Cargando…

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Assistive Technology for Executive Function Support for People With Acquired Brain Injury: Protocol for Single-Case Experimental Designs

BACKGROUND: Executive function, including prospective memory, initiating, planning, and sequencing everyday activities, is frequently affected by acquired brain injury (ABI). Executive dysfunction necessitates the use of compensatory cognitive strategies and, in more severe cases, human support over...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bould, Em, Tate, Robyn, Simpson, Grahame, Brusco, Natasha, Licciardi, Lisa, Callaway, Libby
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10498320/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37642985
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/48503
_version_ 1785105496641896448
author Bould, Em
Tate, Robyn
Simpson, Grahame
Brusco, Natasha
Licciardi, Lisa
Callaway, Libby
author_facet Bould, Em
Tate, Robyn
Simpson, Grahame
Brusco, Natasha
Licciardi, Lisa
Callaway, Libby
author_sort Bould, Em
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Executive function, including prospective memory, initiating, planning, and sequencing everyday activities, is frequently affected by acquired brain injury (ABI). Executive dysfunction necessitates the use of compensatory cognitive strategies and, in more severe cases, human support over time. To compensate for the executive dysfunction experienced, growing options for electronic mainstream and assistive technologies may be used by people with ABI and their supporters. OBJECTIVE: We outline the study protocol for a series of single-case experimental designs (SCEDs) to evaluate the effectiveness of smart home, mobile, and/or wearable technologies in reducing executive function difficulties following ABI. METHODS: Up to 10 adults with ABI who experience executive dysfunction and have sufficient cognitive capacity to provide informed consent will be recruited across Victoria and New South Wales, Australia. Other key inclusion criteria are that they have substantial support needs for everyday living and reside in community dwellings. On the basis of the participant’s identified goal(s) and target behavior(s), a specific electronic assistive technology will be selected for application. Both identification of the target behavior(s) and selection of the assistive technology will be determined via consultation with each participant (and their key support person, if applicable). The choice of SCED will be individualized for each participant based on the type of technology used in the intervention, the difficulty level of the behavior targeted for change, and the anticipated rate of change. For each SCED, repeated measurements of the target behavior(s) during the baseline condition will provide performance data for comparison with the performance data collected during the intervention condition (with technology introduced). Secondary outcome measures will evaluate the impact of the intervention. The protocol includes 2 customizable Microsoft Excel spreadsheets for electronic record keeping. RESULTS: Recruitment period is June 2022 through March 2024. Trial results for the individual participants will be graphed and analyzed separately using structured visual analysis supplemented with statistical analysis. Analysis will focus on important features of the data, including both within- and between-phase comparisons for response level, trend, variability, immediacy, consistency, and overlap. An exploratory economic evaluation will determine the impact on formal and informal support usage, together with quality of life, following the implementation of the new technological intervention. CONCLUSIONS: The study has been designed to test the cause-effect functional relationships between the intervention—in this case, electronic assistive technology—and its effect in changing the target behavior(s). The evaluation evidence gained will offer new insights into the application of various electronic assistive technologies for people who experience executive dysfunction following ABI. Furthermore, the results will help increase the capacity of key stakeholders to harness the potential of technology to build independence and reduce the cost of care for this population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) ACTRN12622000835741, https://www.anzctr.org.au/ACTRN12622000835741.aspx INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/48503
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10498320
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104983202023-09-14 Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Assistive Technology for Executive Function Support for People With Acquired Brain Injury: Protocol for Single-Case Experimental Designs Bould, Em Tate, Robyn Simpson, Grahame Brusco, Natasha Licciardi, Lisa Callaway, Libby JMIR Res Protoc Protocol BACKGROUND: Executive function, including prospective memory, initiating, planning, and sequencing everyday activities, is frequently affected by acquired brain injury (ABI). Executive dysfunction necessitates the use of compensatory cognitive strategies and, in more severe cases, human support over time. To compensate for the executive dysfunction experienced, growing options for electronic mainstream and assistive technologies may be used by people with ABI and their supporters. OBJECTIVE: We outline the study protocol for a series of single-case experimental designs (SCEDs) to evaluate the effectiveness of smart home, mobile, and/or wearable technologies in reducing executive function difficulties following ABI. METHODS: Up to 10 adults with ABI who experience executive dysfunction and have sufficient cognitive capacity to provide informed consent will be recruited across Victoria and New South Wales, Australia. Other key inclusion criteria are that they have substantial support needs for everyday living and reside in community dwellings. On the basis of the participant’s identified goal(s) and target behavior(s), a specific electronic assistive technology will be selected for application. Both identification of the target behavior(s) and selection of the assistive technology will be determined via consultation with each participant (and their key support person, if applicable). The choice of SCED will be individualized for each participant based on the type of technology used in the intervention, the difficulty level of the behavior targeted for change, and the anticipated rate of change. For each SCED, repeated measurements of the target behavior(s) during the baseline condition will provide performance data for comparison with the performance data collected during the intervention condition (with technology introduced). Secondary outcome measures will evaluate the impact of the intervention. The protocol includes 2 customizable Microsoft Excel spreadsheets for electronic record keeping. RESULTS: Recruitment period is June 2022 through March 2024. Trial results for the individual participants will be graphed and analyzed separately using structured visual analysis supplemented with statistical analysis. Analysis will focus on important features of the data, including both within- and between-phase comparisons for response level, trend, variability, immediacy, consistency, and overlap. An exploratory economic evaluation will determine the impact on formal and informal support usage, together with quality of life, following the implementation of the new technological intervention. CONCLUSIONS: The study has been designed to test the cause-effect functional relationships between the intervention—in this case, electronic assistive technology—and its effect in changing the target behavior(s). The evaluation evidence gained will offer new insights into the application of various electronic assistive technologies for people who experience executive dysfunction following ABI. Furthermore, the results will help increase the capacity of key stakeholders to harness the potential of technology to build independence and reduce the cost of care for this population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) ACTRN12622000835741, https://www.anzctr.org.au/ACTRN12622000835741.aspx INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/48503 JMIR Publications 2023-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10498320/ /pubmed/37642985 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/48503 Text en ©Em Bould, Robyn Tate, Grahame Simpson, Natasha Brusco, Lisa Licciardi, Libby Callaway. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 29.08.2023. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Protocol
Bould, Em
Tate, Robyn
Simpson, Grahame
Brusco, Natasha
Licciardi, Lisa
Callaway, Libby
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Assistive Technology for Executive Function Support for People With Acquired Brain Injury: Protocol for Single-Case Experimental Designs
title Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Assistive Technology for Executive Function Support for People With Acquired Brain Injury: Protocol for Single-Case Experimental Designs
title_full Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Assistive Technology for Executive Function Support for People With Acquired Brain Injury: Protocol for Single-Case Experimental Designs
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Assistive Technology for Executive Function Support for People With Acquired Brain Injury: Protocol for Single-Case Experimental Designs
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Assistive Technology for Executive Function Support for People With Acquired Brain Injury: Protocol for Single-Case Experimental Designs
title_short Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Assistive Technology for Executive Function Support for People With Acquired Brain Injury: Protocol for Single-Case Experimental Designs
title_sort evaluation of the effectiveness of assistive technology for executive function support for people with acquired brain injury: protocol for single-case experimental designs
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10498320/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37642985
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/48503
work_keys_str_mv AT bouldem evaluationoftheeffectivenessofassistivetechnologyforexecutivefunctionsupportforpeoplewithacquiredbraininjuryprotocolforsinglecaseexperimentaldesigns
AT taterobyn evaluationoftheeffectivenessofassistivetechnologyforexecutivefunctionsupportforpeoplewithacquiredbraininjuryprotocolforsinglecaseexperimentaldesigns
AT simpsongrahame evaluationoftheeffectivenessofassistivetechnologyforexecutivefunctionsupportforpeoplewithacquiredbraininjuryprotocolforsinglecaseexperimentaldesigns
AT brusconatasha evaluationoftheeffectivenessofassistivetechnologyforexecutivefunctionsupportforpeoplewithacquiredbraininjuryprotocolforsinglecaseexperimentaldesigns
AT licciardilisa evaluationoftheeffectivenessofassistivetechnologyforexecutivefunctionsupportforpeoplewithacquiredbraininjuryprotocolforsinglecaseexperimentaldesigns
AT callawaylibby evaluationoftheeffectivenessofassistivetechnologyforexecutivefunctionsupportforpeoplewithacquiredbraininjuryprotocolforsinglecaseexperimentaldesigns