Cargando…

Data‐Driven Placement of PM(2.5) Air Quality Sensors in the United States: An Approach to Target Urban Environmental Injustice

In the United States, citizens and policymakers heavily rely upon Environmental Protection Agency mandated regulatory networks to monitor air pollution; increasingly they also depend on low‐cost sensor networks to supplement spatial gaps in regulatory monitor networks coverage. Although these regula...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kelp, Makoto M., Fargiano, Timothy C., Lin, Samuel, Liu, Tianjia, Turner, Jay R., Kutz, J. Nathan, Mickley, Loretta J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10499371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37711364
http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2023GH000834
Descripción
Sumario:In the United States, citizens and policymakers heavily rely upon Environmental Protection Agency mandated regulatory networks to monitor air pollution; increasingly they also depend on low‐cost sensor networks to supplement spatial gaps in regulatory monitor networks coverage. Although these regulatory and low‐cost networks in tandem provide enhanced spatiotemporal coverage in urban areas, low‐cost sensors are located often in higher income, predominantly White areas. Such disparity in coverage may exacerbate existing inequalities and impact the ability of different communities to respond to the threat of air pollution. Here we present a study using cost‐constrained multiresolution dynamic mode decomposition (mrDMDcc) to identify the optimal and equitable placement of fine particulate matter (PM(2.5)) sensors in four U.S. cities with histories of racial or income segregation: St. Louis, Houston, Boston, and Buffalo. This novel approach incorporates the variation of PM(2.5) on timescales ranging from 1 day to over a decade to capture air pollution variability. We also introduce a cost function into the sensor placement optimization that represents the balance between our objectives of capturing PM(2.5) extremes and increasing pollution monitoring in low‐income and nonwhite areas. We find that the mrDMDcc algorithm places a greater number of sensors in historically low‐income and nonwhite neighborhoods with known environmental pollution problems compared to networks using PM(2.5) information alone. Our work provides a roadmap for the creation of equitable sensor networks in U.S. cities and offers a guide for democratizing air pollution data through increasing spatial coverage of low‐cost sensors in less privileged communities.