Cargando…

A recommended preclinical extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation model for neurological outcomes: A scoping review

BACKGROUND: Despite the high prevalence of neurological complications and mortality associated with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), neurologically-focused animal models are scarce. Our objective is to review current ECPR models investigating neurological outcomes and identify ke...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kook Kang, Jin, Kalra, Andrew, Ameen Ahmad, Syed, Kumar Menta, Arjun, Rando, Hannah J., Chinedozi, Ifeanyi, Darby, Zachary, Spann, Marcus, Keller, Steven P., J. R. Whitman, Glenn, Cho, Sung-Min
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10500026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37719942
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100424
_version_ 1785105838294171648
author Kook Kang, Jin
Kalra, Andrew
Ameen Ahmad, Syed
Kumar Menta, Arjun
Rando, Hannah J.
Chinedozi, Ifeanyi
Darby, Zachary
Spann, Marcus
Keller, Steven P.
J. R. Whitman, Glenn
Cho, Sung-Min
author_facet Kook Kang, Jin
Kalra, Andrew
Ameen Ahmad, Syed
Kumar Menta, Arjun
Rando, Hannah J.
Chinedozi, Ifeanyi
Darby, Zachary
Spann, Marcus
Keller, Steven P.
J. R. Whitman, Glenn
Cho, Sung-Min
author_sort Kook Kang, Jin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite the high prevalence of neurological complications and mortality associated with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), neurologically-focused animal models are scarce. Our objective is to review current ECPR models investigating neurological outcomes and identify key elements for a recommended model. METHODS: We searched PubMed and four other engines for animal ECPR studies examining neurological outcomes. Inclusion criteria were: animals experiencing cardiac arrest, ECPR/ECMO interventions, comparisons of short versus long cardiac arrest times, and neurological outcomes. RESULTS: Among 20 identified ECPR animal studies (n = 442), 13 pigs, 4 dogs, and 3 rats were used. Only 10% (2/20) included both sexes. Significant heterogeneity was observed in experimental protocols. 90% (18/20) employed peripheral VA-ECMO cannulation and 55% (11/20) were survival models (median survival = 168 hours; ECMO duration = 60 minutes). Ventricular fibrillation (18/20, 90%) was the most common method for inducing cardiac arrest with a median duration of 15 minutes (IQR = 6–20). In two studies, cardiac arrests exceeding 15 minutes led to considerable mortality and neurological impairment. Among seven studies utilizing neuromonitoring tools, only four employed multimodal devices to evaluate cerebral blood flow using Transcranial Doppler ultrasound and near-infrared spectroscopy, brain tissue oxygenation, and intracranial pressure. None examined cerebral autoregulation or neurovascular coupling. CONCLUSIONS: The substantial heterogeneity in ECPR preclinical model protocols leads to limited reproducibility and multiple challenges. The recommended model includes large animals with both sexes, standardized pre-operative protocols, a cardiac arrest time between 10–15 minutes, use of multimodal methods to evaluate neurological outcomes, and the ability to survive animals after conducting experiments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10500026
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105000262023-09-15 A recommended preclinical extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation model for neurological outcomes: A scoping review Kook Kang, Jin Kalra, Andrew Ameen Ahmad, Syed Kumar Menta, Arjun Rando, Hannah J. Chinedozi, Ifeanyi Darby, Zachary Spann, Marcus Keller, Steven P. J. R. Whitman, Glenn Cho, Sung-Min Resusc Plus Review BACKGROUND: Despite the high prevalence of neurological complications and mortality associated with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), neurologically-focused animal models are scarce. Our objective is to review current ECPR models investigating neurological outcomes and identify key elements for a recommended model. METHODS: We searched PubMed and four other engines for animal ECPR studies examining neurological outcomes. Inclusion criteria were: animals experiencing cardiac arrest, ECPR/ECMO interventions, comparisons of short versus long cardiac arrest times, and neurological outcomes. RESULTS: Among 20 identified ECPR animal studies (n = 442), 13 pigs, 4 dogs, and 3 rats were used. Only 10% (2/20) included both sexes. Significant heterogeneity was observed in experimental protocols. 90% (18/20) employed peripheral VA-ECMO cannulation and 55% (11/20) were survival models (median survival = 168 hours; ECMO duration = 60 minutes). Ventricular fibrillation (18/20, 90%) was the most common method for inducing cardiac arrest with a median duration of 15 minutes (IQR = 6–20). In two studies, cardiac arrests exceeding 15 minutes led to considerable mortality and neurological impairment. Among seven studies utilizing neuromonitoring tools, only four employed multimodal devices to evaluate cerebral blood flow using Transcranial Doppler ultrasound and near-infrared spectroscopy, brain tissue oxygenation, and intracranial pressure. None examined cerebral autoregulation or neurovascular coupling. CONCLUSIONS: The substantial heterogeneity in ECPR preclinical model protocols leads to limited reproducibility and multiple challenges. The recommended model includes large animals with both sexes, standardized pre-operative protocols, a cardiac arrest time between 10–15 minutes, use of multimodal methods to evaluate neurological outcomes, and the ability to survive animals after conducting experiments. Elsevier 2023-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10500026/ /pubmed/37719942 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100424 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Kook Kang, Jin
Kalra, Andrew
Ameen Ahmad, Syed
Kumar Menta, Arjun
Rando, Hannah J.
Chinedozi, Ifeanyi
Darby, Zachary
Spann, Marcus
Keller, Steven P.
J. R. Whitman, Glenn
Cho, Sung-Min
A recommended preclinical extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation model for neurological outcomes: A scoping review
title A recommended preclinical extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation model for neurological outcomes: A scoping review
title_full A recommended preclinical extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation model for neurological outcomes: A scoping review
title_fullStr A recommended preclinical extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation model for neurological outcomes: A scoping review
title_full_unstemmed A recommended preclinical extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation model for neurological outcomes: A scoping review
title_short A recommended preclinical extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation model for neurological outcomes: A scoping review
title_sort recommended preclinical extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation model for neurological outcomes: a scoping review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10500026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37719942
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100424
work_keys_str_mv AT kookkangjin arecommendedpreclinicalextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationmodelforneurologicaloutcomesascopingreview
AT kalraandrew arecommendedpreclinicalextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationmodelforneurologicaloutcomesascopingreview
AT ameenahmadsyed arecommendedpreclinicalextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationmodelforneurologicaloutcomesascopingreview
AT kumarmentaarjun arecommendedpreclinicalextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationmodelforneurologicaloutcomesascopingreview
AT randohannahj arecommendedpreclinicalextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationmodelforneurologicaloutcomesascopingreview
AT chinedoziifeanyi arecommendedpreclinicalextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationmodelforneurologicaloutcomesascopingreview
AT darbyzachary arecommendedpreclinicalextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationmodelforneurologicaloutcomesascopingreview
AT spannmarcus arecommendedpreclinicalextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationmodelforneurologicaloutcomesascopingreview
AT kellerstevenp arecommendedpreclinicalextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationmodelforneurologicaloutcomesascopingreview
AT jrwhitmanglenn arecommendedpreclinicalextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationmodelforneurologicaloutcomesascopingreview
AT chosungmin arecommendedpreclinicalextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationmodelforneurologicaloutcomesascopingreview
AT kookkangjin recommendedpreclinicalextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationmodelforneurologicaloutcomesascopingreview
AT kalraandrew recommendedpreclinicalextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationmodelforneurologicaloutcomesascopingreview
AT ameenahmadsyed recommendedpreclinicalextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationmodelforneurologicaloutcomesascopingreview
AT kumarmentaarjun recommendedpreclinicalextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationmodelforneurologicaloutcomesascopingreview
AT randohannahj recommendedpreclinicalextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationmodelforneurologicaloutcomesascopingreview
AT chinedoziifeanyi recommendedpreclinicalextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationmodelforneurologicaloutcomesascopingreview
AT darbyzachary recommendedpreclinicalextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationmodelforneurologicaloutcomesascopingreview
AT spannmarcus recommendedpreclinicalextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationmodelforneurologicaloutcomesascopingreview
AT kellerstevenp recommendedpreclinicalextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationmodelforneurologicaloutcomesascopingreview
AT jrwhitmanglenn recommendedpreclinicalextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationmodelforneurologicaloutcomesascopingreview
AT chosungmin recommendedpreclinicalextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationmodelforneurologicaloutcomesascopingreview