Cargando…
Comparison between regular additional endobiliary radiofrequency ablation and photodynamic therapy in patients with advanced extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma under systemic chemotherapy
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (eCCA) remains a malignancy with a dismal prognosis. The first-line standard of care includes systemic chemotherapy (SC) and biliary drainage through stenting. Endobiliary ablative techniques, such as photodynamic therapy (ePDT) and radio-frequenc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10497756/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37711210 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1227036 |
_version_ | 1785105370165805056 |
---|---|
author | Möhring, Christian Khan, Oliver Zhou, Taotao Sadeghlar, Farsaneh Mahn, Robert Kaczmarek, Dominik J. Dold, Leona Toma, Marieta Marinova, Milka Glowka, Tim R. Matthaei, Hanno Manekeller, Steffen Kalff, Jörg C. Strassburg, Christian P. Weismüller, Tobias J. Gonzalez-Carmona, Maria A. |
author_facet | Möhring, Christian Khan, Oliver Zhou, Taotao Sadeghlar, Farsaneh Mahn, Robert Kaczmarek, Dominik J. Dold, Leona Toma, Marieta Marinova, Milka Glowka, Tim R. Matthaei, Hanno Manekeller, Steffen Kalff, Jörg C. Strassburg, Christian P. Weismüller, Tobias J. Gonzalez-Carmona, Maria A. |
author_sort | Möhring, Christian |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (eCCA) remains a malignancy with a dismal prognosis. The first-line standard of care includes systemic chemotherapy (SC) and biliary drainage through stenting. Endobiliary ablative techniques, such as photodynamic therapy (ePDT) and radio-frequency ablation (eRFA), have demonstrated feasibility and favorable survival data. This study aimed to compare the oncologic outcome in patients treated with SC and concomitant eRFA or ePDT. METHOD: All patients with eCCA were evaluated for study inclusion. Sixty-three patients receiving a combination of SC and at least one endobiliary treatment were retrospectively compared. RESULTS: Patients were stratified into three groups: SC + ePDT (n = 22), SC + eRFA (n = 28), and SC + ePDT + eRFA (n = 13). The median overall survival (OS) of the whole cohort was 14.2 months with no statistically significant difference between the three therapy groups but a trend to better survival for the group receiving ePDT as well as eRFA, during SC (ePDT + SC, 12.7 months; eRFA + SC, 13.8 months; ePDT + eRFA + SC, 20.2 months; p = 0.112). The multivariate Cox regression and subgroup analysis highlighted the beneficial effect of eRFA on OS. Overall, combined therapy was well tolerated. Only cholangitis occurred more often in the SC + eRFA group. CONCLUSION: Additional endobiliary ablative therapies in combination with SC were feasible. Both modalities, eRFA and ePDT, showed a similar benefit in terms of survival. Interestingly, patients receiving both regimes showed the best OS indicating a possible synergism between both ablative therapeutic techniques. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10497756 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104977562023-09-14 Comparison between regular additional endobiliary radiofrequency ablation and photodynamic therapy in patients with advanced extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma under systemic chemotherapy Möhring, Christian Khan, Oliver Zhou, Taotao Sadeghlar, Farsaneh Mahn, Robert Kaczmarek, Dominik J. Dold, Leona Toma, Marieta Marinova, Milka Glowka, Tim R. Matthaei, Hanno Manekeller, Steffen Kalff, Jörg C. Strassburg, Christian P. Weismüller, Tobias J. Gonzalez-Carmona, Maria A. Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (eCCA) remains a malignancy with a dismal prognosis. The first-line standard of care includes systemic chemotherapy (SC) and biliary drainage through stenting. Endobiliary ablative techniques, such as photodynamic therapy (ePDT) and radio-frequency ablation (eRFA), have demonstrated feasibility and favorable survival data. This study aimed to compare the oncologic outcome in patients treated with SC and concomitant eRFA or ePDT. METHOD: All patients with eCCA were evaluated for study inclusion. Sixty-three patients receiving a combination of SC and at least one endobiliary treatment were retrospectively compared. RESULTS: Patients were stratified into three groups: SC + ePDT (n = 22), SC + eRFA (n = 28), and SC + ePDT + eRFA (n = 13). The median overall survival (OS) of the whole cohort was 14.2 months with no statistically significant difference between the three therapy groups but a trend to better survival for the group receiving ePDT as well as eRFA, during SC (ePDT + SC, 12.7 months; eRFA + SC, 13.8 months; ePDT + eRFA + SC, 20.2 months; p = 0.112). The multivariate Cox regression and subgroup analysis highlighted the beneficial effect of eRFA on OS. Overall, combined therapy was well tolerated. Only cholangitis occurred more often in the SC + eRFA group. CONCLUSION: Additional endobiliary ablative therapies in combination with SC were feasible. Both modalities, eRFA and ePDT, showed a similar benefit in terms of survival. Interestingly, patients receiving both regimes showed the best OS indicating a possible synergism between both ablative therapeutic techniques. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10497756/ /pubmed/37711210 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1227036 Text en Copyright © 2023 Möhring, Khan, Zhou, Sadeghlar, Mahn, Kaczmarek, Dold, Toma, Marinova, Glowka, Matthaei, Manekeller, Kalff, Strassburg, Weismüller and Gonzalez-Carmona https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Möhring, Christian Khan, Oliver Zhou, Taotao Sadeghlar, Farsaneh Mahn, Robert Kaczmarek, Dominik J. Dold, Leona Toma, Marieta Marinova, Milka Glowka, Tim R. Matthaei, Hanno Manekeller, Steffen Kalff, Jörg C. Strassburg, Christian P. Weismüller, Tobias J. Gonzalez-Carmona, Maria A. Comparison between regular additional endobiliary radiofrequency ablation and photodynamic therapy in patients with advanced extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma under systemic chemotherapy |
title | Comparison between regular additional endobiliary radiofrequency ablation and photodynamic therapy in patients with advanced extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma under systemic chemotherapy |
title_full | Comparison between regular additional endobiliary radiofrequency ablation and photodynamic therapy in patients with advanced extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma under systemic chemotherapy |
title_fullStr | Comparison between regular additional endobiliary radiofrequency ablation and photodynamic therapy in patients with advanced extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma under systemic chemotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison between regular additional endobiliary radiofrequency ablation and photodynamic therapy in patients with advanced extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma under systemic chemotherapy |
title_short | Comparison between regular additional endobiliary radiofrequency ablation and photodynamic therapy in patients with advanced extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma under systemic chemotherapy |
title_sort | comparison between regular additional endobiliary radiofrequency ablation and photodynamic therapy in patients with advanced extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma under systemic chemotherapy |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10497756/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37711210 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1227036 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mohringchristian comparisonbetweenregularadditionalendobiliaryradiofrequencyablationandphotodynamictherapyinpatientswithadvancedextrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaundersystemicchemotherapy AT khanoliver comparisonbetweenregularadditionalendobiliaryradiofrequencyablationandphotodynamictherapyinpatientswithadvancedextrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaundersystemicchemotherapy AT zhoutaotao comparisonbetweenregularadditionalendobiliaryradiofrequencyablationandphotodynamictherapyinpatientswithadvancedextrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaundersystemicchemotherapy AT sadeghlarfarsaneh comparisonbetweenregularadditionalendobiliaryradiofrequencyablationandphotodynamictherapyinpatientswithadvancedextrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaundersystemicchemotherapy AT mahnrobert comparisonbetweenregularadditionalendobiliaryradiofrequencyablationandphotodynamictherapyinpatientswithadvancedextrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaundersystemicchemotherapy AT kaczmarekdominikj comparisonbetweenregularadditionalendobiliaryradiofrequencyablationandphotodynamictherapyinpatientswithadvancedextrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaundersystemicchemotherapy AT doldleona comparisonbetweenregularadditionalendobiliaryradiofrequencyablationandphotodynamictherapyinpatientswithadvancedextrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaundersystemicchemotherapy AT tomamarieta comparisonbetweenregularadditionalendobiliaryradiofrequencyablationandphotodynamictherapyinpatientswithadvancedextrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaundersystemicchemotherapy AT marinovamilka comparisonbetweenregularadditionalendobiliaryradiofrequencyablationandphotodynamictherapyinpatientswithadvancedextrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaundersystemicchemotherapy AT glowkatimr comparisonbetweenregularadditionalendobiliaryradiofrequencyablationandphotodynamictherapyinpatientswithadvancedextrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaundersystemicchemotherapy AT matthaeihanno comparisonbetweenregularadditionalendobiliaryradiofrequencyablationandphotodynamictherapyinpatientswithadvancedextrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaundersystemicchemotherapy AT manekellersteffen comparisonbetweenregularadditionalendobiliaryradiofrequencyablationandphotodynamictherapyinpatientswithadvancedextrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaundersystemicchemotherapy AT kalffjorgc comparisonbetweenregularadditionalendobiliaryradiofrequencyablationandphotodynamictherapyinpatientswithadvancedextrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaundersystemicchemotherapy AT strassburgchristianp comparisonbetweenregularadditionalendobiliaryradiofrequencyablationandphotodynamictherapyinpatientswithadvancedextrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaundersystemicchemotherapy AT weismullertobiasj comparisonbetweenregularadditionalendobiliaryradiofrequencyablationandphotodynamictherapyinpatientswithadvancedextrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaundersystemicchemotherapy AT gonzalezcarmonamariaa comparisonbetweenregularadditionalendobiliaryradiofrequencyablationandphotodynamictherapyinpatientswithadvancedextrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaundersystemicchemotherapy |