Cargando…

Surface guidance compared with ultrasound-based monitoring and diaphragm position in cone-beam computed tomography during abdominal stereotactic radiotherapy in breath-hold

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Spirometry induced deep-inspiration-breath-hold (DIBH) reduces intrafractional motion during upper abdominal stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate whether surface scanning (SGRT) is an adequate surrogate for monitoring residu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaestner, Lena, Streb, Lara, Hetjens, Svetlana, Buergy, Daniel, Sihono, Dwi S.K., Fleckenstein, Jens, Kalisch, Iris, Eckl, Miriam, Giordano, Frank A., Lohr, Frank, Stieler, Florian, Boda-Heggemann, Judit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10500027/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37720462
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2023.100455
_version_ 1785105838519615488
author Kaestner, Lena
Streb, Lara
Hetjens, Svetlana
Buergy, Daniel
Sihono, Dwi S.K.
Fleckenstein, Jens
Kalisch, Iris
Eckl, Miriam
Giordano, Frank A.
Lohr, Frank
Stieler, Florian
Boda-Heggemann, Judit
author_facet Kaestner, Lena
Streb, Lara
Hetjens, Svetlana
Buergy, Daniel
Sihono, Dwi S.K.
Fleckenstein, Jens
Kalisch, Iris
Eckl, Miriam
Giordano, Frank A.
Lohr, Frank
Stieler, Florian
Boda-Heggemann, Judit
author_sort Kaestner, Lena
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Spirometry induced deep-inspiration-breath-hold (DIBH) reduces intrafractional motion during upper abdominal stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate whether surface scanning (SGRT) is an adequate surrogate for monitoring residual internal motion during DIBH. Residual motion detected by SGRT was compared with experimental 4D-ultrasound (US) and an internal motion detection benchmark (diaphragm-dome-position in kV cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) projections). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Intrafractional monitoring was performed with SGRT and US in 460 DIBHs of 12 patients. Residual motion detected by all modalities (SGRT (anterior-posterior (AP)), US (AP, craniocaudal (CC)) and CBCT (CC)) was analyzed. Agreement analysis included Wilcoxon signed rank test, Maloney and Rastogi’s test, Pearson’s correlation coefficient (PCC) and interclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: Interquartile range was 0.7 mm (US(AP)), 0.8 mm (US(CC)), 0.9 mm (SGRT) and 0.8 mm (CBCT). SGRT(AP) vs. CBCT(CC) and US(CC) vs. CBCT(CC) showed comparable agreement (PCCs 0.53 and 0.52, ICCs 0.51 and 0.49) with slightly higher precision of CBCT(CC). Most agreement was observed for SGRT(AP) vs. US(AP) with largest PCC (0.61) and ICC (0.60), least agreement for SGRT(AP) vs. US(CC) with smallest PCC (0.44) and ICC (0.42). CONCLUSIONS: Residual motion detected during spirometry induced DIBH is small. SGRT alone is no sufficient surrogate for residual internal motion in all patients as some high velocity motion could not be detected. Observed patient-specific residual errors may require individualized PTV-margins.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10500027
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105000272023-09-15 Surface guidance compared with ultrasound-based monitoring and diaphragm position in cone-beam computed tomography during abdominal stereotactic radiotherapy in breath-hold Kaestner, Lena Streb, Lara Hetjens, Svetlana Buergy, Daniel Sihono, Dwi S.K. Fleckenstein, Jens Kalisch, Iris Eckl, Miriam Giordano, Frank A. Lohr, Frank Stieler, Florian Boda-Heggemann, Judit Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Original Research Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Spirometry induced deep-inspiration-breath-hold (DIBH) reduces intrafractional motion during upper abdominal stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate whether surface scanning (SGRT) is an adequate surrogate for monitoring residual internal motion during DIBH. Residual motion detected by SGRT was compared with experimental 4D-ultrasound (US) and an internal motion detection benchmark (diaphragm-dome-position in kV cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) projections). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Intrafractional monitoring was performed with SGRT and US in 460 DIBHs of 12 patients. Residual motion detected by all modalities (SGRT (anterior-posterior (AP)), US (AP, craniocaudal (CC)) and CBCT (CC)) was analyzed. Agreement analysis included Wilcoxon signed rank test, Maloney and Rastogi’s test, Pearson’s correlation coefficient (PCC) and interclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: Interquartile range was 0.7 mm (US(AP)), 0.8 mm (US(CC)), 0.9 mm (SGRT) and 0.8 mm (CBCT). SGRT(AP) vs. CBCT(CC) and US(CC) vs. CBCT(CC) showed comparable agreement (PCCs 0.53 and 0.52, ICCs 0.51 and 0.49) with slightly higher precision of CBCT(CC). Most agreement was observed for SGRT(AP) vs. US(AP) with largest PCC (0.61) and ICC (0.60), least agreement for SGRT(AP) vs. US(CC) with smallest PCC (0.44) and ICC (0.42). CONCLUSIONS: Residual motion detected during spirometry induced DIBH is small. SGRT alone is no sufficient surrogate for residual internal motion in all patients as some high velocity motion could not be detected. Observed patient-specific residual errors may require individualized PTV-margins. Elsevier 2023-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10500027/ /pubmed/37720462 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2023.100455 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Kaestner, Lena
Streb, Lara
Hetjens, Svetlana
Buergy, Daniel
Sihono, Dwi S.K.
Fleckenstein, Jens
Kalisch, Iris
Eckl, Miriam
Giordano, Frank A.
Lohr, Frank
Stieler, Florian
Boda-Heggemann, Judit
Surface guidance compared with ultrasound-based monitoring and diaphragm position in cone-beam computed tomography during abdominal stereotactic radiotherapy in breath-hold
title Surface guidance compared with ultrasound-based monitoring and diaphragm position in cone-beam computed tomography during abdominal stereotactic radiotherapy in breath-hold
title_full Surface guidance compared with ultrasound-based monitoring and diaphragm position in cone-beam computed tomography during abdominal stereotactic radiotherapy in breath-hold
title_fullStr Surface guidance compared with ultrasound-based monitoring and diaphragm position in cone-beam computed tomography during abdominal stereotactic radiotherapy in breath-hold
title_full_unstemmed Surface guidance compared with ultrasound-based monitoring and diaphragm position in cone-beam computed tomography during abdominal stereotactic radiotherapy in breath-hold
title_short Surface guidance compared with ultrasound-based monitoring and diaphragm position in cone-beam computed tomography during abdominal stereotactic radiotherapy in breath-hold
title_sort surface guidance compared with ultrasound-based monitoring and diaphragm position in cone-beam computed tomography during abdominal stereotactic radiotherapy in breath-hold
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10500027/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37720462
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2023.100455
work_keys_str_mv AT kaestnerlena surfaceguidancecomparedwithultrasoundbasedmonitoringanddiaphragmpositioninconebeamcomputedtomographyduringabdominalstereotacticradiotherapyinbreathhold
AT streblara surfaceguidancecomparedwithultrasoundbasedmonitoringanddiaphragmpositioninconebeamcomputedtomographyduringabdominalstereotacticradiotherapyinbreathhold
AT hetjenssvetlana surfaceguidancecomparedwithultrasoundbasedmonitoringanddiaphragmpositioninconebeamcomputedtomographyduringabdominalstereotacticradiotherapyinbreathhold
AT buergydaniel surfaceguidancecomparedwithultrasoundbasedmonitoringanddiaphragmpositioninconebeamcomputedtomographyduringabdominalstereotacticradiotherapyinbreathhold
AT sihonodwisk surfaceguidancecomparedwithultrasoundbasedmonitoringanddiaphragmpositioninconebeamcomputedtomographyduringabdominalstereotacticradiotherapyinbreathhold
AT fleckensteinjens surfaceguidancecomparedwithultrasoundbasedmonitoringanddiaphragmpositioninconebeamcomputedtomographyduringabdominalstereotacticradiotherapyinbreathhold
AT kalischiris surfaceguidancecomparedwithultrasoundbasedmonitoringanddiaphragmpositioninconebeamcomputedtomographyduringabdominalstereotacticradiotherapyinbreathhold
AT ecklmiriam surfaceguidancecomparedwithultrasoundbasedmonitoringanddiaphragmpositioninconebeamcomputedtomographyduringabdominalstereotacticradiotherapyinbreathhold
AT giordanofranka surfaceguidancecomparedwithultrasoundbasedmonitoringanddiaphragmpositioninconebeamcomputedtomographyduringabdominalstereotacticradiotherapyinbreathhold
AT lohrfrank surfaceguidancecomparedwithultrasoundbasedmonitoringanddiaphragmpositioninconebeamcomputedtomographyduringabdominalstereotacticradiotherapyinbreathhold
AT stielerflorian surfaceguidancecomparedwithultrasoundbasedmonitoringanddiaphragmpositioninconebeamcomputedtomographyduringabdominalstereotacticradiotherapyinbreathhold
AT bodaheggemannjudit surfaceguidancecomparedwithultrasoundbasedmonitoringanddiaphragmpositioninconebeamcomputedtomographyduringabdominalstereotacticradiotherapyinbreathhold