Cargando…
Comparison of Outcomes of Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention between Complex and High-Risk Intervention in Indicated Patients (CHIP) versus Non-CHIP
Aims: Complex and high-risk intervention in indicated patients (CHIP) is an emerging concept in the contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). CHIP is known to consist three factors, namely, (1) patient factors, (2) complicated heart disease, and (3) complex PCI. However, it remains uncl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Japan Atherosclerosis Society
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10499455/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36529503 http://dx.doi.org/10.5551/jat.63956 |
_version_ | 1785105713087905792 |
---|---|
author | Fujimoto, Yudai Sakakura, Kenichi Jinnouchi, Hiroyuki Taniguchi, Yousuke Tsukui, Takunori Watanabe, Yusuke Yamamoto, Kei Seguchi, Masaru Wada, Hiroshi Fujita, Hideo |
author_facet | Fujimoto, Yudai Sakakura, Kenichi Jinnouchi, Hiroyuki Taniguchi, Yousuke Tsukui, Takunori Watanabe, Yusuke Yamamoto, Kei Seguchi, Masaru Wada, Hiroshi Fujita, Hideo |
author_sort | Fujimoto, Yudai |
collection | PubMed |
description | Aims: Complex and high-risk intervention in indicated patients (CHIP) is an emerging concept in the contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). CHIP is known to consist three factors, namely, (1) patient factors, (2) complicated heart disease, and (3) complex PCI. However, it remains unclear whether additional CHIP factors further increase the incidence of complications in complex PCI. Thus, in this study, we aim to compare the incidence of complications among definite CHIP, possible CHIP, and non-CHIP in terms of complex PCI and to further investigate the association between CHIP and complications. Methods: The primary aim of this study was to determine the major complications in PCI. We included 989 PCI lesions and divided those into definite CHIP (n=140), possible CHIP (n=397), and the non-CHIP groups (n=452). Results: The incidence of major complications was noted to be the highest in the definite CHIP, followed by the possible CHIP, and lowest in the non-CHIP (p=0.001). The multivariate logistic regression analysis using a generalized estimating equation revealed definite CHIP (versus non-CHIP: odds ratio (OR) 2.099, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.062–4.150,p=0.033) was significantly associated with major complications after controlling for confounding factors. Another multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed immunosuppressive drugs (OR 3.040, 95% CI 1.251–7.386,p=0.014), unstable hemodynamics (OR 5.753, 95% CI 1.217–27.201,p=0.027), and frailty (OR 2.039, 95% CI 1.108–3.751,p=0.022) were significantly associated with major complications among CHIP factors. Conclusions: The incidence of major complications in complex PCI was determined to be the highest in the definite CHIP, followed by the possible CHIP and lowest in the non-CHIP. Thus, more attention should be given to the three components of CHIP to prevent major complications in complex PCI. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10499455 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Japan Atherosclerosis Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104994552023-09-14 Comparison of Outcomes of Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention between Complex and High-Risk Intervention in Indicated Patients (CHIP) versus Non-CHIP Fujimoto, Yudai Sakakura, Kenichi Jinnouchi, Hiroyuki Taniguchi, Yousuke Tsukui, Takunori Watanabe, Yusuke Yamamoto, Kei Seguchi, Masaru Wada, Hiroshi Fujita, Hideo J Atheroscler Thromb Original Article Aims: Complex and high-risk intervention in indicated patients (CHIP) is an emerging concept in the contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). CHIP is known to consist three factors, namely, (1) patient factors, (2) complicated heart disease, and (3) complex PCI. However, it remains unclear whether additional CHIP factors further increase the incidence of complications in complex PCI. Thus, in this study, we aim to compare the incidence of complications among definite CHIP, possible CHIP, and non-CHIP in terms of complex PCI and to further investigate the association between CHIP and complications. Methods: The primary aim of this study was to determine the major complications in PCI. We included 989 PCI lesions and divided those into definite CHIP (n=140), possible CHIP (n=397), and the non-CHIP groups (n=452). Results: The incidence of major complications was noted to be the highest in the definite CHIP, followed by the possible CHIP, and lowest in the non-CHIP (p=0.001). The multivariate logistic regression analysis using a generalized estimating equation revealed definite CHIP (versus non-CHIP: odds ratio (OR) 2.099, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.062–4.150,p=0.033) was significantly associated with major complications after controlling for confounding factors. Another multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed immunosuppressive drugs (OR 3.040, 95% CI 1.251–7.386,p=0.014), unstable hemodynamics (OR 5.753, 95% CI 1.217–27.201,p=0.027), and frailty (OR 2.039, 95% CI 1.108–3.751,p=0.022) were significantly associated with major complications among CHIP factors. Conclusions: The incidence of major complications in complex PCI was determined to be the highest in the definite CHIP, followed by the possible CHIP and lowest in the non-CHIP. Thus, more attention should be given to the three components of CHIP to prevent major complications in complex PCI. Japan Atherosclerosis Society 2023-09-01 2022-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10499455/ /pubmed/36529503 http://dx.doi.org/10.5551/jat.63956 Text en 2023 Japan Atherosclerosis Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the latest version of CC BY-NC-SA defined by the Creative Commons Attribution License.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Original Article Fujimoto, Yudai Sakakura, Kenichi Jinnouchi, Hiroyuki Taniguchi, Yousuke Tsukui, Takunori Watanabe, Yusuke Yamamoto, Kei Seguchi, Masaru Wada, Hiroshi Fujita, Hideo Comparison of Outcomes of Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention between Complex and High-Risk Intervention in Indicated Patients (CHIP) versus Non-CHIP |
title | Comparison of Outcomes of Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention between Complex and High-Risk Intervention in Indicated Patients (CHIP) versus Non-CHIP |
title_full | Comparison of Outcomes of Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention between Complex and High-Risk Intervention in Indicated Patients (CHIP) versus Non-CHIP |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Outcomes of Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention between Complex and High-Risk Intervention in Indicated Patients (CHIP) versus Non-CHIP |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Outcomes of Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention between Complex and High-Risk Intervention in Indicated Patients (CHIP) versus Non-CHIP |
title_short | Comparison of Outcomes of Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention between Complex and High-Risk Intervention in Indicated Patients (CHIP) versus Non-CHIP |
title_sort | comparison of outcomes of elective percutaneous coronary intervention between complex and high-risk intervention in indicated patients (chip) versus non-chip |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10499455/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36529503 http://dx.doi.org/10.5551/jat.63956 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fujimotoyudai comparisonofoutcomesofelectivepercutaneouscoronaryinterventionbetweencomplexandhighriskinterventioninindicatedpatientschipversusnonchip AT sakakurakenichi comparisonofoutcomesofelectivepercutaneouscoronaryinterventionbetweencomplexandhighriskinterventioninindicatedpatientschipversusnonchip AT jinnouchihiroyuki comparisonofoutcomesofelectivepercutaneouscoronaryinterventionbetweencomplexandhighriskinterventioninindicatedpatientschipversusnonchip AT taniguchiyousuke comparisonofoutcomesofelectivepercutaneouscoronaryinterventionbetweencomplexandhighriskinterventioninindicatedpatientschipversusnonchip AT tsukuitakunori comparisonofoutcomesofelectivepercutaneouscoronaryinterventionbetweencomplexandhighriskinterventioninindicatedpatientschipversusnonchip AT watanabeyusuke comparisonofoutcomesofelectivepercutaneouscoronaryinterventionbetweencomplexandhighriskinterventioninindicatedpatientschipversusnonchip AT yamamotokei comparisonofoutcomesofelectivepercutaneouscoronaryinterventionbetweencomplexandhighriskinterventioninindicatedpatientschipversusnonchip AT seguchimasaru comparisonofoutcomesofelectivepercutaneouscoronaryinterventionbetweencomplexandhighriskinterventioninindicatedpatientschipversusnonchip AT wadahiroshi comparisonofoutcomesofelectivepercutaneouscoronaryinterventionbetweencomplexandhighriskinterventioninindicatedpatientschipversusnonchip AT fujitahideo comparisonofoutcomesofelectivepercutaneouscoronaryinterventionbetweencomplexandhighriskinterventioninindicatedpatientschipversusnonchip |