Cargando…

Evaluating Neighborhood-Level Differences in Hair Product Safety by Environmental Working Group Ratings among Retailers in Boston, Massachusetts

BACKGROUND: Personal care products are a notable source of exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs). Racial/ethnic differences in the use of hair products containing EDCs are reported, with women and children of color more commonly using hair products that are hormonally active and contain...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chan, Marissa, Parikh, Shivani, Shyr, Derek, Shamasunder, Bhavna, Adamkiewicz, Gary, James-Todd, Tamarra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Environmental Health Perspectives 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10498863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37702490
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/EHP10653
_version_ 1785105610560241664
author Chan, Marissa
Parikh, Shivani
Shyr, Derek
Shamasunder, Bhavna
Adamkiewicz, Gary
James-Todd, Tamarra
author_facet Chan, Marissa
Parikh, Shivani
Shyr, Derek
Shamasunder, Bhavna
Adamkiewicz, Gary
James-Todd, Tamarra
author_sort Chan, Marissa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Personal care products are a notable source of exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs). Racial/ethnic differences in the use of hair products containing EDCs are reported, with women and children of color more commonly using hair products that are hormonally active and contain EDCs than other racial/ethnic groups. There is limited research examining the neighborhood-level social and economic factors that may contribute to these reported disparities. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to examine the safety of hair products across sociodemographically diverse neighborhoods in Boston, Massachusetts. METHODS: Eight neighborhoods were identified based on indicators of race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status (SES). We randomly selected 50 stores and collected data on the hair products for sale and their corresponding Environmental Working Group (EWG) Skin Deep hazard score. The association between neighborhood and EWG hazard category (low, moderate, high) was examined using a multinomial logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 14,019 hair products were identified in the eight neighborhoods. When considering products with EWG hazard scores, Roxbury, a lower income community of color, and Mission Hill, a lower income community, were reported to have a higher percentage of high-hazard hair products in comparison with Beacon Hill [12.2% (163/1,332), 11.4% (65/571) vs. 7.9% (30/382), respectively]. Differences between the safety of hair products were observed, with Roxbury and Mission Hill reporting more than a 2-fold higher risk ratio (RR) of finding hair products with high vs. low EWG scores in comparison with that of Beacon Hill [RR for Roxbury: 2.3, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.1, 4.6; RR for Mission Hill: 2.3, 95% CI: 1.0, 5.4]. Other neighborhoods were also observed to have an increased RR in comparison with Beacon Hill, however, with 95% CIs that extended beyond the null. DISCUSSION: Retail stores in neighborhoods with a higher percentage of residents of color and lower SES were found to be more likely to sell products with high hazard scores than stores in a higher SES and predominately non-Hispanic White neighborhood. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP10653
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10498863
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Environmental Health Perspectives
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104988632023-09-14 Evaluating Neighborhood-Level Differences in Hair Product Safety by Environmental Working Group Ratings among Retailers in Boston, Massachusetts Chan, Marissa Parikh, Shivani Shyr, Derek Shamasunder, Bhavna Adamkiewicz, Gary James-Todd, Tamarra Environ Health Perspect Research BACKGROUND: Personal care products are a notable source of exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs). Racial/ethnic differences in the use of hair products containing EDCs are reported, with women and children of color more commonly using hair products that are hormonally active and contain EDCs than other racial/ethnic groups. There is limited research examining the neighborhood-level social and economic factors that may contribute to these reported disparities. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to examine the safety of hair products across sociodemographically diverse neighborhoods in Boston, Massachusetts. METHODS: Eight neighborhoods were identified based on indicators of race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status (SES). We randomly selected 50 stores and collected data on the hair products for sale and their corresponding Environmental Working Group (EWG) Skin Deep hazard score. The association between neighborhood and EWG hazard category (low, moderate, high) was examined using a multinomial logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 14,019 hair products were identified in the eight neighborhoods. When considering products with EWG hazard scores, Roxbury, a lower income community of color, and Mission Hill, a lower income community, were reported to have a higher percentage of high-hazard hair products in comparison with Beacon Hill [12.2% (163/1,332), 11.4% (65/571) vs. 7.9% (30/382), respectively]. Differences between the safety of hair products were observed, with Roxbury and Mission Hill reporting more than a 2-fold higher risk ratio (RR) of finding hair products with high vs. low EWG scores in comparison with that of Beacon Hill [RR for Roxbury: 2.3, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.1, 4.6; RR for Mission Hill: 2.3, 95% CI: 1.0, 5.4]. Other neighborhoods were also observed to have an increased RR in comparison with Beacon Hill, however, with 95% CIs that extended beyond the null. DISCUSSION: Retail stores in neighborhoods with a higher percentage of residents of color and lower SES were found to be more likely to sell products with high hazard scores than stores in a higher SES and predominately non-Hispanic White neighborhood. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP10653 Environmental Health Perspectives 2023-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10498863/ /pubmed/37702490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/EHP10653 Text en https://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/about-ehp/licenseEHP is an open-access journal published with support from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health. All content is public domain unless otherwise noted.
spellingShingle Research
Chan, Marissa
Parikh, Shivani
Shyr, Derek
Shamasunder, Bhavna
Adamkiewicz, Gary
James-Todd, Tamarra
Evaluating Neighborhood-Level Differences in Hair Product Safety by Environmental Working Group Ratings among Retailers in Boston, Massachusetts
title Evaluating Neighborhood-Level Differences in Hair Product Safety by Environmental Working Group Ratings among Retailers in Boston, Massachusetts
title_full Evaluating Neighborhood-Level Differences in Hair Product Safety by Environmental Working Group Ratings among Retailers in Boston, Massachusetts
title_fullStr Evaluating Neighborhood-Level Differences in Hair Product Safety by Environmental Working Group Ratings among Retailers in Boston, Massachusetts
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating Neighborhood-Level Differences in Hair Product Safety by Environmental Working Group Ratings among Retailers in Boston, Massachusetts
title_short Evaluating Neighborhood-Level Differences in Hair Product Safety by Environmental Working Group Ratings among Retailers in Boston, Massachusetts
title_sort evaluating neighborhood-level differences in hair product safety by environmental working group ratings among retailers in boston, massachusetts
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10498863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37702490
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/EHP10653
work_keys_str_mv AT chanmarissa evaluatingneighborhoodleveldifferencesinhairproductsafetybyenvironmentalworkinggroupratingsamongretailersinbostonmassachusetts
AT parikhshivani evaluatingneighborhoodleveldifferencesinhairproductsafetybyenvironmentalworkinggroupratingsamongretailersinbostonmassachusetts
AT shyrderek evaluatingneighborhoodleveldifferencesinhairproductsafetybyenvironmentalworkinggroupratingsamongretailersinbostonmassachusetts
AT shamasunderbhavna evaluatingneighborhoodleveldifferencesinhairproductsafetybyenvironmentalworkinggroupratingsamongretailersinbostonmassachusetts
AT adamkiewiczgary evaluatingneighborhoodleveldifferencesinhairproductsafetybyenvironmentalworkinggroupratingsamongretailersinbostonmassachusetts
AT jamestoddtamarra evaluatingneighborhoodleveldifferencesinhairproductsafetybyenvironmentalworkinggroupratingsamongretailersinbostonmassachusetts