Cargando…

Analysis of polygenic selection in purebred and crossbred pig genomes using generation proxy selection mapping

BACKGROUND: Artificial selection on quantitative traits using breeding values and selection indices in commercial livestock breeding populations causes changes in allele frequency over time at hundreds or thousands of causal loci and the surrounding genomic regions. In population genetics, this type...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grohmann, Caleb J., Shull, Caleb M., Crum, Tamar E., Schwab, Clint, Safranski, Timothy J., Decker, Jared E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10500877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37710159
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-023-00836-9
_version_ 1785106007601446912
author Grohmann, Caleb J.
Shull, Caleb M.
Crum, Tamar E.
Schwab, Clint
Safranski, Timothy J.
Decker, Jared E.
author_facet Grohmann, Caleb J.
Shull, Caleb M.
Crum, Tamar E.
Schwab, Clint
Safranski, Timothy J.
Decker, Jared E.
author_sort Grohmann, Caleb J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Artificial selection on quantitative traits using breeding values and selection indices in commercial livestock breeding populations causes changes in allele frequency over time at hundreds or thousands of causal loci and the surrounding genomic regions. In population genetics, this type of selection is called polygenic selection. Researchers and managers of pig breeding programs are motivated to understand the genetic basis of phenotypic diversity across genetic lines, breeds, and populations using selection mapping analyses. Here, we applied generation proxy selection mapping (GPSM), a genome-wide association analysis of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotypes (38,294–46,458 markers) of birth date, in four pig populations (15,457, 15,772, 16,595 and 8447 pigs per population) to identify loci responding to artificial selection over a period of five to ten years. Gene-drop simulation analyses were conducted to provide context for the GPSM results. Selected loci within and across each population of pigs were compared in the context of swine breeding objectives. RESULTS: The GPSM identified 49 to 854 loci as under selection (Q-values less than 0.10) across 15 subsets of pigs based on combinations of populations. The number of significant associations increased when data were pooled across populations. In addition, several significant associations were identified in more than one population. These results indicate concurrent selection objectives, similar genetic architectures, and shared causal variants responding to selection across these pig populations. Negligible error rates (less than or equal to 0.02%) of false-positive associations were found when testing GPSM on gene-drop simulated genotypes, suggesting that GPSM distinguishes selection from random genetic drift in actual pig populations. CONCLUSIONS: This work confirms the efficacy and the negligible error rates of the GPSM method in detecting selected loci in commercial pig populations. Our results suggest shared selection objectives and genetic architectures across swine populations. The identified polygenic selection highlights loci that are important to swine production. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12711-023-00836-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10500877
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105008772023-09-15 Analysis of polygenic selection in purebred and crossbred pig genomes using generation proxy selection mapping Grohmann, Caleb J. Shull, Caleb M. Crum, Tamar E. Schwab, Clint Safranski, Timothy J. Decker, Jared E. Genet Sel Evol Research Article BACKGROUND: Artificial selection on quantitative traits using breeding values and selection indices in commercial livestock breeding populations causes changes in allele frequency over time at hundreds or thousands of causal loci and the surrounding genomic regions. In population genetics, this type of selection is called polygenic selection. Researchers and managers of pig breeding programs are motivated to understand the genetic basis of phenotypic diversity across genetic lines, breeds, and populations using selection mapping analyses. Here, we applied generation proxy selection mapping (GPSM), a genome-wide association analysis of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotypes (38,294–46,458 markers) of birth date, in four pig populations (15,457, 15,772, 16,595 and 8447 pigs per population) to identify loci responding to artificial selection over a period of five to ten years. Gene-drop simulation analyses were conducted to provide context for the GPSM results. Selected loci within and across each population of pigs were compared in the context of swine breeding objectives. RESULTS: The GPSM identified 49 to 854 loci as under selection (Q-values less than 0.10) across 15 subsets of pigs based on combinations of populations. The number of significant associations increased when data were pooled across populations. In addition, several significant associations were identified in more than one population. These results indicate concurrent selection objectives, similar genetic architectures, and shared causal variants responding to selection across these pig populations. Negligible error rates (less than or equal to 0.02%) of false-positive associations were found when testing GPSM on gene-drop simulated genotypes, suggesting that GPSM distinguishes selection from random genetic drift in actual pig populations. CONCLUSIONS: This work confirms the efficacy and the negligible error rates of the GPSM method in detecting selected loci in commercial pig populations. Our results suggest shared selection objectives and genetic architectures across swine populations. The identified polygenic selection highlights loci that are important to swine production. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12711-023-00836-9. BioMed Central 2023-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10500877/ /pubmed/37710159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-023-00836-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Grohmann, Caleb J.
Shull, Caleb M.
Crum, Tamar E.
Schwab, Clint
Safranski, Timothy J.
Decker, Jared E.
Analysis of polygenic selection in purebred and crossbred pig genomes using generation proxy selection mapping
title Analysis of polygenic selection in purebred and crossbred pig genomes using generation proxy selection mapping
title_full Analysis of polygenic selection in purebred and crossbred pig genomes using generation proxy selection mapping
title_fullStr Analysis of polygenic selection in purebred and crossbred pig genomes using generation proxy selection mapping
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of polygenic selection in purebred and crossbred pig genomes using generation proxy selection mapping
title_short Analysis of polygenic selection in purebred and crossbred pig genomes using generation proxy selection mapping
title_sort analysis of polygenic selection in purebred and crossbred pig genomes using generation proxy selection mapping
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10500877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37710159
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-023-00836-9
work_keys_str_mv AT grohmanncalebj analysisofpolygenicselectioninpurebredandcrossbredpiggenomesusinggenerationproxyselectionmapping
AT shullcalebm analysisofpolygenicselectioninpurebredandcrossbredpiggenomesusinggenerationproxyselectionmapping
AT crumtamare analysisofpolygenicselectioninpurebredandcrossbredpiggenomesusinggenerationproxyselectionmapping
AT schwabclint analysisofpolygenicselectioninpurebredandcrossbredpiggenomesusinggenerationproxyselectionmapping
AT safranskitimothyj analysisofpolygenicselectioninpurebredandcrossbredpiggenomesusinggenerationproxyselectionmapping
AT deckerjarede analysisofpolygenicselectioninpurebredandcrossbredpiggenomesusinggenerationproxyselectionmapping