Cargando…

Individual differences in late positive potential amplitude and theta power predict cue-induced eating

Cue-induced reward-seeking behaviors are regulated by both the affective and cognitive control systems of the brain. This study aimed at investigating how individual differences in affective and cognitive responses to cues predicting food rewards contribute to the regulation of cue-induced eating. W...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gibney, Kyla D., Kypriotakis, George, Versace, Francesco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10501046/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37711965
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.addicn.2023.100106
_version_ 1785106041372934144
author Gibney, Kyla D.
Kypriotakis, George
Versace, Francesco
author_facet Gibney, Kyla D.
Kypriotakis, George
Versace, Francesco
author_sort Gibney, Kyla D.
collection PubMed
description Cue-induced reward-seeking behaviors are regulated by both the affective and cognitive control systems of the brain. This study aimed at investigating how individual differences in affective and cognitive responses to cues predicting food rewards contribute to the regulation of cue-induced eating. We recorded electroencephalogram (EEG) from 59 adults while they viewed emotional and food-related images that preceded the delivery of food rewards (candies) or non-food objects (beads). We measured the amplitude of the late positive potential (LPP) in response to a variety of motivationally relevant images and power in the theta (4–8 Hz) frequency band after candies or beads were dispensed to the participants. We found that individuals with larger LPP responses to food images than to pleasant images (C>P group) ate significantly more during the experiment than those with the opposite response pattern (P>C group, p < 0.001). Furthermore, we found that individuals with higher theta power after dispensation of the candy than of the bead (θCA>θBE) ate significantly more than those with the opposite response pattern (θBE>θCA, p < 0.001). Finally, we found that the crossed P>C and θBE>θCA group ate less (p < 0.001) than did the other three groups formed by crossing the LPP and theta group assignments, who exhibited similar eating behavior on average (p = 0.662). These findings demonstrate that individual differences in both affective and cognitive responses to reward-related cues underlie vulnerability to cue-induced behaviors, underscoring the need for individualized treatments to mitigate maladaptive behaviors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10501046
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105010462023-09-14 Individual differences in late positive potential amplitude and theta power predict cue-induced eating Gibney, Kyla D. Kypriotakis, George Versace, Francesco Addict Neurosci Article Cue-induced reward-seeking behaviors are regulated by both the affective and cognitive control systems of the brain. This study aimed at investigating how individual differences in affective and cognitive responses to cues predicting food rewards contribute to the regulation of cue-induced eating. We recorded electroencephalogram (EEG) from 59 adults while they viewed emotional and food-related images that preceded the delivery of food rewards (candies) or non-food objects (beads). We measured the amplitude of the late positive potential (LPP) in response to a variety of motivationally relevant images and power in the theta (4–8 Hz) frequency band after candies or beads were dispensed to the participants. We found that individuals with larger LPP responses to food images than to pleasant images (C>P group) ate significantly more during the experiment than those with the opposite response pattern (P>C group, p < 0.001). Furthermore, we found that individuals with higher theta power after dispensation of the candy than of the bead (θCA>θBE) ate significantly more than those with the opposite response pattern (θBE>θCA, p < 0.001). Finally, we found that the crossed P>C and θBE>θCA group ate less (p < 0.001) than did the other three groups formed by crossing the LPP and theta group assignments, who exhibited similar eating behavior on average (p = 0.662). These findings demonstrate that individual differences in both affective and cognitive responses to reward-related cues underlie vulnerability to cue-induced behaviors, underscoring the need for individualized treatments to mitigate maladaptive behaviors. 2023-09 2023-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10501046/ /pubmed/37711965 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.addicn.2023.100106 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Article
Gibney, Kyla D.
Kypriotakis, George
Versace, Francesco
Individual differences in late positive potential amplitude and theta power predict cue-induced eating
title Individual differences in late positive potential amplitude and theta power predict cue-induced eating
title_full Individual differences in late positive potential amplitude and theta power predict cue-induced eating
title_fullStr Individual differences in late positive potential amplitude and theta power predict cue-induced eating
title_full_unstemmed Individual differences in late positive potential amplitude and theta power predict cue-induced eating
title_short Individual differences in late positive potential amplitude and theta power predict cue-induced eating
title_sort individual differences in late positive potential amplitude and theta power predict cue-induced eating
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10501046/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37711965
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.addicn.2023.100106
work_keys_str_mv AT gibneykylad individualdifferencesinlatepositivepotentialamplitudeandthetapowerpredictcueinducedeating
AT kypriotakisgeorge individualdifferencesinlatepositivepotentialamplitudeandthetapowerpredictcueinducedeating
AT versacefrancesco individualdifferencesinlatepositivepotentialamplitudeandthetapowerpredictcueinducedeating