Cargando…

High-sensitivity Gd(3+)–Gd(3+) EPR distance measurements that eliminate artefacts seen at short distances

Gadolinium complexes are attracting increasing attention as spin labels for EPR dipolar distance measurements in biomolecules and particularly for in-cell measurements. It has been shown that flip-flop transitions within the central transition of the high-spin Gd [Formula: see text] ion can introduc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: EL Mkami, Hassane, Hunter, Robert I., Cruickshank, Paul A. S., Taylor, Michael J., Lovett, Janet E., Feintuch, Akiva, Qi, Mian, Godt, Adelheid, Smith, Graham M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Copernicus GmbH 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10500690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37904818
http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/mr-1-301-2020
_version_ 1785105963123998720
author EL Mkami, Hassane
Hunter, Robert I.
Cruickshank, Paul A. S.
Taylor, Michael J.
Lovett, Janet E.
Feintuch, Akiva
Qi, Mian
Godt, Adelheid
Smith, Graham M.
author_facet EL Mkami, Hassane
Hunter, Robert I.
Cruickshank, Paul A. S.
Taylor, Michael J.
Lovett, Janet E.
Feintuch, Akiva
Qi, Mian
Godt, Adelheid
Smith, Graham M.
author_sort EL Mkami, Hassane
collection PubMed
description Gadolinium complexes are attracting increasing attention as spin labels for EPR dipolar distance measurements in biomolecules and particularly for in-cell measurements. It has been shown that flip-flop transitions within the central transition of the high-spin Gd [Formula: see text] ion can introduce artefacts in dipolar distance measurements, particularly when measuring distances less than 3 nm. Previous work has shown some reduction of these artefacts through increasing the frequency separation between the two frequencies required for the double electron–electron resonance (DEER) experiment. Here we use a high-power (1 kW), wideband, non-resonant system operating at 94 GHz to evaluate DEER measurement protocols using two stiff Gd(III) rulers, consisting of two [Formula: see text] -Gd [Formula: see text] –PyMTA complexes, with separations of 2.1 nm and 6.0 nm, respectively. We show that by avoiding the  [Formula: see text]  central transition completely, and placing both the pump and the observer pulses on either side of the central transition, we can now observe apparently artefact-free spectra and narrow distance distributions, even for a Gd–Gd distance of 2.1 nm. Importantly we still maintain excellent signal-to-noise ratio and relatively high modulation depths. These results have implications for in-cell EPR measurements at naturally occurring biomolecule concentrations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10500690
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Copernicus GmbH
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105006902023-10-30 High-sensitivity Gd(3+)–Gd(3+) EPR distance measurements that eliminate artefacts seen at short distances EL Mkami, Hassane Hunter, Robert I. Cruickshank, Paul A. S. Taylor, Michael J. Lovett, Janet E. Feintuch, Akiva Qi, Mian Godt, Adelheid Smith, Graham M. Magn Reson (Gott) Research Article Gadolinium complexes are attracting increasing attention as spin labels for EPR dipolar distance measurements in biomolecules and particularly for in-cell measurements. It has been shown that flip-flop transitions within the central transition of the high-spin Gd [Formula: see text] ion can introduce artefacts in dipolar distance measurements, particularly when measuring distances less than 3 nm. Previous work has shown some reduction of these artefacts through increasing the frequency separation between the two frequencies required for the double electron–electron resonance (DEER) experiment. Here we use a high-power (1 kW), wideband, non-resonant system operating at 94 GHz to evaluate DEER measurement protocols using two stiff Gd(III) rulers, consisting of two [Formula: see text] -Gd [Formula: see text] –PyMTA complexes, with separations of 2.1 nm and 6.0 nm, respectively. We show that by avoiding the  [Formula: see text]  central transition completely, and placing both the pump and the observer pulses on either side of the central transition, we can now observe apparently artefact-free spectra and narrow distance distributions, even for a Gd–Gd distance of 2.1 nm. Importantly we still maintain excellent signal-to-noise ratio and relatively high modulation depths. These results have implications for in-cell EPR measurements at naturally occurring biomolecule concentrations. Copernicus GmbH 2020-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10500690/ /pubmed/37904818 http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/mr-1-301-2020 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Hassane EL Mkami et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Research Article
EL Mkami, Hassane
Hunter, Robert I.
Cruickshank, Paul A. S.
Taylor, Michael J.
Lovett, Janet E.
Feintuch, Akiva
Qi, Mian
Godt, Adelheid
Smith, Graham M.
High-sensitivity Gd(3+)–Gd(3+) EPR distance measurements that eliminate artefacts seen at short distances
title High-sensitivity Gd(3+)–Gd(3+) EPR distance measurements that eliminate artefacts seen at short distances
title_full High-sensitivity Gd(3+)–Gd(3+) EPR distance measurements that eliminate artefacts seen at short distances
title_fullStr High-sensitivity Gd(3+)–Gd(3+) EPR distance measurements that eliminate artefacts seen at short distances
title_full_unstemmed High-sensitivity Gd(3+)–Gd(3+) EPR distance measurements that eliminate artefacts seen at short distances
title_short High-sensitivity Gd(3+)–Gd(3+) EPR distance measurements that eliminate artefacts seen at short distances
title_sort high-sensitivity gd(3+)–gd(3+) epr distance measurements that eliminate artefacts seen at short distances
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10500690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37904818
http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/mr-1-301-2020
work_keys_str_mv AT elmkamihassane highsensitivitygd3gd3eprdistancemeasurementsthateliminateartefactsseenatshortdistances
AT hunterroberti highsensitivitygd3gd3eprdistancemeasurementsthateliminateartefactsseenatshortdistances
AT cruickshankpaulas highsensitivitygd3gd3eprdistancemeasurementsthateliminateartefactsseenatshortdistances
AT taylormichaelj highsensitivitygd3gd3eprdistancemeasurementsthateliminateartefactsseenatshortdistances
AT lovettjanete highsensitivitygd3gd3eprdistancemeasurementsthateliminateartefactsseenatshortdistances
AT feintuchakiva highsensitivitygd3gd3eprdistancemeasurementsthateliminateartefactsseenatshortdistances
AT qimian highsensitivitygd3gd3eprdistancemeasurementsthateliminateartefactsseenatshortdistances
AT godtadelheid highsensitivitygd3gd3eprdistancemeasurementsthateliminateartefactsseenatshortdistances
AT smithgrahamm highsensitivitygd3gd3eprdistancemeasurementsthateliminateartefactsseenatshortdistances