Cargando…
A recommended preclinical extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation model for neurological outcomes: A scoping review
BACKGROUND: Despite the high prevalence of neurological complications and mortality associated with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), neurologically-focused animal models are scarce. Our objective is to review current ECPR models investigating neurological outcomes and identify ke...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10500026/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37719942 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100424 |
_version_ | 1785105838294171648 |
---|---|
author | Kook Kang, Jin Kalra, Andrew Ameen Ahmad, Syed Kumar Menta, Arjun Rando, Hannah J. Chinedozi, Ifeanyi Darby, Zachary Spann, Marcus Keller, Steven P. J. R. Whitman, Glenn Cho, Sung-Min |
author_facet | Kook Kang, Jin Kalra, Andrew Ameen Ahmad, Syed Kumar Menta, Arjun Rando, Hannah J. Chinedozi, Ifeanyi Darby, Zachary Spann, Marcus Keller, Steven P. J. R. Whitman, Glenn Cho, Sung-Min |
author_sort | Kook Kang, Jin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Despite the high prevalence of neurological complications and mortality associated with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), neurologically-focused animal models are scarce. Our objective is to review current ECPR models investigating neurological outcomes and identify key elements for a recommended model. METHODS: We searched PubMed and four other engines for animal ECPR studies examining neurological outcomes. Inclusion criteria were: animals experiencing cardiac arrest, ECPR/ECMO interventions, comparisons of short versus long cardiac arrest times, and neurological outcomes. RESULTS: Among 20 identified ECPR animal studies (n = 442), 13 pigs, 4 dogs, and 3 rats were used. Only 10% (2/20) included both sexes. Significant heterogeneity was observed in experimental protocols. 90% (18/20) employed peripheral VA-ECMO cannulation and 55% (11/20) were survival models (median survival = 168 hours; ECMO duration = 60 minutes). Ventricular fibrillation (18/20, 90%) was the most common method for inducing cardiac arrest with a median duration of 15 minutes (IQR = 6–20). In two studies, cardiac arrests exceeding 15 minutes led to considerable mortality and neurological impairment. Among seven studies utilizing neuromonitoring tools, only four employed multimodal devices to evaluate cerebral blood flow using Transcranial Doppler ultrasound and near-infrared spectroscopy, brain tissue oxygenation, and intracranial pressure. None examined cerebral autoregulation or neurovascular coupling. CONCLUSIONS: The substantial heterogeneity in ECPR preclinical model protocols leads to limited reproducibility and multiple challenges. The recommended model includes large animals with both sexes, standardized pre-operative protocols, a cardiac arrest time between 10–15 minutes, use of multimodal methods to evaluate neurological outcomes, and the ability to survive animals after conducting experiments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10500026 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105000262023-09-15 A recommended preclinical extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation model for neurological outcomes: A scoping review Kook Kang, Jin Kalra, Andrew Ameen Ahmad, Syed Kumar Menta, Arjun Rando, Hannah J. Chinedozi, Ifeanyi Darby, Zachary Spann, Marcus Keller, Steven P. J. R. Whitman, Glenn Cho, Sung-Min Resusc Plus Review BACKGROUND: Despite the high prevalence of neurological complications and mortality associated with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), neurologically-focused animal models are scarce. Our objective is to review current ECPR models investigating neurological outcomes and identify key elements for a recommended model. METHODS: We searched PubMed and four other engines for animal ECPR studies examining neurological outcomes. Inclusion criteria were: animals experiencing cardiac arrest, ECPR/ECMO interventions, comparisons of short versus long cardiac arrest times, and neurological outcomes. RESULTS: Among 20 identified ECPR animal studies (n = 442), 13 pigs, 4 dogs, and 3 rats were used. Only 10% (2/20) included both sexes. Significant heterogeneity was observed in experimental protocols. 90% (18/20) employed peripheral VA-ECMO cannulation and 55% (11/20) were survival models (median survival = 168 hours; ECMO duration = 60 minutes). Ventricular fibrillation (18/20, 90%) was the most common method for inducing cardiac arrest with a median duration of 15 minutes (IQR = 6–20). In two studies, cardiac arrests exceeding 15 minutes led to considerable mortality and neurological impairment. Among seven studies utilizing neuromonitoring tools, only four employed multimodal devices to evaluate cerebral blood flow using Transcranial Doppler ultrasound and near-infrared spectroscopy, brain tissue oxygenation, and intracranial pressure. None examined cerebral autoregulation or neurovascular coupling. CONCLUSIONS: The substantial heterogeneity in ECPR preclinical model protocols leads to limited reproducibility and multiple challenges. The recommended model includes large animals with both sexes, standardized pre-operative protocols, a cardiac arrest time between 10–15 minutes, use of multimodal methods to evaluate neurological outcomes, and the ability to survive animals after conducting experiments. Elsevier 2023-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10500026/ /pubmed/37719942 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100424 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Kook Kang, Jin Kalra, Andrew Ameen Ahmad, Syed Kumar Menta, Arjun Rando, Hannah J. Chinedozi, Ifeanyi Darby, Zachary Spann, Marcus Keller, Steven P. J. R. Whitman, Glenn Cho, Sung-Min A recommended preclinical extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation model for neurological outcomes: A scoping review |
title | A recommended preclinical extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation model for neurological outcomes: A scoping review |
title_full | A recommended preclinical extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation model for neurological outcomes: A scoping review |
title_fullStr | A recommended preclinical extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation model for neurological outcomes: A scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | A recommended preclinical extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation model for neurological outcomes: A scoping review |
title_short | A recommended preclinical extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation model for neurological outcomes: A scoping review |
title_sort | recommended preclinical extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation model for neurological outcomes: a scoping review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10500026/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37719942 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100424 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kookkangjin arecommendedpreclinicalextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationmodelforneurologicaloutcomesascopingreview AT kalraandrew arecommendedpreclinicalextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationmodelforneurologicaloutcomesascopingreview AT ameenahmadsyed arecommendedpreclinicalextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationmodelforneurologicaloutcomesascopingreview AT kumarmentaarjun arecommendedpreclinicalextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationmodelforneurologicaloutcomesascopingreview AT randohannahj arecommendedpreclinicalextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationmodelforneurologicaloutcomesascopingreview AT chinedoziifeanyi arecommendedpreclinicalextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationmodelforneurologicaloutcomesascopingreview AT darbyzachary arecommendedpreclinicalextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationmodelforneurologicaloutcomesascopingreview AT spannmarcus arecommendedpreclinicalextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationmodelforneurologicaloutcomesascopingreview AT kellerstevenp arecommendedpreclinicalextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationmodelforneurologicaloutcomesascopingreview AT jrwhitmanglenn arecommendedpreclinicalextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationmodelforneurologicaloutcomesascopingreview AT chosungmin arecommendedpreclinicalextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationmodelforneurologicaloutcomesascopingreview AT kookkangjin recommendedpreclinicalextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationmodelforneurologicaloutcomesascopingreview AT kalraandrew recommendedpreclinicalextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationmodelforneurologicaloutcomesascopingreview AT ameenahmadsyed recommendedpreclinicalextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationmodelforneurologicaloutcomesascopingreview AT kumarmentaarjun recommendedpreclinicalextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationmodelforneurologicaloutcomesascopingreview AT randohannahj recommendedpreclinicalextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationmodelforneurologicaloutcomesascopingreview AT chinedoziifeanyi recommendedpreclinicalextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationmodelforneurologicaloutcomesascopingreview AT darbyzachary recommendedpreclinicalextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationmodelforneurologicaloutcomesascopingreview AT spannmarcus recommendedpreclinicalextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationmodelforneurologicaloutcomesascopingreview AT kellerstevenp recommendedpreclinicalextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationmodelforneurologicaloutcomesascopingreview AT jrwhitmanglenn recommendedpreclinicalextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationmodelforneurologicaloutcomesascopingreview AT chosungmin recommendedpreclinicalextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationmodelforneurologicaloutcomesascopingreview |