Cargando…
Increasing the efficiency of study selection for systematic reviews using prioritization tools and a single-screening approach
BACKGROUND: Systematic literature screening is a key component in systematic reviews. However, this approach is resource intensive as generally two persons independently of each other (double screening) screen a vast number of search results. To develop approaches for increasing efficiency, we teste...
Autores principales: | Waffenschmidt, Siw, Sieben, Wiebke, Jakubeit, Thomas, Knelangen, Marco, Overesch, Inga, Bühn, Stefanie, Pieper, Dawid, Skoetz, Nicole, Hausner, Elke |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10500815/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37705060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02334-x |
Ejemplares similares
-
Single screening versus conventional double screening for study selection in systematic reviews: a methodological systematic review
por: Waffenschmidt, Siw, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Effective study selection using text mining or a single-screening approach: a study protocol
por: Waffenschmidt, Siw, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Routine development of objectively derived search strategies
por: Hausner, Elke, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Study filters for non-randomized studies of interventions consistently lacked sensitivity upon external validation
por: Hausner, Elke, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Are patients willing to accept longer travel times to decrease their risk associated with surgical procedures? A systematic review
por: Bühn, Stefanie, et al.
Publicado: (2020)