Cargando…

Comparison of Outcomes of Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention between Complex and High-Risk Intervention in Indicated Patients (CHIP) versus Non-CHIP

Aims: Complex and high-risk intervention in indicated patients (CHIP) is an emerging concept in the contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). CHIP is known to consist three factors, namely, (1) patient factors, (2) complicated heart disease, and (3) complex PCI. However, it remains uncl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fujimoto, Yudai, Sakakura, Kenichi, Jinnouchi, Hiroyuki, Taniguchi, Yousuke, Tsukui, Takunori, Watanabe, Yusuke, Yamamoto, Kei, Seguchi, Masaru, Wada, Hiroshi, Fujita, Hideo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Japan Atherosclerosis Society 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10499455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36529503
http://dx.doi.org/10.5551/jat.63956
_version_ 1785105713087905792
author Fujimoto, Yudai
Sakakura, Kenichi
Jinnouchi, Hiroyuki
Taniguchi, Yousuke
Tsukui, Takunori
Watanabe, Yusuke
Yamamoto, Kei
Seguchi, Masaru
Wada, Hiroshi
Fujita, Hideo
author_facet Fujimoto, Yudai
Sakakura, Kenichi
Jinnouchi, Hiroyuki
Taniguchi, Yousuke
Tsukui, Takunori
Watanabe, Yusuke
Yamamoto, Kei
Seguchi, Masaru
Wada, Hiroshi
Fujita, Hideo
author_sort Fujimoto, Yudai
collection PubMed
description Aims: Complex and high-risk intervention in indicated patients (CHIP) is an emerging concept in the contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). CHIP is known to consist three factors, namely, (1) patient factors, (2) complicated heart disease, and (3) complex PCI. However, it remains unclear whether additional CHIP factors further increase the incidence of complications in complex PCI. Thus, in this study, we aim to compare the incidence of complications among definite CHIP, possible CHIP, and non-CHIP in terms of complex PCI and to further investigate the association between CHIP and complications. Methods: The primary aim of this study was to determine the major complications in PCI. We included 989 PCI lesions and divided those into definite CHIP (n=140), possible CHIP (n=397), and the non-CHIP groups (n=452). Results: The incidence of major complications was noted to be the highest in the definite CHIP, followed by the possible CHIP, and lowest in the non-CHIP (p=0.001). The multivariate logistic regression analysis using a generalized estimating equation revealed definite CHIP (versus non-CHIP: odds ratio (OR) 2.099, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.062–4.150,p=0.033) was significantly associated with major complications after controlling for confounding factors. Another multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed immunosuppressive drugs (OR 3.040, 95% CI 1.251–7.386,p=0.014), unstable hemodynamics (OR 5.753, 95% CI 1.217–27.201,p=0.027), and frailty (OR 2.039, 95% CI 1.108–3.751,p=0.022) were significantly associated with major complications among CHIP factors. Conclusions: The incidence of major complications in complex PCI was determined to be the highest in the definite CHIP, followed by the possible CHIP and lowest in the non-CHIP. Thus, more attention should be given to the three components of CHIP to prevent major complications in complex PCI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10499455
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Japan Atherosclerosis Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104994552023-09-14 Comparison of Outcomes of Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention between Complex and High-Risk Intervention in Indicated Patients (CHIP) versus Non-CHIP Fujimoto, Yudai Sakakura, Kenichi Jinnouchi, Hiroyuki Taniguchi, Yousuke Tsukui, Takunori Watanabe, Yusuke Yamamoto, Kei Seguchi, Masaru Wada, Hiroshi Fujita, Hideo J Atheroscler Thromb Original Article Aims: Complex and high-risk intervention in indicated patients (CHIP) is an emerging concept in the contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). CHIP is known to consist three factors, namely, (1) patient factors, (2) complicated heart disease, and (3) complex PCI. However, it remains unclear whether additional CHIP factors further increase the incidence of complications in complex PCI. Thus, in this study, we aim to compare the incidence of complications among definite CHIP, possible CHIP, and non-CHIP in terms of complex PCI and to further investigate the association between CHIP and complications. Methods: The primary aim of this study was to determine the major complications in PCI. We included 989 PCI lesions and divided those into definite CHIP (n=140), possible CHIP (n=397), and the non-CHIP groups (n=452). Results: The incidence of major complications was noted to be the highest in the definite CHIP, followed by the possible CHIP, and lowest in the non-CHIP (p=0.001). The multivariate logistic regression analysis using a generalized estimating equation revealed definite CHIP (versus non-CHIP: odds ratio (OR) 2.099, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.062–4.150,p=0.033) was significantly associated with major complications after controlling for confounding factors. Another multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed immunosuppressive drugs (OR 3.040, 95% CI 1.251–7.386,p=0.014), unstable hemodynamics (OR 5.753, 95% CI 1.217–27.201,p=0.027), and frailty (OR 2.039, 95% CI 1.108–3.751,p=0.022) were significantly associated with major complications among CHIP factors. Conclusions: The incidence of major complications in complex PCI was determined to be the highest in the definite CHIP, followed by the possible CHIP and lowest in the non-CHIP. Thus, more attention should be given to the three components of CHIP to prevent major complications in complex PCI. Japan Atherosclerosis Society 2023-09-01 2022-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10499455/ /pubmed/36529503 http://dx.doi.org/10.5551/jat.63956 Text en 2023 Japan Atherosclerosis Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the latest version of CC BY-NC-SA defined by the Creative Commons Attribution License.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Article
Fujimoto, Yudai
Sakakura, Kenichi
Jinnouchi, Hiroyuki
Taniguchi, Yousuke
Tsukui, Takunori
Watanabe, Yusuke
Yamamoto, Kei
Seguchi, Masaru
Wada, Hiroshi
Fujita, Hideo
Comparison of Outcomes of Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention between Complex and High-Risk Intervention in Indicated Patients (CHIP) versus Non-CHIP
title Comparison of Outcomes of Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention between Complex and High-Risk Intervention in Indicated Patients (CHIP) versus Non-CHIP
title_full Comparison of Outcomes of Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention between Complex and High-Risk Intervention in Indicated Patients (CHIP) versus Non-CHIP
title_fullStr Comparison of Outcomes of Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention between Complex and High-Risk Intervention in Indicated Patients (CHIP) versus Non-CHIP
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Outcomes of Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention between Complex and High-Risk Intervention in Indicated Patients (CHIP) versus Non-CHIP
title_short Comparison of Outcomes of Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention between Complex and High-Risk Intervention in Indicated Patients (CHIP) versus Non-CHIP
title_sort comparison of outcomes of elective percutaneous coronary intervention between complex and high-risk intervention in indicated patients (chip) versus non-chip
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10499455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36529503
http://dx.doi.org/10.5551/jat.63956
work_keys_str_mv AT fujimotoyudai comparisonofoutcomesofelectivepercutaneouscoronaryinterventionbetweencomplexandhighriskinterventioninindicatedpatientschipversusnonchip
AT sakakurakenichi comparisonofoutcomesofelectivepercutaneouscoronaryinterventionbetweencomplexandhighriskinterventioninindicatedpatientschipversusnonchip
AT jinnouchihiroyuki comparisonofoutcomesofelectivepercutaneouscoronaryinterventionbetweencomplexandhighriskinterventioninindicatedpatientschipversusnonchip
AT taniguchiyousuke comparisonofoutcomesofelectivepercutaneouscoronaryinterventionbetweencomplexandhighriskinterventioninindicatedpatientschipversusnonchip
AT tsukuitakunori comparisonofoutcomesofelectivepercutaneouscoronaryinterventionbetweencomplexandhighriskinterventioninindicatedpatientschipversusnonchip
AT watanabeyusuke comparisonofoutcomesofelectivepercutaneouscoronaryinterventionbetweencomplexandhighriskinterventioninindicatedpatientschipversusnonchip
AT yamamotokei comparisonofoutcomesofelectivepercutaneouscoronaryinterventionbetweencomplexandhighriskinterventioninindicatedpatientschipversusnonchip
AT seguchimasaru comparisonofoutcomesofelectivepercutaneouscoronaryinterventionbetweencomplexandhighriskinterventioninindicatedpatientschipversusnonchip
AT wadahiroshi comparisonofoutcomesofelectivepercutaneouscoronaryinterventionbetweencomplexandhighriskinterventioninindicatedpatientschipversusnonchip
AT fujitahideo comparisonofoutcomesofelectivepercutaneouscoronaryinterventionbetweencomplexandhighriskinterventioninindicatedpatientschipversusnonchip