Cargando…

Robot-assisted implantation of additively manufactured patient-specific orthopaedic implants: evaluation in a sheep model

PURPOSE: Bone tumours must be surgically excised in one piece with a margin of healthy tissue. The unique nature of each bone tumour case is well suited to the use of patient-specific implants, with additive manufacturing allowing production of highly complex geometries. This work represents the fir...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Williamson, Tom, Ryan, Stewart, Buehner, Ulrich, Sweeney, Zac, Hill, Dave, Lozanovski, Bill, Kastrati, Endri, Namvar, Arman, Beths, Thierry, Shidid, Darpan, Blanchard, Romane, Fox, Kate, Leary, Martin, Choong, Peter, Brandt, Milan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10497442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36859520
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-023-02848-8
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: Bone tumours must be surgically excised in one piece with a margin of healthy tissue. The unique nature of each bone tumour case is well suited to the use of patient-specific implants, with additive manufacturing allowing production of highly complex geometries. This work represents the first assessment of the combination of surgical robotics and patient-specific additively manufactured implants. METHODS: The development and evaluation of a robotic system for bone tumour excision, capable of milling complex osteotomy paths, is described. The developed system was evaluated as part of an animal trial on 24 adult male sheep, in which robotic bone excision of the distal femur was followed by placement of patient-specific implants with operative time evaluated. Assessment of implant placement accuracy was completed based on post-operative CT scans. RESULTS: A mean overall implant position error of 1.05 ± 0.53 mm was achieved, in combination with a mean orientation error of 2.38 ± 0.98°. A mean procedure time (from access to implantation, excluding opening and closing) of 89.3 ± 25.25 min was observed, with recorded surgical time between 58 and 133 min, with this approximately evenly divided between robotic (43.9 ± 15.32) and implant-based (45.4 ± 18.97) tasks. CONCLUSIONS: This work demonstrates the ability for robotics to achieve repeatable and precise removal of complex bone volumes of the type that would allow en bloc removal of a bone tumour. These robotically created volumes can be precisely filled with additively manufactured patient-specific implants, with minimal gap between cut surface and implant interface.