Cargando…

Working in fours: generational communication in the emergency department

BACKGROUND: This study examined the conflicts between different generations working in US emergency departments (ED). We sought to record generational differences involving communication preferences, perceived areas of conflict, work motivations, and attitudes regarding work-life balance. METHODS: W...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guptill, Mindi, Reibling, Ellen, Phan, Tammy, Khoo, Bryant, Lin, Stephen, Donham, Corbin, Wang, Cheryl, Walters, E. Lea
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10498580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37704957
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12245-023-00536-7
_version_ 1785105551719399424
author Guptill, Mindi
Reibling, Ellen
Phan, Tammy
Khoo, Bryant
Lin, Stephen
Donham, Corbin
Wang, Cheryl
Walters, E. Lea
author_facet Guptill, Mindi
Reibling, Ellen
Phan, Tammy
Khoo, Bryant
Lin, Stephen
Donham, Corbin
Wang, Cheryl
Walters, E. Lea
author_sort Guptill, Mindi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study examined the conflicts between different generations working in US emergency departments (ED). We sought to record generational differences involving communication preferences, perceived areas of conflict, work motivations, and attitudes regarding work-life balance. METHODS: We developed a survey to assess the physician perspective on generational conflict in the ED. The survey was distributed to members of the American College of Emergency Physicians, a professional organization comprising emergency medicine physicians in the USA. RESULTS: We received 696 completed responses. Men represented 60% of respondents and the largest proportion of respondents were emergency physicians working in community settings (53%); 11% were residents. Generation representation was smallest for Traditionalist (2%) and largest for Gen X (43%). Seventy percent reported observing conflict due to generational communication with the largest frequency being once a week (26%). In the associated open-ended questions, 247 (33%) provided 316 anecdotal descriptions of observed conflict. Responses clustered into seven themes (ordered by frequency): Work Ethic, Treatment Approach, Technology Application, Entitlement, Professionalism, Work Life/Balance, and Communication Style. Comparing Work Ethic responses, 52–70-year-olds reported that younger providers are less interested in “accomplishing anything” while 26–34-year-olds resented that attitude. Respondents completing the open-ended questions regarding preventing and responding to conflict provided some insight into helpful strategies including actions supportive of clear communication and standardized policies and expectations. Only 5% of respondents reported that they had discussed generational communication in department meetings with the odds of a woman reporting conflict being less than males (p = .01). CONCLUSION: Conflicts in the ED in the USA can be attributed to how an individual views the values of someone from another generation. Understanding the frequency and areas of generational conflict in the ED can help medical leaders find strategies to mitigate negative workplace interactions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12245-023-00536-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10498580
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104985802023-09-14 Working in fours: generational communication in the emergency department Guptill, Mindi Reibling, Ellen Phan, Tammy Khoo, Bryant Lin, Stephen Donham, Corbin Wang, Cheryl Walters, E. Lea Int J Emerg Med Research BACKGROUND: This study examined the conflicts between different generations working in US emergency departments (ED). We sought to record generational differences involving communication preferences, perceived areas of conflict, work motivations, and attitudes regarding work-life balance. METHODS: We developed a survey to assess the physician perspective on generational conflict in the ED. The survey was distributed to members of the American College of Emergency Physicians, a professional organization comprising emergency medicine physicians in the USA. RESULTS: We received 696 completed responses. Men represented 60% of respondents and the largest proportion of respondents were emergency physicians working in community settings (53%); 11% were residents. Generation representation was smallest for Traditionalist (2%) and largest for Gen X (43%). Seventy percent reported observing conflict due to generational communication with the largest frequency being once a week (26%). In the associated open-ended questions, 247 (33%) provided 316 anecdotal descriptions of observed conflict. Responses clustered into seven themes (ordered by frequency): Work Ethic, Treatment Approach, Technology Application, Entitlement, Professionalism, Work Life/Balance, and Communication Style. Comparing Work Ethic responses, 52–70-year-olds reported that younger providers are less interested in “accomplishing anything” while 26–34-year-olds resented that attitude. Respondents completing the open-ended questions regarding preventing and responding to conflict provided some insight into helpful strategies including actions supportive of clear communication and standardized policies and expectations. Only 5% of respondents reported that they had discussed generational communication in department meetings with the odds of a woman reporting conflict being less than males (p = .01). CONCLUSION: Conflicts in the ED in the USA can be attributed to how an individual views the values of someone from another generation. Understanding the frequency and areas of generational conflict in the ED can help medical leaders find strategies to mitigate negative workplace interactions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12245-023-00536-7. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10498580/ /pubmed/37704957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12245-023-00536-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Guptill, Mindi
Reibling, Ellen
Phan, Tammy
Khoo, Bryant
Lin, Stephen
Donham, Corbin
Wang, Cheryl
Walters, E. Lea
Working in fours: generational communication in the emergency department
title Working in fours: generational communication in the emergency department
title_full Working in fours: generational communication in the emergency department
title_fullStr Working in fours: generational communication in the emergency department
title_full_unstemmed Working in fours: generational communication in the emergency department
title_short Working in fours: generational communication in the emergency department
title_sort working in fours: generational communication in the emergency department
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10498580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37704957
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12245-023-00536-7
work_keys_str_mv AT guptillmindi workinginfoursgenerationalcommunicationintheemergencydepartment
AT reiblingellen workinginfoursgenerationalcommunicationintheemergencydepartment
AT phantammy workinginfoursgenerationalcommunicationintheemergencydepartment
AT khoobryant workinginfoursgenerationalcommunicationintheemergencydepartment
AT linstephen workinginfoursgenerationalcommunicationintheemergencydepartment
AT donhamcorbin workinginfoursgenerationalcommunicationintheemergencydepartment
AT wangcheryl workinginfoursgenerationalcommunicationintheemergencydepartment
AT walterselea workinginfoursgenerationalcommunicationintheemergencydepartment