Cargando…
Robot-assisted implantation of additively manufactured patient-specific orthopaedic implants: evaluation in a sheep model
PURPOSE: Bone tumours must be surgically excised in one piece with a margin of healthy tissue. The unique nature of each bone tumour case is well suited to the use of patient-specific implants, with additive manufacturing allowing production of highly complex geometries. This work represents the fir...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10497442/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36859520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-023-02848-8 |
_version_ | 1785105305219104768 |
---|---|
author | Williamson, Tom Ryan, Stewart Buehner, Ulrich Sweeney, Zac Hill, Dave Lozanovski, Bill Kastrati, Endri Namvar, Arman Beths, Thierry Shidid, Darpan Blanchard, Romane Fox, Kate Leary, Martin Choong, Peter Brandt, Milan |
author_facet | Williamson, Tom Ryan, Stewart Buehner, Ulrich Sweeney, Zac Hill, Dave Lozanovski, Bill Kastrati, Endri Namvar, Arman Beths, Thierry Shidid, Darpan Blanchard, Romane Fox, Kate Leary, Martin Choong, Peter Brandt, Milan |
author_sort | Williamson, Tom |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Bone tumours must be surgically excised in one piece with a margin of healthy tissue. The unique nature of each bone tumour case is well suited to the use of patient-specific implants, with additive manufacturing allowing production of highly complex geometries. This work represents the first assessment of the combination of surgical robotics and patient-specific additively manufactured implants. METHODS: The development and evaluation of a robotic system for bone tumour excision, capable of milling complex osteotomy paths, is described. The developed system was evaluated as part of an animal trial on 24 adult male sheep, in which robotic bone excision of the distal femur was followed by placement of patient-specific implants with operative time evaluated. Assessment of implant placement accuracy was completed based on post-operative CT scans. RESULTS: A mean overall implant position error of 1.05 ± 0.53 mm was achieved, in combination with a mean orientation error of 2.38 ± 0.98°. A mean procedure time (from access to implantation, excluding opening and closing) of 89.3 ± 25.25 min was observed, with recorded surgical time between 58 and 133 min, with this approximately evenly divided between robotic (43.9 ± 15.32) and implant-based (45.4 ± 18.97) tasks. CONCLUSIONS: This work demonstrates the ability for robotics to achieve repeatable and precise removal of complex bone volumes of the type that would allow en bloc removal of a bone tumour. These robotically created volumes can be precisely filled with additively manufactured patient-specific implants, with minimal gap between cut surface and implant interface. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10497442 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104974422023-09-14 Robot-assisted implantation of additively manufactured patient-specific orthopaedic implants: evaluation in a sheep model Williamson, Tom Ryan, Stewart Buehner, Ulrich Sweeney, Zac Hill, Dave Lozanovski, Bill Kastrati, Endri Namvar, Arman Beths, Thierry Shidid, Darpan Blanchard, Romane Fox, Kate Leary, Martin Choong, Peter Brandt, Milan Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Original Article PURPOSE: Bone tumours must be surgically excised in one piece with a margin of healthy tissue. The unique nature of each bone tumour case is well suited to the use of patient-specific implants, with additive manufacturing allowing production of highly complex geometries. This work represents the first assessment of the combination of surgical robotics and patient-specific additively manufactured implants. METHODS: The development and evaluation of a robotic system for bone tumour excision, capable of milling complex osteotomy paths, is described. The developed system was evaluated as part of an animal trial on 24 adult male sheep, in which robotic bone excision of the distal femur was followed by placement of patient-specific implants with operative time evaluated. Assessment of implant placement accuracy was completed based on post-operative CT scans. RESULTS: A mean overall implant position error of 1.05 ± 0.53 mm was achieved, in combination with a mean orientation error of 2.38 ± 0.98°. A mean procedure time (from access to implantation, excluding opening and closing) of 89.3 ± 25.25 min was observed, with recorded surgical time between 58 and 133 min, with this approximately evenly divided between robotic (43.9 ± 15.32) and implant-based (45.4 ± 18.97) tasks. CONCLUSIONS: This work demonstrates the ability for robotics to achieve repeatable and precise removal of complex bone volumes of the type that would allow en bloc removal of a bone tumour. These robotically created volumes can be precisely filled with additively manufactured patient-specific implants, with minimal gap between cut surface and implant interface. Springer International Publishing 2023-03-01 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10497442/ /pubmed/36859520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-023-02848-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Williamson, Tom Ryan, Stewart Buehner, Ulrich Sweeney, Zac Hill, Dave Lozanovski, Bill Kastrati, Endri Namvar, Arman Beths, Thierry Shidid, Darpan Blanchard, Romane Fox, Kate Leary, Martin Choong, Peter Brandt, Milan Robot-assisted implantation of additively manufactured patient-specific orthopaedic implants: evaluation in a sheep model |
title | Robot-assisted implantation of additively manufactured patient-specific orthopaedic implants: evaluation in a sheep model |
title_full | Robot-assisted implantation of additively manufactured patient-specific orthopaedic implants: evaluation in a sheep model |
title_fullStr | Robot-assisted implantation of additively manufactured patient-specific orthopaedic implants: evaluation in a sheep model |
title_full_unstemmed | Robot-assisted implantation of additively manufactured patient-specific orthopaedic implants: evaluation in a sheep model |
title_short | Robot-assisted implantation of additively manufactured patient-specific orthopaedic implants: evaluation in a sheep model |
title_sort | robot-assisted implantation of additively manufactured patient-specific orthopaedic implants: evaluation in a sheep model |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10497442/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36859520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-023-02848-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT williamsontom robotassistedimplantationofadditivelymanufacturedpatientspecificorthopaedicimplantsevaluationinasheepmodel AT ryanstewart robotassistedimplantationofadditivelymanufacturedpatientspecificorthopaedicimplantsevaluationinasheepmodel AT buehnerulrich robotassistedimplantationofadditivelymanufacturedpatientspecificorthopaedicimplantsevaluationinasheepmodel AT sweeneyzac robotassistedimplantationofadditivelymanufacturedpatientspecificorthopaedicimplantsevaluationinasheepmodel AT hilldave robotassistedimplantationofadditivelymanufacturedpatientspecificorthopaedicimplantsevaluationinasheepmodel AT lozanovskibill robotassistedimplantationofadditivelymanufacturedpatientspecificorthopaedicimplantsevaluationinasheepmodel AT kastratiendri robotassistedimplantationofadditivelymanufacturedpatientspecificorthopaedicimplantsevaluationinasheepmodel AT namvararman robotassistedimplantationofadditivelymanufacturedpatientspecificorthopaedicimplantsevaluationinasheepmodel AT bethsthierry robotassistedimplantationofadditivelymanufacturedpatientspecificorthopaedicimplantsevaluationinasheepmodel AT shididdarpan robotassistedimplantationofadditivelymanufacturedpatientspecificorthopaedicimplantsevaluationinasheepmodel AT blanchardromane robotassistedimplantationofadditivelymanufacturedpatientspecificorthopaedicimplantsevaluationinasheepmodel AT foxkate robotassistedimplantationofadditivelymanufacturedpatientspecificorthopaedicimplantsevaluationinasheepmodel AT learymartin robotassistedimplantationofadditivelymanufacturedpatientspecificorthopaedicimplantsevaluationinasheepmodel AT choongpeter robotassistedimplantationofadditivelymanufacturedpatientspecificorthopaedicimplantsevaluationinasheepmodel AT brandtmilan robotassistedimplantationofadditivelymanufacturedpatientspecificorthopaedicimplantsevaluationinasheepmodel |