Cargando…

Nature, Nurture, and the Meaning of Educational Attainment: Differences by Sex and Socioeconomic Status

Estimated heritability of educational attainment (EA) varies widely, from 23% to 80%, with growing evidence suggesting the degree to which genetic variation contributes to individual differences in EA is highly dependent upon situational factors. We aimed to decompose EA into influences attributable...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arpawong, Thalida Em, Gatz, Margaret, Zavala, Catalina, Gruenewald, Tara L., Walters, Ellen E., Prescott, Carol A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10497722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36912114
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/thg.2023.6
_version_ 1785105363994935296
author Arpawong, Thalida Em
Gatz, Margaret
Zavala, Catalina
Gruenewald, Tara L.
Walters, Ellen E.
Prescott, Carol A.
author_facet Arpawong, Thalida Em
Gatz, Margaret
Zavala, Catalina
Gruenewald, Tara L.
Walters, Ellen E.
Prescott, Carol A.
author_sort Arpawong, Thalida Em
collection PubMed
description Estimated heritability of educational attainment (EA) varies widely, from 23% to 80%, with growing evidence suggesting the degree to which genetic variation contributes to individual differences in EA is highly dependent upon situational factors. We aimed to decompose EA into influences attributable to genetic propensity and to environmental context and their interplay, while considering influences of rearing household economic status (HES) and sex. We use the Project Talent Twin and Sibling Study, drawn from the population-representative cohort of high school students assessed in 1960 and followed through 2014, to ages 68–72. Data from 3552 twins and siblings from 1741 families were analyzed using multilevel regression and multiple group structural equation models. Individuals from less-advantaged backgrounds had lower EA and less variation. Genetic variance accounted for 51% of the total variance, but within women and men, 40% and 58% of the total variance respectively. Men had stable genetic variance on EA across all HES strata, whereas high HES women showed the same level of genetic influence as men, and lower HES women had constrained genetic influence on EA. Unexpectedly, middle HES women showed the largest constraints in genetic influence on EA. Shared family environment appears to make an outsized contribution to greater variability for women in this middle stratum and whether they pursue more EA. Implications are that without considering early life opportunity, genetic studies on education may mischaracterize sex differences because education reflects different degrees of genetic and environmental influences for women and men.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10497722
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104977222023-09-28 Nature, Nurture, and the Meaning of Educational Attainment: Differences by Sex and Socioeconomic Status Arpawong, Thalida Em Gatz, Margaret Zavala, Catalina Gruenewald, Tara L. Walters, Ellen E. Prescott, Carol A. Twin Res Hum Genet Article Estimated heritability of educational attainment (EA) varies widely, from 23% to 80%, with growing evidence suggesting the degree to which genetic variation contributes to individual differences in EA is highly dependent upon situational factors. We aimed to decompose EA into influences attributable to genetic propensity and to environmental context and their interplay, while considering influences of rearing household economic status (HES) and sex. We use the Project Talent Twin and Sibling Study, drawn from the population-representative cohort of high school students assessed in 1960 and followed through 2014, to ages 68–72. Data from 3552 twins and siblings from 1741 families were analyzed using multilevel regression and multiple group structural equation models. Individuals from less-advantaged backgrounds had lower EA and less variation. Genetic variance accounted for 51% of the total variance, but within women and men, 40% and 58% of the total variance respectively. Men had stable genetic variance on EA across all HES strata, whereas high HES women showed the same level of genetic influence as men, and lower HES women had constrained genetic influence on EA. Unexpectedly, middle HES women showed the largest constraints in genetic influence on EA. Shared family environment appears to make an outsized contribution to greater variability for women in this middle stratum and whether they pursue more EA. Implications are that without considering early life opportunity, genetic studies on education may mischaracterize sex differences because education reflects different degrees of genetic and environmental influences for women and men. 2023-02 2023-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10497722/ /pubmed/36912114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/thg.2023.6 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Arpawong, Thalida Em
Gatz, Margaret
Zavala, Catalina
Gruenewald, Tara L.
Walters, Ellen E.
Prescott, Carol A.
Nature, Nurture, and the Meaning of Educational Attainment: Differences by Sex and Socioeconomic Status
title Nature, Nurture, and the Meaning of Educational Attainment: Differences by Sex and Socioeconomic Status
title_full Nature, Nurture, and the Meaning of Educational Attainment: Differences by Sex and Socioeconomic Status
title_fullStr Nature, Nurture, and the Meaning of Educational Attainment: Differences by Sex and Socioeconomic Status
title_full_unstemmed Nature, Nurture, and the Meaning of Educational Attainment: Differences by Sex and Socioeconomic Status
title_short Nature, Nurture, and the Meaning of Educational Attainment: Differences by Sex and Socioeconomic Status
title_sort nature, nurture, and the meaning of educational attainment: differences by sex and socioeconomic status
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10497722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36912114
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/thg.2023.6
work_keys_str_mv AT arpawongthalidaem naturenurtureandthemeaningofeducationalattainmentdifferencesbysexandsocioeconomicstatus
AT gatzmargaret naturenurtureandthemeaningofeducationalattainmentdifferencesbysexandsocioeconomicstatus
AT zavalacatalina naturenurtureandthemeaningofeducationalattainmentdifferencesbysexandsocioeconomicstatus
AT gruenewaldtaral naturenurtureandthemeaningofeducationalattainmentdifferencesbysexandsocioeconomicstatus
AT waltersellene naturenurtureandthemeaningofeducationalattainmentdifferencesbysexandsocioeconomicstatus
AT prescottcarola naturenurtureandthemeaningofeducationalattainmentdifferencesbysexandsocioeconomicstatus