Cargando…

A new scale assessing the stressors and rewards of children’s hospice work

BACKGROUND: There is a workforce shortage in the children’s hospice sector, but there has been little research on the specific challenges of working in this setting and on how these challenges might be alleviated. To identify appropriate interventions to improve staff wellbeing, the drivers of wellb...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Papworth, Andrew, Bedendo, Andre, Taylor, Jo, Beresford, Bryony, Mukherjee, Suzanne, Fraser, Lorna K, Ziegler, Lucy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10498554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37705048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-023-01246-w
_version_ 1785105545432137728
author Papworth, Andrew
Bedendo, Andre
Taylor, Jo
Beresford, Bryony
Mukherjee, Suzanne
Fraser, Lorna K
Ziegler, Lucy
author_facet Papworth, Andrew
Bedendo, Andre
Taylor, Jo
Beresford, Bryony
Mukherjee, Suzanne
Fraser, Lorna K
Ziegler, Lucy
author_sort Papworth, Andrew
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is a workforce shortage in the children’s hospice sector, but there has been little research on the specific challenges of working in this setting and on how these challenges might be alleviated. To identify appropriate interventions to improve staff wellbeing, the drivers of wellbeing in children’s hospices need to be known and measured. This paper reports on the development of two measures, one for work-related rewards and one for work-related stressors, for use in children’s hospice care teams. METHODS: A mixed-methods, four-stage study; the first three phases focused on the development of the scales, and the last stage focused on the validation of the scales. Participants of all stages were children’s hospice care team staff members in the UK. Stage 1: survey assessing the relevance and comprehensiveness of the original scale items (N = 60); Stages 2 (focus groups; N = 16) and 3 (cognitive interviews; N = 14) to assess content validity; Stage 4: UK-wide survey (N = 414) to validate the final version of the new, children’s hospice-specific scales using Rasch Analysis (RA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). RESULTS: Due to poor fitting indices shown in the results from the RA, five items (out of 36) were removed from the new rewards scale used in the UK-wide survey and 20 (out of 62) were removed from the new stressors scale. CFA also supported the removal of the items and showed a one-factor structure for the rewards scale and a three-factor structure for the stressors scale were adequate—the sub-scales for the stressors scale related to caring for an ill or dying child (“Child” sub-scale), working with parents and families (“Parent” sub-scale), and stressors related to organisational factors, such as team conflict and workload (“Organisation” sub-scale). CONCLUSIONS: Both of the new scales showed good psychometric properties and can be useful in clinical settings and research to assess the perceived intensity of the work-related rewards and stressors for children’s hospice staff. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12904-023-01246-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10498554
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104985542023-09-14 A new scale assessing the stressors and rewards of children’s hospice work Papworth, Andrew Bedendo, Andre Taylor, Jo Beresford, Bryony Mukherjee, Suzanne Fraser, Lorna K Ziegler, Lucy BMC Palliat Care Research BACKGROUND: There is a workforce shortage in the children’s hospice sector, but there has been little research on the specific challenges of working in this setting and on how these challenges might be alleviated. To identify appropriate interventions to improve staff wellbeing, the drivers of wellbeing in children’s hospices need to be known and measured. This paper reports on the development of two measures, one for work-related rewards and one for work-related stressors, for use in children’s hospice care teams. METHODS: A mixed-methods, four-stage study; the first three phases focused on the development of the scales, and the last stage focused on the validation of the scales. Participants of all stages were children’s hospice care team staff members in the UK. Stage 1: survey assessing the relevance and comprehensiveness of the original scale items (N = 60); Stages 2 (focus groups; N = 16) and 3 (cognitive interviews; N = 14) to assess content validity; Stage 4: UK-wide survey (N = 414) to validate the final version of the new, children’s hospice-specific scales using Rasch Analysis (RA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). RESULTS: Due to poor fitting indices shown in the results from the RA, five items (out of 36) were removed from the new rewards scale used in the UK-wide survey and 20 (out of 62) were removed from the new stressors scale. CFA also supported the removal of the items and showed a one-factor structure for the rewards scale and a three-factor structure for the stressors scale were adequate—the sub-scales for the stressors scale related to caring for an ill or dying child (“Child” sub-scale), working with parents and families (“Parent” sub-scale), and stressors related to organisational factors, such as team conflict and workload (“Organisation” sub-scale). CONCLUSIONS: Both of the new scales showed good psychometric properties and can be useful in clinical settings and research to assess the perceived intensity of the work-related rewards and stressors for children’s hospice staff. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12904-023-01246-w. BioMed Central 2023-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10498554/ /pubmed/37705048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-023-01246-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Papworth, Andrew
Bedendo, Andre
Taylor, Jo
Beresford, Bryony
Mukherjee, Suzanne
Fraser, Lorna K
Ziegler, Lucy
A new scale assessing the stressors and rewards of children’s hospice work
title A new scale assessing the stressors and rewards of children’s hospice work
title_full A new scale assessing the stressors and rewards of children’s hospice work
title_fullStr A new scale assessing the stressors and rewards of children’s hospice work
title_full_unstemmed A new scale assessing the stressors and rewards of children’s hospice work
title_short A new scale assessing the stressors and rewards of children’s hospice work
title_sort new scale assessing the stressors and rewards of children’s hospice work
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10498554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37705048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-023-01246-w
work_keys_str_mv AT papworthandrew anewscaleassessingthestressorsandrewardsofchildrenshospicework
AT bedendoandre anewscaleassessingthestressorsandrewardsofchildrenshospicework
AT taylorjo anewscaleassessingthestressorsandrewardsofchildrenshospicework
AT beresfordbryony anewscaleassessingthestressorsandrewardsofchildrenshospicework
AT mukherjeesuzanne anewscaleassessingthestressorsandrewardsofchildrenshospicework
AT fraserlornak anewscaleassessingthestressorsandrewardsofchildrenshospicework
AT zieglerlucy anewscaleassessingthestressorsandrewardsofchildrenshospicework
AT papworthandrew newscaleassessingthestressorsandrewardsofchildrenshospicework
AT bedendoandre newscaleassessingthestressorsandrewardsofchildrenshospicework
AT taylorjo newscaleassessingthestressorsandrewardsofchildrenshospicework
AT beresfordbryony newscaleassessingthestressorsandrewardsofchildrenshospicework
AT mukherjeesuzanne newscaleassessingthestressorsandrewardsofchildrenshospicework
AT fraserlornak newscaleassessingthestressorsandrewardsofchildrenshospicework
AT zieglerlucy newscaleassessingthestressorsandrewardsofchildrenshospicework