Cargando…
Surface guidance compared with ultrasound-based monitoring and diaphragm position in cone-beam computed tomography during abdominal stereotactic radiotherapy in breath-hold
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Spirometry induced deep-inspiration-breath-hold (DIBH) reduces intrafractional motion during upper abdominal stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate whether surface scanning (SGRT) is an adequate surrogate for monitoring residu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10500027/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37720462 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2023.100455 |
_version_ | 1785105838519615488 |
---|---|
author | Kaestner, Lena Streb, Lara Hetjens, Svetlana Buergy, Daniel Sihono, Dwi S.K. Fleckenstein, Jens Kalisch, Iris Eckl, Miriam Giordano, Frank A. Lohr, Frank Stieler, Florian Boda-Heggemann, Judit |
author_facet | Kaestner, Lena Streb, Lara Hetjens, Svetlana Buergy, Daniel Sihono, Dwi S.K. Fleckenstein, Jens Kalisch, Iris Eckl, Miriam Giordano, Frank A. Lohr, Frank Stieler, Florian Boda-Heggemann, Judit |
author_sort | Kaestner, Lena |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Spirometry induced deep-inspiration-breath-hold (DIBH) reduces intrafractional motion during upper abdominal stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate whether surface scanning (SGRT) is an adequate surrogate for monitoring residual internal motion during DIBH. Residual motion detected by SGRT was compared with experimental 4D-ultrasound (US) and an internal motion detection benchmark (diaphragm-dome-position in kV cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) projections). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Intrafractional monitoring was performed with SGRT and US in 460 DIBHs of 12 patients. Residual motion detected by all modalities (SGRT (anterior-posterior (AP)), US (AP, craniocaudal (CC)) and CBCT (CC)) was analyzed. Agreement analysis included Wilcoxon signed rank test, Maloney and Rastogi’s test, Pearson’s correlation coefficient (PCC) and interclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: Interquartile range was 0.7 mm (US(AP)), 0.8 mm (US(CC)), 0.9 mm (SGRT) and 0.8 mm (CBCT). SGRT(AP) vs. CBCT(CC) and US(CC) vs. CBCT(CC) showed comparable agreement (PCCs 0.53 and 0.52, ICCs 0.51 and 0.49) with slightly higher precision of CBCT(CC). Most agreement was observed for SGRT(AP) vs. US(AP) with largest PCC (0.61) and ICC (0.60), least agreement for SGRT(AP) vs. US(CC) with smallest PCC (0.44) and ICC (0.42). CONCLUSIONS: Residual motion detected during spirometry induced DIBH is small. SGRT alone is no sufficient surrogate for residual internal motion in all patients as some high velocity motion could not be detected. Observed patient-specific residual errors may require individualized PTV-margins. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10500027 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105000272023-09-15 Surface guidance compared with ultrasound-based monitoring and diaphragm position in cone-beam computed tomography during abdominal stereotactic radiotherapy in breath-hold Kaestner, Lena Streb, Lara Hetjens, Svetlana Buergy, Daniel Sihono, Dwi S.K. Fleckenstein, Jens Kalisch, Iris Eckl, Miriam Giordano, Frank A. Lohr, Frank Stieler, Florian Boda-Heggemann, Judit Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Original Research Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Spirometry induced deep-inspiration-breath-hold (DIBH) reduces intrafractional motion during upper abdominal stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate whether surface scanning (SGRT) is an adequate surrogate for monitoring residual internal motion during DIBH. Residual motion detected by SGRT was compared with experimental 4D-ultrasound (US) and an internal motion detection benchmark (diaphragm-dome-position in kV cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) projections). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Intrafractional monitoring was performed with SGRT and US in 460 DIBHs of 12 patients. Residual motion detected by all modalities (SGRT (anterior-posterior (AP)), US (AP, craniocaudal (CC)) and CBCT (CC)) was analyzed. Agreement analysis included Wilcoxon signed rank test, Maloney and Rastogi’s test, Pearson’s correlation coefficient (PCC) and interclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: Interquartile range was 0.7 mm (US(AP)), 0.8 mm (US(CC)), 0.9 mm (SGRT) and 0.8 mm (CBCT). SGRT(AP) vs. CBCT(CC) and US(CC) vs. CBCT(CC) showed comparable agreement (PCCs 0.53 and 0.52, ICCs 0.51 and 0.49) with slightly higher precision of CBCT(CC). Most agreement was observed for SGRT(AP) vs. US(AP) with largest PCC (0.61) and ICC (0.60), least agreement for SGRT(AP) vs. US(CC) with smallest PCC (0.44) and ICC (0.42). CONCLUSIONS: Residual motion detected during spirometry induced DIBH is small. SGRT alone is no sufficient surrogate for residual internal motion in all patients as some high velocity motion could not be detected. Observed patient-specific residual errors may require individualized PTV-margins. Elsevier 2023-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10500027/ /pubmed/37720462 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2023.100455 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Kaestner, Lena Streb, Lara Hetjens, Svetlana Buergy, Daniel Sihono, Dwi S.K. Fleckenstein, Jens Kalisch, Iris Eckl, Miriam Giordano, Frank A. Lohr, Frank Stieler, Florian Boda-Heggemann, Judit Surface guidance compared with ultrasound-based monitoring and diaphragm position in cone-beam computed tomography during abdominal stereotactic radiotherapy in breath-hold |
title | Surface guidance compared with ultrasound-based monitoring and diaphragm position in cone-beam computed tomography during abdominal stereotactic radiotherapy in breath-hold |
title_full | Surface guidance compared with ultrasound-based monitoring and diaphragm position in cone-beam computed tomography during abdominal stereotactic radiotherapy in breath-hold |
title_fullStr | Surface guidance compared with ultrasound-based monitoring and diaphragm position in cone-beam computed tomography during abdominal stereotactic radiotherapy in breath-hold |
title_full_unstemmed | Surface guidance compared with ultrasound-based monitoring and diaphragm position in cone-beam computed tomography during abdominal stereotactic radiotherapy in breath-hold |
title_short | Surface guidance compared with ultrasound-based monitoring and diaphragm position in cone-beam computed tomography during abdominal stereotactic radiotherapy in breath-hold |
title_sort | surface guidance compared with ultrasound-based monitoring and diaphragm position in cone-beam computed tomography during abdominal stereotactic radiotherapy in breath-hold |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10500027/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37720462 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2023.100455 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kaestnerlena surfaceguidancecomparedwithultrasoundbasedmonitoringanddiaphragmpositioninconebeamcomputedtomographyduringabdominalstereotacticradiotherapyinbreathhold AT streblara surfaceguidancecomparedwithultrasoundbasedmonitoringanddiaphragmpositioninconebeamcomputedtomographyduringabdominalstereotacticradiotherapyinbreathhold AT hetjenssvetlana surfaceguidancecomparedwithultrasoundbasedmonitoringanddiaphragmpositioninconebeamcomputedtomographyduringabdominalstereotacticradiotherapyinbreathhold AT buergydaniel surfaceguidancecomparedwithultrasoundbasedmonitoringanddiaphragmpositioninconebeamcomputedtomographyduringabdominalstereotacticradiotherapyinbreathhold AT sihonodwisk surfaceguidancecomparedwithultrasoundbasedmonitoringanddiaphragmpositioninconebeamcomputedtomographyduringabdominalstereotacticradiotherapyinbreathhold AT fleckensteinjens surfaceguidancecomparedwithultrasoundbasedmonitoringanddiaphragmpositioninconebeamcomputedtomographyduringabdominalstereotacticradiotherapyinbreathhold AT kalischiris surfaceguidancecomparedwithultrasoundbasedmonitoringanddiaphragmpositioninconebeamcomputedtomographyduringabdominalstereotacticradiotherapyinbreathhold AT ecklmiriam surfaceguidancecomparedwithultrasoundbasedmonitoringanddiaphragmpositioninconebeamcomputedtomographyduringabdominalstereotacticradiotherapyinbreathhold AT giordanofranka surfaceguidancecomparedwithultrasoundbasedmonitoringanddiaphragmpositioninconebeamcomputedtomographyduringabdominalstereotacticradiotherapyinbreathhold AT lohrfrank surfaceguidancecomparedwithultrasoundbasedmonitoringanddiaphragmpositioninconebeamcomputedtomographyduringabdominalstereotacticradiotherapyinbreathhold AT stielerflorian surfaceguidancecomparedwithultrasoundbasedmonitoringanddiaphragmpositioninconebeamcomputedtomographyduringabdominalstereotacticradiotherapyinbreathhold AT bodaheggemannjudit surfaceguidancecomparedwithultrasoundbasedmonitoringanddiaphragmpositioninconebeamcomputedtomographyduringabdominalstereotacticradiotherapyinbreathhold |