Cargando…

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor genetic polymorphism rs6265 and creativity

The protein brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) promotes neural plasticity of the central nervous system and plays an important role for learning and memory. A single nucleotide polymorphism (rs6265) at position 66 in the pro-region of the human BDNF gene, resulting in a substitution of the ami...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hertenstein, Elisabeth, Kuhn, Marion, Landmann, Nina, Maier, Jonathan-Gabriel, Schneider, Carlotta Louisa, Fehér, Kristoffer Daniel, Frase, Lukas, Riemann, Dieter, Feige, Bernd, Nissen, Christoph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10499242/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37703265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291397
_version_ 1785105665821245440
author Hertenstein, Elisabeth
Kuhn, Marion
Landmann, Nina
Maier, Jonathan-Gabriel
Schneider, Carlotta Louisa
Fehér, Kristoffer Daniel
Frase, Lukas
Riemann, Dieter
Feige, Bernd
Nissen, Christoph
author_facet Hertenstein, Elisabeth
Kuhn, Marion
Landmann, Nina
Maier, Jonathan-Gabriel
Schneider, Carlotta Louisa
Fehér, Kristoffer Daniel
Frase, Lukas
Riemann, Dieter
Feige, Bernd
Nissen, Christoph
author_sort Hertenstein, Elisabeth
collection PubMed
description The protein brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) promotes neural plasticity of the central nervous system and plays an important role for learning and memory. A single nucleotide polymorphism (rs6265) at position 66 in the pro-region of the human BDNF gene, resulting in a substitution of the amino acid valine (val) with methionine (met), leads to attenuated BDNF secretion and has been associated with reduced neurocognitive function. Inhomogeneous results have been found regarding the effect of the BDNF genotype on behavior. We determined the BDNF genotype and performance on the Compound Remote Associate (CRA) task as a common measure of creativity in 76 healthy university students. In our main analyses, we did not find significant differences between met-carriers (n = 30) and non-met carriers (n = 46). In a secondary analysis, we found that met-carriers had a slower solution time (medium effect size) for items of medium difficulty. Our results suggest that met-carriers and non-met-carriers do not generally differ regarding their creativity, but non-met-carriers may have a certain advantage when it comes to moderately difficult problems. The wider literature suggests that both genetic variants come with advantages and disadvantages. Future research needs to sharpen our understanding of the disadvantages and, potentially, advantages met allele carriers may have.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10499242
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104992422023-09-14 Brain-derived neurotrophic factor genetic polymorphism rs6265 and creativity Hertenstein, Elisabeth Kuhn, Marion Landmann, Nina Maier, Jonathan-Gabriel Schneider, Carlotta Louisa Fehér, Kristoffer Daniel Frase, Lukas Riemann, Dieter Feige, Bernd Nissen, Christoph PLoS One Research Article The protein brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) promotes neural plasticity of the central nervous system and plays an important role for learning and memory. A single nucleotide polymorphism (rs6265) at position 66 in the pro-region of the human BDNF gene, resulting in a substitution of the amino acid valine (val) with methionine (met), leads to attenuated BDNF secretion and has been associated with reduced neurocognitive function. Inhomogeneous results have been found regarding the effect of the BDNF genotype on behavior. We determined the BDNF genotype and performance on the Compound Remote Associate (CRA) task as a common measure of creativity in 76 healthy university students. In our main analyses, we did not find significant differences between met-carriers (n = 30) and non-met carriers (n = 46). In a secondary analysis, we found that met-carriers had a slower solution time (medium effect size) for items of medium difficulty. Our results suggest that met-carriers and non-met-carriers do not generally differ regarding their creativity, but non-met-carriers may have a certain advantage when it comes to moderately difficult problems. The wider literature suggests that both genetic variants come with advantages and disadvantages. Future research needs to sharpen our understanding of the disadvantages and, potentially, advantages met allele carriers may have. Public Library of Science 2023-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10499242/ /pubmed/37703265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291397 Text en © 2023 Hertenstein et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hertenstein, Elisabeth
Kuhn, Marion
Landmann, Nina
Maier, Jonathan-Gabriel
Schneider, Carlotta Louisa
Fehér, Kristoffer Daniel
Frase, Lukas
Riemann, Dieter
Feige, Bernd
Nissen, Christoph
Brain-derived neurotrophic factor genetic polymorphism rs6265 and creativity
title Brain-derived neurotrophic factor genetic polymorphism rs6265 and creativity
title_full Brain-derived neurotrophic factor genetic polymorphism rs6265 and creativity
title_fullStr Brain-derived neurotrophic factor genetic polymorphism rs6265 and creativity
title_full_unstemmed Brain-derived neurotrophic factor genetic polymorphism rs6265 and creativity
title_short Brain-derived neurotrophic factor genetic polymorphism rs6265 and creativity
title_sort brain-derived neurotrophic factor genetic polymorphism rs6265 and creativity
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10499242/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37703265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291397
work_keys_str_mv AT hertensteinelisabeth brainderivedneurotrophicfactorgeneticpolymorphismrs6265andcreativity
AT kuhnmarion brainderivedneurotrophicfactorgeneticpolymorphismrs6265andcreativity
AT landmannnina brainderivedneurotrophicfactorgeneticpolymorphismrs6265andcreativity
AT maierjonathangabriel brainderivedneurotrophicfactorgeneticpolymorphismrs6265andcreativity
AT schneidercarlottalouisa brainderivedneurotrophicfactorgeneticpolymorphismrs6265andcreativity
AT feherkristofferdaniel brainderivedneurotrophicfactorgeneticpolymorphismrs6265andcreativity
AT fraselukas brainderivedneurotrophicfactorgeneticpolymorphismrs6265andcreativity
AT riemanndieter brainderivedneurotrophicfactorgeneticpolymorphismrs6265andcreativity
AT feigebernd brainderivedneurotrophicfactorgeneticpolymorphismrs6265andcreativity
AT nissenchristoph brainderivedneurotrophicfactorgeneticpolymorphismrs6265andcreativity