Cargando…

Robot-assisted implantation of additively manufactured patient-specific orthopaedic implants: evaluation in a sheep model

PURPOSE: Bone tumours must be surgically excised in one piece with a margin of healthy tissue. The unique nature of each bone tumour case is well suited to the use of patient-specific implants, with additive manufacturing allowing production of highly complex geometries. This work represents the fir...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Williamson, Tom, Ryan, Stewart, Buehner, Ulrich, Sweeney, Zac, Hill, Dave, Lozanovski, Bill, Kastrati, Endri, Namvar, Arman, Beths, Thierry, Shidid, Darpan, Blanchard, Romane, Fox, Kate, Leary, Martin, Choong, Peter, Brandt, Milan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10497442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36859520
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-023-02848-8
_version_ 1785105305219104768
author Williamson, Tom
Ryan, Stewart
Buehner, Ulrich
Sweeney, Zac
Hill, Dave
Lozanovski, Bill
Kastrati, Endri
Namvar, Arman
Beths, Thierry
Shidid, Darpan
Blanchard, Romane
Fox, Kate
Leary, Martin
Choong, Peter
Brandt, Milan
author_facet Williamson, Tom
Ryan, Stewart
Buehner, Ulrich
Sweeney, Zac
Hill, Dave
Lozanovski, Bill
Kastrati, Endri
Namvar, Arman
Beths, Thierry
Shidid, Darpan
Blanchard, Romane
Fox, Kate
Leary, Martin
Choong, Peter
Brandt, Milan
author_sort Williamson, Tom
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Bone tumours must be surgically excised in one piece with a margin of healthy tissue. The unique nature of each bone tumour case is well suited to the use of patient-specific implants, with additive manufacturing allowing production of highly complex geometries. This work represents the first assessment of the combination of surgical robotics and patient-specific additively manufactured implants. METHODS: The development and evaluation of a robotic system for bone tumour excision, capable of milling complex osteotomy paths, is described. The developed system was evaluated as part of an animal trial on 24 adult male sheep, in which robotic bone excision of the distal femur was followed by placement of patient-specific implants with operative time evaluated. Assessment of implant placement accuracy was completed based on post-operative CT scans. RESULTS: A mean overall implant position error of 1.05 ± 0.53 mm was achieved, in combination with a mean orientation error of 2.38 ± 0.98°. A mean procedure time (from access to implantation, excluding opening and closing) of 89.3 ± 25.25 min was observed, with recorded surgical time between 58 and 133 min, with this approximately evenly divided between robotic (43.9 ± 15.32) and implant-based (45.4 ± 18.97) tasks. CONCLUSIONS: This work demonstrates the ability for robotics to achieve repeatable and precise removal of complex bone volumes of the type that would allow en bloc removal of a bone tumour. These robotically created volumes can be precisely filled with additively manufactured patient-specific implants, with minimal gap between cut surface and implant interface.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10497442
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104974422023-09-14 Robot-assisted implantation of additively manufactured patient-specific orthopaedic implants: evaluation in a sheep model Williamson, Tom Ryan, Stewart Buehner, Ulrich Sweeney, Zac Hill, Dave Lozanovski, Bill Kastrati, Endri Namvar, Arman Beths, Thierry Shidid, Darpan Blanchard, Romane Fox, Kate Leary, Martin Choong, Peter Brandt, Milan Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Original Article PURPOSE: Bone tumours must be surgically excised in one piece with a margin of healthy tissue. The unique nature of each bone tumour case is well suited to the use of patient-specific implants, with additive manufacturing allowing production of highly complex geometries. This work represents the first assessment of the combination of surgical robotics and patient-specific additively manufactured implants. METHODS: The development and evaluation of a robotic system for bone tumour excision, capable of milling complex osteotomy paths, is described. The developed system was evaluated as part of an animal trial on 24 adult male sheep, in which robotic bone excision of the distal femur was followed by placement of patient-specific implants with operative time evaluated. Assessment of implant placement accuracy was completed based on post-operative CT scans. RESULTS: A mean overall implant position error of 1.05 ± 0.53 mm was achieved, in combination with a mean orientation error of 2.38 ± 0.98°. A mean procedure time (from access to implantation, excluding opening and closing) of 89.3 ± 25.25 min was observed, with recorded surgical time between 58 and 133 min, with this approximately evenly divided between robotic (43.9 ± 15.32) and implant-based (45.4 ± 18.97) tasks. CONCLUSIONS: This work demonstrates the ability for robotics to achieve repeatable and precise removal of complex bone volumes of the type that would allow en bloc removal of a bone tumour. These robotically created volumes can be precisely filled with additively manufactured patient-specific implants, with minimal gap between cut surface and implant interface. Springer International Publishing 2023-03-01 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10497442/ /pubmed/36859520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-023-02848-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Williamson, Tom
Ryan, Stewart
Buehner, Ulrich
Sweeney, Zac
Hill, Dave
Lozanovski, Bill
Kastrati, Endri
Namvar, Arman
Beths, Thierry
Shidid, Darpan
Blanchard, Romane
Fox, Kate
Leary, Martin
Choong, Peter
Brandt, Milan
Robot-assisted implantation of additively manufactured patient-specific orthopaedic implants: evaluation in a sheep model
title Robot-assisted implantation of additively manufactured patient-specific orthopaedic implants: evaluation in a sheep model
title_full Robot-assisted implantation of additively manufactured patient-specific orthopaedic implants: evaluation in a sheep model
title_fullStr Robot-assisted implantation of additively manufactured patient-specific orthopaedic implants: evaluation in a sheep model
title_full_unstemmed Robot-assisted implantation of additively manufactured patient-specific orthopaedic implants: evaluation in a sheep model
title_short Robot-assisted implantation of additively manufactured patient-specific orthopaedic implants: evaluation in a sheep model
title_sort robot-assisted implantation of additively manufactured patient-specific orthopaedic implants: evaluation in a sheep model
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10497442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36859520
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-023-02848-8
work_keys_str_mv AT williamsontom robotassistedimplantationofadditivelymanufacturedpatientspecificorthopaedicimplantsevaluationinasheepmodel
AT ryanstewart robotassistedimplantationofadditivelymanufacturedpatientspecificorthopaedicimplantsevaluationinasheepmodel
AT buehnerulrich robotassistedimplantationofadditivelymanufacturedpatientspecificorthopaedicimplantsevaluationinasheepmodel
AT sweeneyzac robotassistedimplantationofadditivelymanufacturedpatientspecificorthopaedicimplantsevaluationinasheepmodel
AT hilldave robotassistedimplantationofadditivelymanufacturedpatientspecificorthopaedicimplantsevaluationinasheepmodel
AT lozanovskibill robotassistedimplantationofadditivelymanufacturedpatientspecificorthopaedicimplantsevaluationinasheepmodel
AT kastratiendri robotassistedimplantationofadditivelymanufacturedpatientspecificorthopaedicimplantsevaluationinasheepmodel
AT namvararman robotassistedimplantationofadditivelymanufacturedpatientspecificorthopaedicimplantsevaluationinasheepmodel
AT bethsthierry robotassistedimplantationofadditivelymanufacturedpatientspecificorthopaedicimplantsevaluationinasheepmodel
AT shididdarpan robotassistedimplantationofadditivelymanufacturedpatientspecificorthopaedicimplantsevaluationinasheepmodel
AT blanchardromane robotassistedimplantationofadditivelymanufacturedpatientspecificorthopaedicimplantsevaluationinasheepmodel
AT foxkate robotassistedimplantationofadditivelymanufacturedpatientspecificorthopaedicimplantsevaluationinasheepmodel
AT learymartin robotassistedimplantationofadditivelymanufacturedpatientspecificorthopaedicimplantsevaluationinasheepmodel
AT choongpeter robotassistedimplantationofadditivelymanufacturedpatientspecificorthopaedicimplantsevaluationinasheepmodel
AT brandtmilan robotassistedimplantationofadditivelymanufacturedpatientspecificorthopaedicimplantsevaluationinasheepmodel