Cargando…

Phase 3 Clinical Trial Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Netarsudil to Ripasudil in Patients with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension: Japan Rho Kinase Elevated Intraocular Pressure Treatment Trial (J-ROCKET)

INTRODUCTION: A clinical trial evaluated ocular hypotensive efficacy and safety of netarsudil 0.02% once daily (QD) relative to ripasudil 0.4% twice daily (BID). METHODS: This was a single-masked, randomized, phase 3, superiority study. Japanese patients were randomized to either the netarsudil 0.02...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Araie, Makoto, Sugiyama, Kazuhisa, Aso, Kenji, Kanemoto, Koji, Iwata, Ryo, Hollander, David A., Senchyna, Michelle, Kopczynski, Casey C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10499948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37603205
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-023-02550-w
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: A clinical trial evaluated ocular hypotensive efficacy and safety of netarsudil 0.02% once daily (QD) relative to ripasudil 0.4% twice daily (BID). METHODS: This was a single-masked, randomized, phase 3, superiority study. Japanese patients were randomized to either the netarsudil 0.02% group or the ripasudil 0.4% group in a 1:1 ratio and treated for 4 weeks. The primary efficacy variable was mean diurnal intraocular pressure (IOP) (average of diurnal time points at 09:00, 11:00, and 16:00) at Week 4. RESULTS: A total of 245 patients were included in the primary analysis. At Week 4, least squares (LS) mean of diurnal IOP adjusted for baseline was 15.96 and 17.71 mmHg in the netarsudil 0.02% and ripasudil 0.4% groups, respectively, demonstrating the superiority of netarsudil 0.02% QD over ripasudil 0.4% BID by a margin of − 1.74 mmHg (p < 0.0001). Mean reduction from baseline in mean diurnal IOP at Week 4 was 4.65 and 2.98 mmHg, respectively. Adverse events (AEs) occurred less frequently in netarsudil 0.02% than in ripasudil 0.4%, with the incidence of ocular AEs being 59.8% and 66.7%, respectively. The most frequently reported AE was conjunctival hyperemia in both groups, with an incidence of 54.9% and 62.6%, respectively. No serious eye-related AEs were reported. CONCLUSION: Netarsudil ophthalmic solution 0.02% dosed QD (p.m.) was well tolerated and more effective in reducing IOP than ripasudil ophthalmic solution 0.4% dosed BID. Netarsudil 0.02% QD may become an important option for the treatment of Japanese patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT). TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT04620135. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-023-02550-w.