Cargando…

Australian medical radiation practitioners perspectives of continuing professional development: An online cross‐sectional study

INTRODUCTION: Continuing professional development (CPD) is mandatory for registered Australian medical radiation practitioners (MRPs) to maintain competence in their respective scopes of practice. The aim of this study was to explore MRPs attitudes, opinions and satisfaction towards CPD activities o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morgan, Tanya, Ku, Min, Berg, Melissa, Halkett, Georgia KB
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10500116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37301987
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.691
_version_ 1785105854814486528
author Morgan, Tanya
Ku, Min
Berg, Melissa
Halkett, Georgia KB
author_facet Morgan, Tanya
Ku, Min
Berg, Melissa
Halkett, Georgia KB
author_sort Morgan, Tanya
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Continuing professional development (CPD) is mandatory for registered Australian medical radiation practitioners (MRPs) to maintain competence in their respective scopes of practice. The aim of this study was to explore MRPs attitudes, opinions and satisfaction towards CPD activities offered by the Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy (ASMIRT). METHODS: An online cross‐sectional survey was emailed to 6398 ASMIRT members and included questions on: demographics, ASMIRT CPD activities, learning mode preferences, barriers and perceptions of CPD outcomes. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and chi‐square tests. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 1018 MRPs. While MRPs were satisfied with face‐to‐face CPD quality (n = 540, 58.1%) and provision (n = 492, 55.3%), they were dissatisfied with the quantity of online CPD activities (n = 577, 65.1%) delivered by ASMIRT. Online learning was the most preferred mode of CPD delivery (n = 749, 74.2%), followed by face‐to‐face (n = 643, 64.0%) and collaborative learning (n = 539, 53.4%). Younger participants (19–35 years) had positive opinions regarding ASMIRT CPD activities and outcomes. Access to professional development leave (PDL) supported achievement of mandatory CPD requirements (P < 0.001). Lack of time, lack of access and workload were the highest ranked barriers preventing CPD participation. Rural/remote MRPs were dissatisfied with availability (P = 0.023), access (P < 0.001) and adequacy of ASMIRT provided CPD (P < 0.01) and were more likely to encounter barriers to CPD participation (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Many MRPs experienced barriers which prevented them from participating in CPD. Provision of more online CPD activities by ASMIRT and access to PDL can assist. Future improvements will ensure MRPs remain motivated to engage in CPD to improve clinical skills, patient safety and health outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10500116
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105001162023-09-15 Australian medical radiation practitioners perspectives of continuing professional development: An online cross‐sectional study Morgan, Tanya Ku, Min Berg, Melissa Halkett, Georgia KB J Med Radiat Sci Original Articles INTRODUCTION: Continuing professional development (CPD) is mandatory for registered Australian medical radiation practitioners (MRPs) to maintain competence in their respective scopes of practice. The aim of this study was to explore MRPs attitudes, opinions and satisfaction towards CPD activities offered by the Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy (ASMIRT). METHODS: An online cross‐sectional survey was emailed to 6398 ASMIRT members and included questions on: demographics, ASMIRT CPD activities, learning mode preferences, barriers and perceptions of CPD outcomes. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and chi‐square tests. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 1018 MRPs. While MRPs were satisfied with face‐to‐face CPD quality (n = 540, 58.1%) and provision (n = 492, 55.3%), they were dissatisfied with the quantity of online CPD activities (n = 577, 65.1%) delivered by ASMIRT. Online learning was the most preferred mode of CPD delivery (n = 749, 74.2%), followed by face‐to‐face (n = 643, 64.0%) and collaborative learning (n = 539, 53.4%). Younger participants (19–35 years) had positive opinions regarding ASMIRT CPD activities and outcomes. Access to professional development leave (PDL) supported achievement of mandatory CPD requirements (P < 0.001). Lack of time, lack of access and workload were the highest ranked barriers preventing CPD participation. Rural/remote MRPs were dissatisfied with availability (P = 0.023), access (P < 0.001) and adequacy of ASMIRT provided CPD (P < 0.01) and were more likely to encounter barriers to CPD participation (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Many MRPs experienced barriers which prevented them from participating in CPD. Provision of more online CPD activities by ASMIRT and access to PDL can assist. Future improvements will ensure MRPs remain motivated to engage in CPD to improve clinical skills, patient safety and health outcomes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-06-10 2023-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10500116/ /pubmed/37301987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.691 Text en © 2023 Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy and The Authors. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Morgan, Tanya
Ku, Min
Berg, Melissa
Halkett, Georgia KB
Australian medical radiation practitioners perspectives of continuing professional development: An online cross‐sectional study
title Australian medical radiation practitioners perspectives of continuing professional development: An online cross‐sectional study
title_full Australian medical radiation practitioners perspectives of continuing professional development: An online cross‐sectional study
title_fullStr Australian medical radiation practitioners perspectives of continuing professional development: An online cross‐sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Australian medical radiation practitioners perspectives of continuing professional development: An online cross‐sectional study
title_short Australian medical radiation practitioners perspectives of continuing professional development: An online cross‐sectional study
title_sort australian medical radiation practitioners perspectives of continuing professional development: an online cross‐sectional study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10500116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37301987
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.691
work_keys_str_mv AT morgantanya australianmedicalradiationpractitionersperspectivesofcontinuingprofessionaldevelopmentanonlinecrosssectionalstudy
AT kumin australianmedicalradiationpractitionersperspectivesofcontinuingprofessionaldevelopmentanonlinecrosssectionalstudy
AT bergmelissa australianmedicalradiationpractitionersperspectivesofcontinuingprofessionaldevelopmentanonlinecrosssectionalstudy
AT halkettgeorgiakb australianmedicalradiationpractitionersperspectivesofcontinuingprofessionaldevelopmentanonlinecrosssectionalstudy