Cargando…
Ultrasound-guided acupotomy for trigger finger: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Trigger finger is a common condition in the hand, and ultrasound-guided acupotomy for trigger finger has been widely used in recent years. PURPOSE: This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided acupotomy for trigger finger. METHODS: We searched for relevant...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10498646/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37705066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04127-3 |
_version_ | 1785105567981764608 |
---|---|
author | Liang, Yong-shan Chen, Ling-yan Cui, Yao-yun Du, Chun-xiao Xu, Yun-xiang Yin, Lun-hui |
author_facet | Liang, Yong-shan Chen, Ling-yan Cui, Yao-yun Du, Chun-xiao Xu, Yun-xiang Yin, Lun-hui |
author_sort | Liang, Yong-shan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Trigger finger is a common condition in the hand, and ultrasound-guided acupotomy for trigger finger has been widely used in recent years. PURPOSE: This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided acupotomy for trigger finger. METHODS: We searched for relevant studies in the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Embase, PubMed, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), Wanfang Data, and other resources from their inception to January 2023. Randomized controlled trials of ultrasound-guided acupotomy for trigger finger were included. The meta-analysis was carried out using Review Manager 5.4 and Stata 15.1. RESULTS: Overall, 15 studies with 988 patients were included. The experimental group was treated with ultrasound-guided acupotomy, and the Control group received traditional acupotomy, traditional operation or injection of medication. Meta-analysis showed that the overall clinical effectiveness (OR = 4.83; 95% CI 2.49–9.37; I(2) = 73.1%; P < 0.001) in the experimental group was significantly better than that of the control group. And the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score (WMD = − 1; 95% CI − 1.24, − 0.76; I(2) = 99%; P < 0.001), the QuinneII classification (WMD = − 0.84; 95% CI − 1.28, − 0.39; I(2) = 99.1%, P < 0.001), the incidence of complications (RR = 0.26; 95% CI 0.11, 0.63; I(2) = 0%, P = 0.003), and the recurrence rate (RR = 0.14; 95% CI 0.03, 0.74; I(2) = 0%; P = 0.021) were significantly lower in the experimental group. CONCLUSION: Our systematic review and meta-analysis can prove the effectiveness and safety of ultrasound-guided acupotomy in the treatment of trigger finger, but this still needs to be verified by a clinical standard large sample test. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10498646 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104986462023-09-14 Ultrasound-guided acupotomy for trigger finger: a systematic review and meta-analysis Liang, Yong-shan Chen, Ling-yan Cui, Yao-yun Du, Chun-xiao Xu, Yun-xiang Yin, Lun-hui J Orthop Surg Res Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Trigger finger is a common condition in the hand, and ultrasound-guided acupotomy for trigger finger has been widely used in recent years. PURPOSE: This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided acupotomy for trigger finger. METHODS: We searched for relevant studies in the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Embase, PubMed, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), Wanfang Data, and other resources from their inception to January 2023. Randomized controlled trials of ultrasound-guided acupotomy for trigger finger were included. The meta-analysis was carried out using Review Manager 5.4 and Stata 15.1. RESULTS: Overall, 15 studies with 988 patients were included. The experimental group was treated with ultrasound-guided acupotomy, and the Control group received traditional acupotomy, traditional operation or injection of medication. Meta-analysis showed that the overall clinical effectiveness (OR = 4.83; 95% CI 2.49–9.37; I(2) = 73.1%; P < 0.001) in the experimental group was significantly better than that of the control group. And the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score (WMD = − 1; 95% CI − 1.24, − 0.76; I(2) = 99%; P < 0.001), the QuinneII classification (WMD = − 0.84; 95% CI − 1.28, − 0.39; I(2) = 99.1%, P < 0.001), the incidence of complications (RR = 0.26; 95% CI 0.11, 0.63; I(2) = 0%, P = 0.003), and the recurrence rate (RR = 0.14; 95% CI 0.03, 0.74; I(2) = 0%; P = 0.021) were significantly lower in the experimental group. CONCLUSION: Our systematic review and meta-analysis can prove the effectiveness and safety of ultrasound-guided acupotomy in the treatment of trigger finger, but this still needs to be verified by a clinical standard large sample test. BioMed Central 2023-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10498646/ /pubmed/37705066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04127-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Liang, Yong-shan Chen, Ling-yan Cui, Yao-yun Du, Chun-xiao Xu, Yun-xiang Yin, Lun-hui Ultrasound-guided acupotomy for trigger finger: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Ultrasound-guided acupotomy for trigger finger: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Ultrasound-guided acupotomy for trigger finger: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Ultrasound-guided acupotomy for trigger finger: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Ultrasound-guided acupotomy for trigger finger: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Ultrasound-guided acupotomy for trigger finger: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | ultrasound-guided acupotomy for trigger finger: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10498646/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37705066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04127-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liangyongshan ultrasoundguidedacupotomyfortriggerfingerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chenlingyan ultrasoundguidedacupotomyfortriggerfingerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT cuiyaoyun ultrasoundguidedacupotomyfortriggerfingerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT duchunxiao ultrasoundguidedacupotomyfortriggerfingerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT xuyunxiang ultrasoundguidedacupotomyfortriggerfingerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yinlunhui ultrasoundguidedacupotomyfortriggerfingerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |