Cargando…

Impact of gallstone disease on the risk of stroke and coronary artery disease: evidence from prospective observational studies and genetic analyses

BACKGROUND: Despite epidemiological evidence associating gallstone disease (GSD) with cardiovascular disease (CVD), a dilemma remains on the role of cholecystectomy in modifying the risk of CVD. We aimed to characterize the phenotypic and genetic relationships between GSD and two CVD events – stroke...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Li, Zhang, Wenqiang, He, Lin, Cui, Huijie, Wang, Yutong, Wu, Xueyao, Zhao, Xunying, Yan, Peijing, Yang, Chao, Xiao, Changfeng, Tang, Mingshuang, Chen, Lin, Xiao, Chenghan, Zou, Yanqiu, Liu, Yunjie, Yang, Yanfang, Zhang, Ling, Yao, Yuqin, Li, Jiayuan, Liu, Zhenmi, Yang, Chunxia, Jiang, Xia, Zhang, Ben
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10500913/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37705021
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-023-03072-6
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Despite epidemiological evidence associating gallstone disease (GSD) with cardiovascular disease (CVD), a dilemma remains on the role of cholecystectomy in modifying the risk of CVD. We aimed to characterize the phenotypic and genetic relationships between GSD and two CVD events – stroke and coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: We first performed a meta-analysis of cohort studies to quantify an overall phenotypic association between GSD and CVD. We then investigated the genetic relationship leveraging the largest genome-wide genetic summary statistics. We finally examined the phenotypic association using the comprehensive data from UK Biobank (UKB). RESULTS: An overall significant effect of GSD on CVD was found in meta-analysis (relative risk [RR] = 1.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.19–1.34). Genetically, a positive shared genetic basis was observed for GSD with stroke ([Formula: see text] =0.16, P = 6.00 × 10(–4)) and CAD ([Formula: see text] =0.27, P = 2.27 × 10(–15)), corroborated by local signals. The shared genetic architecture was largely explained by the multiple pleiotropic loci identified in cross-phenotype association study and the shared gene-tissue pairs detected by transcriptome-wide association study, but not a causal relationship (GSD to CVD) examined through Mendelian randomization (MR) (GSD-stroke: odds ratio [OR] = 1.00, 95%CI = 0.97–1.03; GSD-CAD: OR = 1.01, 95%CI = 0.98–1.04). After a careful adjustment of confounders or considering lag time using UKB data, no significant phenotypic effect of GSD on CVD was detected (GSD-stroke: hazard ratio [HR] = 0.95, 95%CI = 0.83–1.09; GSD-CAD: HR = 0.98, 95%CI = 0.91–1.06), further supporting MR findings. CONCLUSIONS: Our work demonstrates a phenotypic and genetic relationship between GSD and CVD, highlighting a shared biological mechanism rather than a direct causal effect. These findings may provide insight into clinical and public health applications. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12916-023-03072-6.