Cargando…

Why different sugarcane cultivars show different resistant abilities to smut?: Comparisons of endophytic microbial compositions and metabolic functions in stems of sugarcane cultivars with different abilities to resist smut

To elucidate the mechanisms underlying the resistance to smut of different sugarcane cultivars, endophytic bacterial and fungal compositions, functions and metabolites in the stems of the sugarcane cultivars were analyzed using high-throughput sequencing techniques and nontargeted metabolomics. The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Siyu, Chen, Zhongliang, Lin, Xinru, Zhou, Xinyan, Yang, Shangdong, Tan, Hongwei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10500793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37710150
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-023-04446-x
_version_ 1785105987245441024
author Chen, Siyu
Chen, Zhongliang
Lin, Xinru
Zhou, Xinyan
Yang, Shangdong
Tan, Hongwei
author_facet Chen, Siyu
Chen, Zhongliang
Lin, Xinru
Zhou, Xinyan
Yang, Shangdong
Tan, Hongwei
author_sort Chen, Siyu
collection PubMed
description To elucidate the mechanisms underlying the resistance to smut of different sugarcane cultivars, endophytic bacterial and fungal compositions, functions and metabolites in the stems of the sugarcane cultivars were analyzed using high-throughput sequencing techniques and nontargeted metabolomics. The results showed that the levels of ethylene, salicylic acid and jasmonic acid in sugarcane varieties that were not sensitive to smut were all higher than those in sensitive sugarcane varieties. Moreover, endophytic fungi, such as Ramichloridium, Alternaria, Sarocladium, Epicoccum, and Exophiala species, could be considered antagonistic to sugarcane smut. Additionally, the highly active arginine and proline metabolism, pentose phosphate pathway, phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, and tyrosine metabolism in sugarcane varieties that were not sensitive to smut indicated that these pathways contribute to resistance to smut. All of the above results suggested that the relatively highly abundant antagonistic microbes and highly active metabolic functions of endophytes in non-smut-sensitive sugarcane cultivars were important for their relatively high resistance to smut.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10500793
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105007932023-09-15 Why different sugarcane cultivars show different resistant abilities to smut?: Comparisons of endophytic microbial compositions and metabolic functions in stems of sugarcane cultivars with different abilities to resist smut Chen, Siyu Chen, Zhongliang Lin, Xinru Zhou, Xinyan Yang, Shangdong Tan, Hongwei BMC Plant Biol Research To elucidate the mechanisms underlying the resistance to smut of different sugarcane cultivars, endophytic bacterial and fungal compositions, functions and metabolites in the stems of the sugarcane cultivars were analyzed using high-throughput sequencing techniques and nontargeted metabolomics. The results showed that the levels of ethylene, salicylic acid and jasmonic acid in sugarcane varieties that were not sensitive to smut were all higher than those in sensitive sugarcane varieties. Moreover, endophytic fungi, such as Ramichloridium, Alternaria, Sarocladium, Epicoccum, and Exophiala species, could be considered antagonistic to sugarcane smut. Additionally, the highly active arginine and proline metabolism, pentose phosphate pathway, phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, and tyrosine metabolism in sugarcane varieties that were not sensitive to smut indicated that these pathways contribute to resistance to smut. All of the above results suggested that the relatively highly abundant antagonistic microbes and highly active metabolic functions of endophytes in non-smut-sensitive sugarcane cultivars were important for their relatively high resistance to smut. BioMed Central 2023-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10500793/ /pubmed/37710150 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-023-04446-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Chen, Siyu
Chen, Zhongliang
Lin, Xinru
Zhou, Xinyan
Yang, Shangdong
Tan, Hongwei
Why different sugarcane cultivars show different resistant abilities to smut?: Comparisons of endophytic microbial compositions and metabolic functions in stems of sugarcane cultivars with different abilities to resist smut
title Why different sugarcane cultivars show different resistant abilities to smut?: Comparisons of endophytic microbial compositions and metabolic functions in stems of sugarcane cultivars with different abilities to resist smut
title_full Why different sugarcane cultivars show different resistant abilities to smut?: Comparisons of endophytic microbial compositions and metabolic functions in stems of sugarcane cultivars with different abilities to resist smut
title_fullStr Why different sugarcane cultivars show different resistant abilities to smut?: Comparisons of endophytic microbial compositions and metabolic functions in stems of sugarcane cultivars with different abilities to resist smut
title_full_unstemmed Why different sugarcane cultivars show different resistant abilities to smut?: Comparisons of endophytic microbial compositions and metabolic functions in stems of sugarcane cultivars with different abilities to resist smut
title_short Why different sugarcane cultivars show different resistant abilities to smut?: Comparisons of endophytic microbial compositions and metabolic functions in stems of sugarcane cultivars with different abilities to resist smut
title_sort why different sugarcane cultivars show different resistant abilities to smut?: comparisons of endophytic microbial compositions and metabolic functions in stems of sugarcane cultivars with different abilities to resist smut
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10500793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37710150
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-023-04446-x
work_keys_str_mv AT chensiyu whydifferentsugarcanecultivarsshowdifferentresistantabilitiestosmutcomparisonsofendophyticmicrobialcompositionsandmetabolicfunctionsinstemsofsugarcanecultivarswithdifferentabilitiestoresistsmut
AT chenzhongliang whydifferentsugarcanecultivarsshowdifferentresistantabilitiestosmutcomparisonsofendophyticmicrobialcompositionsandmetabolicfunctionsinstemsofsugarcanecultivarswithdifferentabilitiestoresistsmut
AT linxinru whydifferentsugarcanecultivarsshowdifferentresistantabilitiestosmutcomparisonsofendophyticmicrobialcompositionsandmetabolicfunctionsinstemsofsugarcanecultivarswithdifferentabilitiestoresistsmut
AT zhouxinyan whydifferentsugarcanecultivarsshowdifferentresistantabilitiestosmutcomparisonsofendophyticmicrobialcompositionsandmetabolicfunctionsinstemsofsugarcanecultivarswithdifferentabilitiestoresistsmut
AT yangshangdong whydifferentsugarcanecultivarsshowdifferentresistantabilitiestosmutcomparisonsofendophyticmicrobialcompositionsandmetabolicfunctionsinstemsofsugarcanecultivarswithdifferentabilitiestoresistsmut
AT tanhongwei whydifferentsugarcanecultivarsshowdifferentresistantabilitiestosmutcomparisonsofendophyticmicrobialcompositionsandmetabolicfunctionsinstemsofsugarcanecultivarswithdifferentabilitiestoresistsmut