Cargando…

Ultrasound-guided acupotomy for trigger finger: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Trigger finger is a common condition in the hand, and ultrasound-guided acupotomy for trigger finger has been widely used in recent years. PURPOSE: This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided acupotomy for trigger finger. METHODS: We searched for relevant...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liang, Yong-shan, Chen, Ling-yan, Cui, Yao-yun, Du, Chun-xiao, Xu, Yun-xiang, Yin, Lun-hui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10498646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37705066
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04127-3
_version_ 1785105567981764608
author Liang, Yong-shan
Chen, Ling-yan
Cui, Yao-yun
Du, Chun-xiao
Xu, Yun-xiang
Yin, Lun-hui
author_facet Liang, Yong-shan
Chen, Ling-yan
Cui, Yao-yun
Du, Chun-xiao
Xu, Yun-xiang
Yin, Lun-hui
author_sort Liang, Yong-shan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Trigger finger is a common condition in the hand, and ultrasound-guided acupotomy for trigger finger has been widely used in recent years. PURPOSE: This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided acupotomy for trigger finger. METHODS: We searched for relevant studies in the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Embase, PubMed, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), Wanfang Data, and other resources from their inception to January 2023. Randomized controlled trials of ultrasound-guided acupotomy for trigger finger were included. The meta-analysis was carried out using Review Manager 5.4 and Stata 15.1. RESULTS: Overall, 15 studies with 988 patients were included. The experimental group was treated with ultrasound-guided acupotomy, and the Control group received traditional acupotomy, traditional operation or injection of medication. Meta-analysis showed that the overall clinical effectiveness (OR = 4.83; 95% CI 2.49–9.37; I(2) = 73.1%; P < 0.001) in the experimental group was significantly better than that of the control group. And the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score (WMD =  − 1; 95% CI − 1.24, − 0.76; I(2) = 99%; P < 0.001), the QuinneII classification (WMD = − 0.84; 95% CI − 1.28, − 0.39; I(2) = 99.1%, P < 0.001), the incidence of complications (RR = 0.26; 95% CI 0.11, 0.63; I(2) = 0%, P = 0.003), and the recurrence rate (RR = 0.14; 95% CI 0.03, 0.74; I(2) = 0%; P = 0.021) were significantly lower in the experimental group. CONCLUSION: Our systematic review and meta-analysis can prove the effectiveness and safety of ultrasound-guided acupotomy in the treatment of trigger finger, but this still needs to be verified by a clinical standard large sample test.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10498646
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104986462023-09-14 Ultrasound-guided acupotomy for trigger finger: a systematic review and meta-analysis Liang, Yong-shan Chen, Ling-yan Cui, Yao-yun Du, Chun-xiao Xu, Yun-xiang Yin, Lun-hui J Orthop Surg Res Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Trigger finger is a common condition in the hand, and ultrasound-guided acupotomy for trigger finger has been widely used in recent years. PURPOSE: This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided acupotomy for trigger finger. METHODS: We searched for relevant studies in the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Embase, PubMed, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), Wanfang Data, and other resources from their inception to January 2023. Randomized controlled trials of ultrasound-guided acupotomy for trigger finger were included. The meta-analysis was carried out using Review Manager 5.4 and Stata 15.1. RESULTS: Overall, 15 studies with 988 patients were included. The experimental group was treated with ultrasound-guided acupotomy, and the Control group received traditional acupotomy, traditional operation or injection of medication. Meta-analysis showed that the overall clinical effectiveness (OR = 4.83; 95% CI 2.49–9.37; I(2) = 73.1%; P < 0.001) in the experimental group was significantly better than that of the control group. And the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score (WMD =  − 1; 95% CI − 1.24, − 0.76; I(2) = 99%; P < 0.001), the QuinneII classification (WMD = − 0.84; 95% CI − 1.28, − 0.39; I(2) = 99.1%, P < 0.001), the incidence of complications (RR = 0.26; 95% CI 0.11, 0.63; I(2) = 0%, P = 0.003), and the recurrence rate (RR = 0.14; 95% CI 0.03, 0.74; I(2) = 0%; P = 0.021) were significantly lower in the experimental group. CONCLUSION: Our systematic review and meta-analysis can prove the effectiveness and safety of ultrasound-guided acupotomy in the treatment of trigger finger, but this still needs to be verified by a clinical standard large sample test. BioMed Central 2023-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10498646/ /pubmed/37705066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04127-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Liang, Yong-shan
Chen, Ling-yan
Cui, Yao-yun
Du, Chun-xiao
Xu, Yun-xiang
Yin, Lun-hui
Ultrasound-guided acupotomy for trigger finger: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Ultrasound-guided acupotomy for trigger finger: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Ultrasound-guided acupotomy for trigger finger: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Ultrasound-guided acupotomy for trigger finger: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Ultrasound-guided acupotomy for trigger finger: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Ultrasound-guided acupotomy for trigger finger: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort ultrasound-guided acupotomy for trigger finger: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10498646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37705066
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04127-3
work_keys_str_mv AT liangyongshan ultrasoundguidedacupotomyfortriggerfingerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chenlingyan ultrasoundguidedacupotomyfortriggerfingerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT cuiyaoyun ultrasoundguidedacupotomyfortriggerfingerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT duchunxiao ultrasoundguidedacupotomyfortriggerfingerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xuyunxiang ultrasoundguidedacupotomyfortriggerfingerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yinlunhui ultrasoundguidedacupotomyfortriggerfingerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis