performed semistructured interviews with 53 multidisciplinary liver transplant providers from 2 transplant centers. We used inductive coding and constant comparison analysis of interview data. RESULTS: Analysis yielded 6 themes important for the design of fair AI-CDS for liver transplant listing decisions: (1) transparency in the creators behind the AI-CDS and their motivations; (2) understanding how the AI-CDS uses data to support recommendations (ie, interpretability); (3) acknowledgment that AI-CDS could mitigate emotions and biases; (4) AI-CDS as a member of the transplant team, not a replacement; (5) identifying patient resource needs; and (6) including the patient’s role in the AI-CDS. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, providers interviewed were cautiously optimistic about the potential for AI-CDS to improve clinical and equitable outcomes for patients. These findings can guide multidisciplinary developers in the design and implementation of AI-CDS that deliberately considers health equity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10497243 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104972432023-09-13 Artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support for liver transplant evaluation and considerations about fairness: A qualitative study Strauss, Alexandra T. Sidoti, Carolyn N. Sung, Hannah C. Jain, Vedant S. Lehmann, Harold Purnell, Tanjala S. Jackson, John W. Malinsky, Daniel Hamilton, James P. Garonzik-Wang, Jacqueline Gray, Stephen H. Levan, Macey L. Hinson, Jeremiah S. Gurses, Ayse P. Gurakar, Ahmet Segev, Dorry L. Levin, Scott Hepatol Commun Original Article BACKGROUND: The use of large-scale data and artificial intelligence (AI) to support complex transplantation decisions is in its infancy. Transplant candidate decision-making, which relies heavily on subjective assessment (ie, high variability), provides a ripe opportunity for AI-based clinical decision support (CDS). However, AI-CDS for transplant applications must consider important concerns regarding fairness (ie, health equity). The objective of this study was to use human-centered design methods to elicit providers’ perceptions of AI-CDS for liver transplant listing decisions. METHODS: In this multicenter qualitative study conducted from December 2020 to July 2021, we performed semistructured interviews with 53 multidisciplinary liver transplant providers from 2 transplant centers. We used inductive coding and constant comparison analysis of interview data. RESULTS: Analysis yielded 6 themes important for the design of fair AI-CDS for liver transplant listing decisions: (1) transparency in the creators behind the AI-CDS and their motivations; (2) understanding how the AI-CDS uses data to support recommendations (ie, interpretability); (3) acknowledgment that AI-CDS could mitigate emotions and biases; (4) AI-CDS as a member of the transplant team, not a replacement; (5) identifying patient resource needs; and (6) including the patient’s role in the AI-CDS. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, providers interviewed were cautiously optimistic about the potential for AI-CDS to improve clinical and equitable outcomes for patients. These findings can guide multidisciplinary developers in the design and implementation of AI-CDS that deliberately considers health equity. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10497243/ /pubmed/37695082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HC9.0000000000000239 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Original Article Strauss, Alexandra T. Sidoti, Carolyn N. Sung, Hannah C. Jain, Vedant S. Lehmann, Harold Purnell, Tanjala S. Jackson, John W. Malinsky, Daniel Hamilton, James P. Garonzik-Wang, Jacqueline Gray, Stephen H. Levan, Macey L. Hinson, Jeremiah S. Gurses, Ayse P. Gurakar, Ahmet Segev, Dorry L. Levin, Scott Artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support for liver transplant evaluation and considerations about fairness: A qualitative study |
title | Artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support for liver transplant evaluation and considerations about fairness: A qualitative study |
title_full | Artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support for liver transplant evaluation and considerations about fairness: A qualitative study |
title_fullStr | Artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support for liver transplant evaluation and considerations about fairness: A qualitative study |
title_full_unstemmed | Artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support for liver transplant evaluation and considerations about fairness: A qualitative study |
title_short | Artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support for liver transplant evaluation and considerations about fairness: A qualitative study |
title_sort | artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support for liver transplant evaluation and considerations about fairness: a qualitative study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10497243/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37695082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HC9.0000000000000239 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT straussalexandrat artificialintelligencebasedclinicaldecisionsupportforlivertransplantevaluationandconsiderationsaboutfairnessaqualitativestudy AT sidoticarolynn artificialintelligencebasedclinicaldecisionsupportforlivertransplantevaluationandconsiderationsaboutfairnessaqualitativestudy AT sunghannahc artificialintelligencebasedclinicaldecisionsupportforlivertransplantevaluationandconsiderationsaboutfairnessaqualitativestudy AT jainvedants artificialintelligencebasedclinicaldecisionsupportforlivertransplantevaluationandconsiderationsaboutfairnessaqualitativestudy AT lehmannharold artificialintelligencebasedclinicaldecisionsupportforlivertransplantevaluationandconsiderationsaboutfairnessaqualitativestudy AT purnelltanjalas artificialintelligencebasedclinicaldecisionsupportforlivertransplantevaluationandconsiderationsaboutfairnessaqualitativestudy AT jacksonjohnw artificialintelligencebasedclinicaldecisionsupportforlivertransplantevaluationandconsiderationsaboutfairnessaqualitativestudy AT malinskydaniel artificialintelligencebasedclinicaldecisionsupportforlivertransplantevaluationandconsiderationsaboutfairnessaqualitativestudy AT hamiltonjamesp artificialintelligencebasedclinicaldecisionsupportforlivertransplantevaluationandconsiderationsaboutfairnessaqualitativestudy AT garonzikwangjacqueline artificialintelligencebasedclinicaldecisionsupportforlivertransplantevaluationandconsiderationsaboutfairnessaqualitativestudy AT graystephenh artificialintelligencebasedclinicaldecisionsupportforlivertransplantevaluationandconsiderationsaboutfairnessaqualitativestudy AT levanmaceyl artificialintelligencebasedclinicaldecisionsupportforlivertransplantevaluationandconsiderationsaboutfairnessaqualitativestudy AT hinsonjeremiahs artificialintelligencebasedclinicaldecisionsupportforlivertransplantevaluationandconsiderationsaboutfairnessaqualitativestudy AT gursesaysep artificialintelligencebasedclinicaldecisionsupportforlivertransplantevaluationandconsiderationsaboutfairnessaqualitativestudy AT gurakarahmet artificialintelligencebasedclinicaldecisionsupportforlivertransplantevaluationandconsiderationsaboutfairnessaqualitativestudy AT segevdorryl artificialintelligencebasedclinicaldecisionsupportforlivertransplantevaluationandconsiderationsaboutfairnessaqualitativestudy AT levinscott artificialintelligencebasedclinicaldecisionsupportforlivertransplantevaluationandconsiderationsaboutfairnessaqualitativestudy |