Cargando…
QPOLE: A Quick, Simple, and Cheap Alternative for POLE Sequencing in Endometrial Cancer by Multiplex Genotyping Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction
PURPOSE: Detection of 11 pathogenic variants in the POLE gene in endometrial cancer (EC) is critically important to identify women with a good prognosis and reduce overtreatment. Currently, POLE status is determined by DNA sequencing, which can be expensive, relatively time-consuming, and unavailabl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10497260/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37229628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/GO.22.00384 |
_version_ | 1785105267134824448 |
---|---|
author | Van den Heerik, Anne Sophie V.M. Ter Haar, Natalja T. Vermij, Lisa Jobsen, Jan J. Brinkhuis, Mariel Roothaan, Suzan M. Leon-Castillo, Alicia Ortoft, Gitte Hogdall, Estrid Hogdall, Claus Van Wezel, Tom Lutgens, Ludy C.H.W. Haverkort, Marie A.D. Khattra, Jas McAlpine, Jessica N. Creutzberg, Carien L. Smit, Vincent T.H.B.M. Gilks, C. Blake Horeweg, Nanda Bosse, Tjalling |
author_facet | Van den Heerik, Anne Sophie V.M. Ter Haar, Natalja T. Vermij, Lisa Jobsen, Jan J. Brinkhuis, Mariel Roothaan, Suzan M. Leon-Castillo, Alicia Ortoft, Gitte Hogdall, Estrid Hogdall, Claus Van Wezel, Tom Lutgens, Ludy C.H.W. Haverkort, Marie A.D. Khattra, Jas McAlpine, Jessica N. Creutzberg, Carien L. Smit, Vincent T.H.B.M. Gilks, C. Blake Horeweg, Nanda Bosse, Tjalling |
author_sort | Van den Heerik, Anne Sophie V.M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Detection of 11 pathogenic variants in the POLE gene in endometrial cancer (EC) is critically important to identify women with a good prognosis and reduce overtreatment. Currently, POLE status is determined by DNA sequencing, which can be expensive, relatively time-consuming, and unavailable in hospitals without specialized equipment and personnel. This may hamper the implementation of POLE-testing in clinical practice. To overcome this, we developed and validated a rapid, low-cost POLE hotspot test by a quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assay, QPOLE. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Primer and fluorescence-labeled 5′-nuclease probe sequences of the 11 established pathogenic POLE mutations were designed. Three assays, QPOLE-frequent for the most common mutations and QPOLE-rare-1 and QPOLE-rare-2 for the rare variants, were developed and optimized using DNA extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissues. The simplicity of the design enables POLE status assessment within 4-6 hours after DNA isolation. An interlaboratory external validation study was performed to determine the practical feasibility of this assay. RESULTS: Cutoffs for POLE wild-type, POLE-mutant, equivocal, and failed results were predefined on the basis of a subset of POLE mutants and POLE wild-types for the internal and external validation. For equivocal cases, additional DNA sequencing is recommended. Performance in 282 EC cases, of which 99 were POLE-mutated, demonstrated an overall accuracy of 98.6% (95% CI, 97.2 to 99.9), a sensitivity of 95.2% (95% CI, 90.7 to 99.8), and a specificity of 100%. After DNA sequencing of 8.8% equivocal cases, the final sensitivity and specificity were 96.0% (95% CI, 92.1 to 99.8) and 100%. External validation confirmed feasibility and accuracy. CONCLUSION: QPOLE is a qPCR assay that is a quick, simple, and reliable alternative for DNA sequencing. QPOLE detects all pathogenic variants in the exonuclease domain of the POLE gene. QPOLE will make low-cost POLE-testing available for all women with EC around the globe. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10497260 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104972602023-09-13 QPOLE: A Quick, Simple, and Cheap Alternative for POLE Sequencing in Endometrial Cancer by Multiplex Genotyping Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction Van den Heerik, Anne Sophie V.M. Ter Haar, Natalja T. Vermij, Lisa Jobsen, Jan J. Brinkhuis, Mariel Roothaan, Suzan M. Leon-Castillo, Alicia Ortoft, Gitte Hogdall, Estrid Hogdall, Claus Van Wezel, Tom Lutgens, Ludy C.H.W. Haverkort, Marie A.D. Khattra, Jas McAlpine, Jessica N. Creutzberg, Carien L. Smit, Vincent T.H.B.M. Gilks, C. Blake Horeweg, Nanda Bosse, Tjalling JCO Glob Oncol ORIGINAL REPORTS PURPOSE: Detection of 11 pathogenic variants in the POLE gene in endometrial cancer (EC) is critically important to identify women with a good prognosis and reduce overtreatment. Currently, POLE status is determined by DNA sequencing, which can be expensive, relatively time-consuming, and unavailable in hospitals without specialized equipment and personnel. This may hamper the implementation of POLE-testing in clinical practice. To overcome this, we developed and validated a rapid, low-cost POLE hotspot test by a quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assay, QPOLE. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Primer and fluorescence-labeled 5′-nuclease probe sequences of the 11 established pathogenic POLE mutations were designed. Three assays, QPOLE-frequent for the most common mutations and QPOLE-rare-1 and QPOLE-rare-2 for the rare variants, were developed and optimized using DNA extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissues. The simplicity of the design enables POLE status assessment within 4-6 hours after DNA isolation. An interlaboratory external validation study was performed to determine the practical feasibility of this assay. RESULTS: Cutoffs for POLE wild-type, POLE-mutant, equivocal, and failed results were predefined on the basis of a subset of POLE mutants and POLE wild-types for the internal and external validation. For equivocal cases, additional DNA sequencing is recommended. Performance in 282 EC cases, of which 99 were POLE-mutated, demonstrated an overall accuracy of 98.6% (95% CI, 97.2 to 99.9), a sensitivity of 95.2% (95% CI, 90.7 to 99.8), and a specificity of 100%. After DNA sequencing of 8.8% equivocal cases, the final sensitivity and specificity were 96.0% (95% CI, 92.1 to 99.8) and 100%. External validation confirmed feasibility and accuracy. CONCLUSION: QPOLE is a qPCR assay that is a quick, simple, and reliable alternative for DNA sequencing. QPOLE detects all pathogenic variants in the exonuclease domain of the POLE gene. QPOLE will make low-cost POLE-testing available for all women with EC around the globe. Wolters Kluwer Health 2023-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10497260/ /pubmed/37229628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/GO.22.00384 Text en © 2023 by American Society of Clinical Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | ORIGINAL REPORTS Van den Heerik, Anne Sophie V.M. Ter Haar, Natalja T. Vermij, Lisa Jobsen, Jan J. Brinkhuis, Mariel Roothaan, Suzan M. Leon-Castillo, Alicia Ortoft, Gitte Hogdall, Estrid Hogdall, Claus Van Wezel, Tom Lutgens, Ludy C.H.W. Haverkort, Marie A.D. Khattra, Jas McAlpine, Jessica N. Creutzberg, Carien L. Smit, Vincent T.H.B.M. Gilks, C. Blake Horeweg, Nanda Bosse, Tjalling QPOLE: A Quick, Simple, and Cheap Alternative for POLE Sequencing in Endometrial Cancer by Multiplex Genotyping Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction |
title | QPOLE: A Quick, Simple, and Cheap Alternative for POLE Sequencing in Endometrial Cancer by Multiplex Genotyping Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction |
title_full | QPOLE: A Quick, Simple, and Cheap Alternative for POLE Sequencing in Endometrial Cancer by Multiplex Genotyping Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction |
title_fullStr | QPOLE: A Quick, Simple, and Cheap Alternative for POLE Sequencing in Endometrial Cancer by Multiplex Genotyping Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction |
title_full_unstemmed | QPOLE: A Quick, Simple, and Cheap Alternative for POLE Sequencing in Endometrial Cancer by Multiplex Genotyping Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction |
title_short | QPOLE: A Quick, Simple, and Cheap Alternative for POLE Sequencing in Endometrial Cancer by Multiplex Genotyping Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction |
title_sort | qpole: a quick, simple, and cheap alternative for pole sequencing in endometrial cancer by multiplex genotyping quantitative polymerase chain reaction |
topic | ORIGINAL REPORTS |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10497260/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37229628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/GO.22.00384 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vandenheerikannesophievm qpoleaquicksimpleandcheapalternativeforpolesequencinginendometrialcancerbymultiplexgenotypingquantitativepolymerasechainreaction AT terhaarnataljat qpoleaquicksimpleandcheapalternativeforpolesequencinginendometrialcancerbymultiplexgenotypingquantitativepolymerasechainreaction AT vermijlisa qpoleaquicksimpleandcheapalternativeforpolesequencinginendometrialcancerbymultiplexgenotypingquantitativepolymerasechainreaction AT jobsenjanj qpoleaquicksimpleandcheapalternativeforpolesequencinginendometrialcancerbymultiplexgenotypingquantitativepolymerasechainreaction AT brinkhuismariel qpoleaquicksimpleandcheapalternativeforpolesequencinginendometrialcancerbymultiplexgenotypingquantitativepolymerasechainreaction AT roothaansuzanm qpoleaquicksimpleandcheapalternativeforpolesequencinginendometrialcancerbymultiplexgenotypingquantitativepolymerasechainreaction AT leoncastilloalicia qpoleaquicksimpleandcheapalternativeforpolesequencinginendometrialcancerbymultiplexgenotypingquantitativepolymerasechainreaction AT ortoftgitte qpoleaquicksimpleandcheapalternativeforpolesequencinginendometrialcancerbymultiplexgenotypingquantitativepolymerasechainreaction AT hogdallestrid qpoleaquicksimpleandcheapalternativeforpolesequencinginendometrialcancerbymultiplexgenotypingquantitativepolymerasechainreaction AT hogdallclaus qpoleaquicksimpleandcheapalternativeforpolesequencinginendometrialcancerbymultiplexgenotypingquantitativepolymerasechainreaction AT vanwezeltom qpoleaquicksimpleandcheapalternativeforpolesequencinginendometrialcancerbymultiplexgenotypingquantitativepolymerasechainreaction AT lutgensludychw qpoleaquicksimpleandcheapalternativeforpolesequencinginendometrialcancerbymultiplexgenotypingquantitativepolymerasechainreaction AT haverkortmariead qpoleaquicksimpleandcheapalternativeforpolesequencinginendometrialcancerbymultiplexgenotypingquantitativepolymerasechainreaction AT khattrajas qpoleaquicksimpleandcheapalternativeforpolesequencinginendometrialcancerbymultiplexgenotypingquantitativepolymerasechainreaction AT mcalpinejessican qpoleaquicksimpleandcheapalternativeforpolesequencinginendometrialcancerbymultiplexgenotypingquantitativepolymerasechainreaction AT creutzbergcarienl qpoleaquicksimpleandcheapalternativeforpolesequencinginendometrialcancerbymultiplexgenotypingquantitativepolymerasechainreaction AT smitvincentthbm qpoleaquicksimpleandcheapalternativeforpolesequencinginendometrialcancerbymultiplexgenotypingquantitativepolymerasechainreaction AT gilkscblake qpoleaquicksimpleandcheapalternativeforpolesequencinginendometrialcancerbymultiplexgenotypingquantitativepolymerasechainreaction AT horewegnanda qpoleaquicksimpleandcheapalternativeforpolesequencinginendometrialcancerbymultiplexgenotypingquantitativepolymerasechainreaction AT bossetjalling qpoleaquicksimpleandcheapalternativeforpolesequencinginendometrialcancerbymultiplexgenotypingquantitativepolymerasechainreaction |