Cargando…
Incidence and prevalence of neurofibromatosis type 1 and 2: a systematic review and meta-analysis
OBJECTIVE: To obtain updated estimates of the incidence and prevalence of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and type 2 (NF2). STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a systematic search of NF1 and NF2 incidence or prevalence studies, in OVID Medline, OVID Embase, Web of Science, and Cinahl. Studies were appraised w...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10500831/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37710322 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-023-02911-2 |
_version_ | 1785105996683673600 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Tin-Suet Joan Chopra, Meera Kim, Raymond H Parkin, Patricia C. Barnett-Tapia, Carolina |
author_facet | Lee, Tin-Suet Joan Chopra, Meera Kim, Raymond H Parkin, Patricia C. Barnett-Tapia, Carolina |
author_sort | Lee, Tin-Suet Joan |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To obtain updated estimates of the incidence and prevalence of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and type 2 (NF2). STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a systematic search of NF1 and NF2 incidence or prevalence studies, in OVID Medline, OVID Embase, Web of Science, and Cinahl. Studies were appraised with the Joanna Briggs Institute Prevalence Critical Appraisal tool. Pooled incidence and prevalence rates were estimated through random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: From 1,939 abstracts, 20 studies were fully appraised and 12 were included in the final review. Pooled NF1 prevalence was 1 in 3,164 (95%CI: 1 in 2,132-1 in 4,712). This was higher in studies that screened for NF1, compared to identification of NF1 through medical records (1 in 2,020 and 1 in 4,329, respectively). NF1 pooled birth incidence was 1 in 2,662 (95%CI: 1 in 1,968-1 in 3,601). There were only 2 studies on NF2 prevalence, so data were not pooled. Pooled NF2 birth incidence was 1.08 per 50,000 births (95%CI: 1 in 32,829-1 in 65,019). CONCLUSION: We present updated estimates of the incidence and prevalence of NF1 and NF2, to help plan for healthcare access and allocation. The prevalence of NF1 from screening studies is higher than from medical record studies, suggesting that the disease may be under recognized. More studies are needed regarding the prevalence of NF2. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13023-023-02911-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10500831 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105008312023-09-15 Incidence and prevalence of neurofibromatosis type 1 and 2: a systematic review and meta-analysis Lee, Tin-Suet Joan Chopra, Meera Kim, Raymond H Parkin, Patricia C. Barnett-Tapia, Carolina Orphanet J Rare Dis Research OBJECTIVE: To obtain updated estimates of the incidence and prevalence of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and type 2 (NF2). STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a systematic search of NF1 and NF2 incidence or prevalence studies, in OVID Medline, OVID Embase, Web of Science, and Cinahl. Studies were appraised with the Joanna Briggs Institute Prevalence Critical Appraisal tool. Pooled incidence and prevalence rates were estimated through random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: From 1,939 abstracts, 20 studies were fully appraised and 12 were included in the final review. Pooled NF1 prevalence was 1 in 3,164 (95%CI: 1 in 2,132-1 in 4,712). This was higher in studies that screened for NF1, compared to identification of NF1 through medical records (1 in 2,020 and 1 in 4,329, respectively). NF1 pooled birth incidence was 1 in 2,662 (95%CI: 1 in 1,968-1 in 3,601). There were only 2 studies on NF2 prevalence, so data were not pooled. Pooled NF2 birth incidence was 1.08 per 50,000 births (95%CI: 1 in 32,829-1 in 65,019). CONCLUSION: We present updated estimates of the incidence and prevalence of NF1 and NF2, to help plan for healthcare access and allocation. The prevalence of NF1 from screening studies is higher than from medical record studies, suggesting that the disease may be under recognized. More studies are needed regarding the prevalence of NF2. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13023-023-02911-2. BioMed Central 2023-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10500831/ /pubmed/37710322 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-023-02911-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Lee, Tin-Suet Joan Chopra, Meera Kim, Raymond H Parkin, Patricia C. Barnett-Tapia, Carolina Incidence and prevalence of neurofibromatosis type 1 and 2: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Incidence and prevalence of neurofibromatosis type 1 and 2: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Incidence and prevalence of neurofibromatosis type 1 and 2: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Incidence and prevalence of neurofibromatosis type 1 and 2: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Incidence and prevalence of neurofibromatosis type 1 and 2: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Incidence and prevalence of neurofibromatosis type 1 and 2: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | incidence and prevalence of neurofibromatosis type 1 and 2: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10500831/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37710322 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-023-02911-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leetinsuetjoan incidenceandprevalenceofneurofibromatosistype1and2asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT choprameera incidenceandprevalenceofneurofibromatosistype1and2asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kimraymondh incidenceandprevalenceofneurofibromatosistype1and2asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT parkinpatriciac incidenceandprevalenceofneurofibromatosistype1and2asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT barnetttapiacarolina incidenceandprevalenceofneurofibromatosistype1and2asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |