Cargando…

Emotional eating: elusive or evident? Integrating laboratory, psychometric and daily life measures

PURPOSE: Emotional eating (EE) refers to eating in response to (negative) emotions. Evidence for the validity of EE is mixed: some meta-analyses find EE only in eating disordered patients, others only in restrained eaters, which suggest that only certain subgroups show EE. Furthermore, EE measures f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schnepper, Rebekka, Blechert, Jens, Arend, Ann-Kathrin, Yanagida, Takuya, Reichenberger, Julia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10499733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37702801
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40519-023-01606-8
_version_ 1785105770817257472
author Schnepper, Rebekka
Blechert, Jens
Arend, Ann-Kathrin
Yanagida, Takuya
Reichenberger, Julia
author_facet Schnepper, Rebekka
Blechert, Jens
Arend, Ann-Kathrin
Yanagida, Takuya
Reichenberger, Julia
author_sort Schnepper, Rebekka
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Emotional eating (EE) refers to eating in response to (negative) emotions. Evidence for the validity of EE is mixed: some meta-analyses find EE only in eating disordered patients, others only in restrained eaters, which suggest that only certain subgroups show EE. Furthermore, EE measures from lab-based assessments, ecological momentary assessment (EMA), and psychometric measures often diverge. This paper tested whether the covariance of these three different EE methods can be modeled through a single latent variable (factorial validity), and if so, how this variable would relate to restrained eating (construct validity), Body-Mass-Index (BMI), and subclinical eating disorder symptomatology (concurrent validity). METHODS: 102 non-eating disordered female participants with a wide BMI range completed EE measures from three methods: psychometric questionnaires, a laboratory experiment (craving ratings of food images in induced neutral vs. negative emotion) and EMA questionnaires (within-participant correlations of momentary negative emotions and momentary food cravings across 9 days). Two measures for each method were extracted and submitted to confirmatory factor analysis. RESULTS: A one-factor model provided a good fit. The resulting EE(lat) factor correlated positively with subclinical eating disorder symptoms and BMI but not with restrained eating. CONCLUSIONS: The one-factor solution shows that the EE construct can validly be assessed with three different methods. Individual differences in EE are supported by the data and are related to eating and weight problem symptomatology but not to restrained eating. This supports learning accounts of EE and underscores the relevance of the EE construct to physical and mental health. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II (Evidence obtained from well-designed controlled trials without randomization). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40519-023-01606-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10499733
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104997332023-09-15 Emotional eating: elusive or evident? Integrating laboratory, psychometric and daily life measures Schnepper, Rebekka Blechert, Jens Arend, Ann-Kathrin Yanagida, Takuya Reichenberger, Julia Eat Weight Disord Research PURPOSE: Emotional eating (EE) refers to eating in response to (negative) emotions. Evidence for the validity of EE is mixed: some meta-analyses find EE only in eating disordered patients, others only in restrained eaters, which suggest that only certain subgroups show EE. Furthermore, EE measures from lab-based assessments, ecological momentary assessment (EMA), and psychometric measures often diverge. This paper tested whether the covariance of these three different EE methods can be modeled through a single latent variable (factorial validity), and if so, how this variable would relate to restrained eating (construct validity), Body-Mass-Index (BMI), and subclinical eating disorder symptomatology (concurrent validity). METHODS: 102 non-eating disordered female participants with a wide BMI range completed EE measures from three methods: psychometric questionnaires, a laboratory experiment (craving ratings of food images in induced neutral vs. negative emotion) and EMA questionnaires (within-participant correlations of momentary negative emotions and momentary food cravings across 9 days). Two measures for each method were extracted and submitted to confirmatory factor analysis. RESULTS: A one-factor model provided a good fit. The resulting EE(lat) factor correlated positively with subclinical eating disorder symptoms and BMI but not with restrained eating. CONCLUSIONS: The one-factor solution shows that the EE construct can validly be assessed with three different methods. Individual differences in EE are supported by the data and are related to eating and weight problem symptomatology but not to restrained eating. This supports learning accounts of EE and underscores the relevance of the EE construct to physical and mental health. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II (Evidence obtained from well-designed controlled trials without randomization). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40519-023-01606-8. Springer International Publishing 2023-09-13 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10499733/ /pubmed/37702801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40519-023-01606-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Schnepper, Rebekka
Blechert, Jens
Arend, Ann-Kathrin
Yanagida, Takuya
Reichenberger, Julia
Emotional eating: elusive or evident? Integrating laboratory, psychometric and daily life measures
title Emotional eating: elusive or evident? Integrating laboratory, psychometric and daily life measures
title_full Emotional eating: elusive or evident? Integrating laboratory, psychometric and daily life measures
title_fullStr Emotional eating: elusive or evident? Integrating laboratory, psychometric and daily life measures
title_full_unstemmed Emotional eating: elusive or evident? Integrating laboratory, psychometric and daily life measures
title_short Emotional eating: elusive or evident? Integrating laboratory, psychometric and daily life measures
title_sort emotional eating: elusive or evident? integrating laboratory, psychometric and daily life measures
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10499733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37702801
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40519-023-01606-8
work_keys_str_mv AT schnepperrebekka emotionaleatingelusiveorevidentintegratinglaboratorypsychometricanddailylifemeasures
AT blechertjens emotionaleatingelusiveorevidentintegratinglaboratorypsychometricanddailylifemeasures
AT arendannkathrin emotionaleatingelusiveorevidentintegratinglaboratorypsychometricanddailylifemeasures
AT yanagidatakuya emotionaleatingelusiveorevidentintegratinglaboratorypsychometricanddailylifemeasures
AT reichenbergerjulia emotionaleatingelusiveorevidentintegratinglaboratorypsychometricanddailylifemeasures