Cargando…
Feeding climate and biodiversity goals with novel plant-based meat and milk alternatives
Plant-based animal product alternatives are increasingly promoted to achieve more sustainable diets. Here, we use a global economic land use model to assess the food system-wide impacts of a global dietary shift towards these alternatives. We find a substantial reduction in the global environmental...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10497520/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37699877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-40899-2 |
_version_ | 1785105318573768704 |
---|---|
author | Kozicka, Marta Havlík, Petr Valin, Hugo Wollenberg, Eva Deppermann, Andre Leclère, David Lauri, Pekka Moses, Rebekah Boere, Esther Frank, Stefan Davis, Chris Park, Esther Gurwick, Noel |
author_facet | Kozicka, Marta Havlík, Petr Valin, Hugo Wollenberg, Eva Deppermann, Andre Leclère, David Lauri, Pekka Moses, Rebekah Boere, Esther Frank, Stefan Davis, Chris Park, Esther Gurwick, Noel |
author_sort | Kozicka, Marta |
collection | PubMed |
description | Plant-based animal product alternatives are increasingly promoted to achieve more sustainable diets. Here, we use a global economic land use model to assess the food system-wide impacts of a global dietary shift towards these alternatives. We find a substantial reduction in the global environmental impacts by 2050 if globally 50% of the main animal products (pork, chicken, beef and milk) are substituted—net reduction of forest and natural land is almost fully halted and agriculture and land use GHG emissions decline by 31% in 2050 compared to 2020. If spared agricultural land within forest ecosystems is restored to forest, climate benefits could double, reaching 92% of the previously estimated land sector mitigation potential. Furthermore, the restored area could contribute to 13-25% of the estimated global land restoration needs under target 2 from the Kunming Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework by 2030, and future declines in ecosystem integrity by 2050 would be more than halved. The distribution of these impacts varies across regions—the main impacts on agricultural input use are in China and on environmental outcomes in Sub-Saharan Africa and South America. While beef replacement provides the largest impacts, substituting multiple products is synergistic. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10497520 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104975202023-09-14 Feeding climate and biodiversity goals with novel plant-based meat and milk alternatives Kozicka, Marta Havlík, Petr Valin, Hugo Wollenberg, Eva Deppermann, Andre Leclère, David Lauri, Pekka Moses, Rebekah Boere, Esther Frank, Stefan Davis, Chris Park, Esther Gurwick, Noel Nat Commun Article Plant-based animal product alternatives are increasingly promoted to achieve more sustainable diets. Here, we use a global economic land use model to assess the food system-wide impacts of a global dietary shift towards these alternatives. We find a substantial reduction in the global environmental impacts by 2050 if globally 50% of the main animal products (pork, chicken, beef and milk) are substituted—net reduction of forest and natural land is almost fully halted and agriculture and land use GHG emissions decline by 31% in 2050 compared to 2020. If spared agricultural land within forest ecosystems is restored to forest, climate benefits could double, reaching 92% of the previously estimated land sector mitigation potential. Furthermore, the restored area could contribute to 13-25% of the estimated global land restoration needs under target 2 from the Kunming Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework by 2030, and future declines in ecosystem integrity by 2050 would be more than halved. The distribution of these impacts varies across regions—the main impacts on agricultural input use are in China and on environmental outcomes in Sub-Saharan Africa and South America. While beef replacement provides the largest impacts, substituting multiple products is synergistic. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10497520/ /pubmed/37699877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-40899-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Kozicka, Marta Havlík, Petr Valin, Hugo Wollenberg, Eva Deppermann, Andre Leclère, David Lauri, Pekka Moses, Rebekah Boere, Esther Frank, Stefan Davis, Chris Park, Esther Gurwick, Noel Feeding climate and biodiversity goals with novel plant-based meat and milk alternatives |
title | Feeding climate and biodiversity goals with novel plant-based meat and milk alternatives |
title_full | Feeding climate and biodiversity goals with novel plant-based meat and milk alternatives |
title_fullStr | Feeding climate and biodiversity goals with novel plant-based meat and milk alternatives |
title_full_unstemmed | Feeding climate and biodiversity goals with novel plant-based meat and milk alternatives |
title_short | Feeding climate and biodiversity goals with novel plant-based meat and milk alternatives |
title_sort | feeding climate and biodiversity goals with novel plant-based meat and milk alternatives |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10497520/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37699877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-40899-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kozickamarta feedingclimateandbiodiversitygoalswithnovelplantbasedmeatandmilkalternatives AT havlikpetr feedingclimateandbiodiversitygoalswithnovelplantbasedmeatandmilkalternatives AT valinhugo feedingclimateandbiodiversitygoalswithnovelplantbasedmeatandmilkalternatives AT wollenbergeva feedingclimateandbiodiversitygoalswithnovelplantbasedmeatandmilkalternatives AT deppermannandre feedingclimateandbiodiversitygoalswithnovelplantbasedmeatandmilkalternatives AT lecleredavid feedingclimateandbiodiversitygoalswithnovelplantbasedmeatandmilkalternatives AT lauripekka feedingclimateandbiodiversitygoalswithnovelplantbasedmeatandmilkalternatives AT mosesrebekah feedingclimateandbiodiversitygoalswithnovelplantbasedmeatandmilkalternatives AT boereesther feedingclimateandbiodiversitygoalswithnovelplantbasedmeatandmilkalternatives AT frankstefan feedingclimateandbiodiversitygoalswithnovelplantbasedmeatandmilkalternatives AT davischris feedingclimateandbiodiversitygoalswithnovelplantbasedmeatandmilkalternatives AT parkesther feedingclimateandbiodiversitygoalswithnovelplantbasedmeatandmilkalternatives AT gurwicknoel feedingclimateandbiodiversitygoalswithnovelplantbasedmeatandmilkalternatives |