Cargando…
EMG feedback improves grasping of compliant objects using a myoelectric prosthesis
BACKGROUND: Closing the control loop in myoelectric prostheses by providing artificial somatosensory feedback is recognized as an important goal. However, designing a feedback interface that is effective in realistic conditions is still a challenge. Namely, in some situations, feedback can be redund...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10500847/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37705008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-023-01237-1 |
_version_ | 1785106000574939136 |
---|---|
author | Tchimino, Jack Dideriksen, Jakob Lund Dosen, Strahinja |
author_facet | Tchimino, Jack Dideriksen, Jakob Lund Dosen, Strahinja |
author_sort | Tchimino, Jack |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Closing the control loop in myoelectric prostheses by providing artificial somatosensory feedback is recognized as an important goal. However, designing a feedback interface that is effective in realistic conditions is still a challenge. Namely, in some situations, feedback can be redundant, as the information it provides can be readily obtained through hearing or vision (e.g., grasping force estimated from the deformation of a compliant object). EMG feedback is a non-invasive method wherein the tactile stimulation conveys to the user the level of their own myoelectric signal, hence a measurement intrinsic to the interface, which cannot be accessed incidentally. METHODS: The present study investigated the efficacy of EMG feedback in prosthesis force control when 10 able-bodied participants and a person with transradial amputation used a myoelectric prosthesis to grasp compliant objects of different stiffness values. The performance with feedback was compared to that achieved when the participants relied solely on incidental cues. RESULTS: The main outcome measures were the task success rate and completion time. EMG feedback resulted in significantly higher success rates regardless of pin stiffness, indicating that the feedback enhanced the accuracy of force application despite the abundance of incidental cues. Contrary to expectations, there was no difference in the completion time between the two feedback conditions. Additionally, the data revealed that the participants could produce smoother control signals when they received EMG feedback as well as more consistent commands across trials, signifying better control of the system by the participants. CONCLUSIONS: The results presented in this study further support the efficacy of EMG feedback when closing the prosthesis control loop by demonstrating its benefits in particularly challenging conditions which maximized the utility of intrinsic feedback sources. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10500847 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105008472023-09-15 EMG feedback improves grasping of compliant objects using a myoelectric prosthesis Tchimino, Jack Dideriksen, Jakob Lund Dosen, Strahinja J Neuroeng Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: Closing the control loop in myoelectric prostheses by providing artificial somatosensory feedback is recognized as an important goal. However, designing a feedback interface that is effective in realistic conditions is still a challenge. Namely, in some situations, feedback can be redundant, as the information it provides can be readily obtained through hearing or vision (e.g., grasping force estimated from the deformation of a compliant object). EMG feedback is a non-invasive method wherein the tactile stimulation conveys to the user the level of their own myoelectric signal, hence a measurement intrinsic to the interface, which cannot be accessed incidentally. METHODS: The present study investigated the efficacy of EMG feedback in prosthesis force control when 10 able-bodied participants and a person with transradial amputation used a myoelectric prosthesis to grasp compliant objects of different stiffness values. The performance with feedback was compared to that achieved when the participants relied solely on incidental cues. RESULTS: The main outcome measures were the task success rate and completion time. EMG feedback resulted in significantly higher success rates regardless of pin stiffness, indicating that the feedback enhanced the accuracy of force application despite the abundance of incidental cues. Contrary to expectations, there was no difference in the completion time between the two feedback conditions. Additionally, the data revealed that the participants could produce smoother control signals when they received EMG feedback as well as more consistent commands across trials, signifying better control of the system by the participants. CONCLUSIONS: The results presented in this study further support the efficacy of EMG feedback when closing the prosthesis control loop by demonstrating its benefits in particularly challenging conditions which maximized the utility of intrinsic feedback sources. BioMed Central 2023-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10500847/ /pubmed/37705008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-023-01237-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Tchimino, Jack Dideriksen, Jakob Lund Dosen, Strahinja EMG feedback improves grasping of compliant objects using a myoelectric prosthesis |
title | EMG feedback improves grasping of compliant objects using a myoelectric prosthesis |
title_full | EMG feedback improves grasping of compliant objects using a myoelectric prosthesis |
title_fullStr | EMG feedback improves grasping of compliant objects using a myoelectric prosthesis |
title_full_unstemmed | EMG feedback improves grasping of compliant objects using a myoelectric prosthesis |
title_short | EMG feedback improves grasping of compliant objects using a myoelectric prosthesis |
title_sort | emg feedback improves grasping of compliant objects using a myoelectric prosthesis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10500847/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37705008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-023-01237-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tchiminojack emgfeedbackimprovesgraspingofcompliantobjectsusingamyoelectricprosthesis AT dideriksenjakoblund emgfeedbackimprovesgraspingofcompliantobjectsusingamyoelectricprosthesis AT dosenstrahinja emgfeedbackimprovesgraspingofcompliantobjectsusingamyoelectricprosthesis |