Cargando…
Individual differences in late positive potential amplitude and theta power predict cue-induced eating
Cue-induced reward-seeking behaviors are regulated by both the affective and cognitive control systems of the brain. This study aimed at investigating how individual differences in affective and cognitive responses to cues predicting food rewards contribute to the regulation of cue-induced eating. W...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10501046/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37711965 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.addicn.2023.100106 |
_version_ | 1785106041372934144 |
---|---|
author | Gibney, Kyla D. Kypriotakis, George Versace, Francesco |
author_facet | Gibney, Kyla D. Kypriotakis, George Versace, Francesco |
author_sort | Gibney, Kyla D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cue-induced reward-seeking behaviors are regulated by both the affective and cognitive control systems of the brain. This study aimed at investigating how individual differences in affective and cognitive responses to cues predicting food rewards contribute to the regulation of cue-induced eating. We recorded electroencephalogram (EEG) from 59 adults while they viewed emotional and food-related images that preceded the delivery of food rewards (candies) or non-food objects (beads). We measured the amplitude of the late positive potential (LPP) in response to a variety of motivationally relevant images and power in the theta (4–8 Hz) frequency band after candies or beads were dispensed to the participants. We found that individuals with larger LPP responses to food images than to pleasant images (C>P group) ate significantly more during the experiment than those with the opposite response pattern (P>C group, p < 0.001). Furthermore, we found that individuals with higher theta power after dispensation of the candy than of the bead (θCA>θBE) ate significantly more than those with the opposite response pattern (θBE>θCA, p < 0.001). Finally, we found that the crossed P>C and θBE>θCA group ate less (p < 0.001) than did the other three groups formed by crossing the LPP and theta group assignments, who exhibited similar eating behavior on average (p = 0.662). These findings demonstrate that individual differences in both affective and cognitive responses to reward-related cues underlie vulnerability to cue-induced behaviors, underscoring the need for individualized treatments to mitigate maladaptive behaviors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10501046 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105010462023-09-14 Individual differences in late positive potential amplitude and theta power predict cue-induced eating Gibney, Kyla D. Kypriotakis, George Versace, Francesco Addict Neurosci Article Cue-induced reward-seeking behaviors are regulated by both the affective and cognitive control systems of the brain. This study aimed at investigating how individual differences in affective and cognitive responses to cues predicting food rewards contribute to the regulation of cue-induced eating. We recorded electroencephalogram (EEG) from 59 adults while they viewed emotional and food-related images that preceded the delivery of food rewards (candies) or non-food objects (beads). We measured the amplitude of the late positive potential (LPP) in response to a variety of motivationally relevant images and power in the theta (4–8 Hz) frequency band after candies or beads were dispensed to the participants. We found that individuals with larger LPP responses to food images than to pleasant images (C>P group) ate significantly more during the experiment than those with the opposite response pattern (P>C group, p < 0.001). Furthermore, we found that individuals with higher theta power after dispensation of the candy than of the bead (θCA>θBE) ate significantly more than those with the opposite response pattern (θBE>θCA, p < 0.001). Finally, we found that the crossed P>C and θBE>θCA group ate less (p < 0.001) than did the other three groups formed by crossing the LPP and theta group assignments, who exhibited similar eating behavior on average (p = 0.662). These findings demonstrate that individual differences in both affective and cognitive responses to reward-related cues underlie vulnerability to cue-induced behaviors, underscoring the need for individualized treatments to mitigate maladaptive behaviors. 2023-09 2023-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10501046/ /pubmed/37711965 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.addicn.2023.100106 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ) |
spellingShingle | Article Gibney, Kyla D. Kypriotakis, George Versace, Francesco Individual differences in late positive potential amplitude and theta power predict cue-induced eating |
title | Individual differences in late positive potential amplitude and theta power predict cue-induced eating |
title_full | Individual differences in late positive potential amplitude and theta power predict cue-induced eating |
title_fullStr | Individual differences in late positive potential amplitude and theta power predict cue-induced eating |
title_full_unstemmed | Individual differences in late positive potential amplitude and theta power predict cue-induced eating |
title_short | Individual differences in late positive potential amplitude and theta power predict cue-induced eating |
title_sort | individual differences in late positive potential amplitude and theta power predict cue-induced eating |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10501046/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37711965 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.addicn.2023.100106 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gibneykylad individualdifferencesinlatepositivepotentialamplitudeandthetapowerpredictcueinducedeating AT kypriotakisgeorge individualdifferencesinlatepositivepotentialamplitudeandthetapowerpredictcueinducedeating AT versacefrancesco individualdifferencesinlatepositivepotentialamplitudeandthetapowerpredictcueinducedeating |