Cargando…
Operational Framework to Quantify “Quality of Recycling” across Different Material Types
[Image: see text] Many pledges and laws are setting recycling targets without clearly defining quality of recycling. Striving to close this gap, this study presents an operational framework to quantify quality of recycling. The framework comprises three dimensions: the Virgin Displacement Potential...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2023
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10501198/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37640371 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c03023 |
_version_ | 1785106071058120704 |
---|---|
author | Roosen, Martijn Tonini, Davide Albizzati, Paola Federica Caro, Dario Cristóbal, Jorge Lase, Irdanto Saputra Ragaert, Kim Dumoulin, Ann De Meester, Steven |
author_facet | Roosen, Martijn Tonini, Davide Albizzati, Paola Federica Caro, Dario Cristóbal, Jorge Lase, Irdanto Saputra Ragaert, Kim Dumoulin, Ann De Meester, Steven |
author_sort | Roosen, Martijn |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] Many pledges and laws are setting recycling targets without clearly defining quality of recycling. Striving to close this gap, this study presents an operational framework to quantify quality of recycling. The framework comprises three dimensions: the Virgin Displacement Potential (VDP); In-Use Stocks Lifetime (IUSL); and Environmental Impact (EI). The VDP indicates to what extent a secondary material can be used as a substitute for virgin material; the IUSL indicates how much of a certain material is still functional in society over a given time frame, and the EI is a measure of the environmental impact of a recycling process. The three dimensions are aggregated by plotting them in a distance-to-target graph. Two example calculations are included on poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and glass. The results indicate that the recycling of bottle and container glass collected via a deposit–refund system has the lowest distance-to-target, at 1.05, and, thus, the highest quality of recycling. For PET bottles, the highest quality of recycling is achieved in closed-loop mechanical recycling of bottles (distance to optimal quality of 0.96). Furthermore, sensitivity analysis indicates that certain parameters, e.g., the collection rate for PET bottles, can reduce the distance-to-target to 0.75 when all bottles are collected for recycling. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10501198 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105011982023-09-15 Operational Framework to Quantify “Quality of Recycling” across Different Material Types Roosen, Martijn Tonini, Davide Albizzati, Paola Federica Caro, Dario Cristóbal, Jorge Lase, Irdanto Saputra Ragaert, Kim Dumoulin, Ann De Meester, Steven Environ Sci Technol [Image: see text] Many pledges and laws are setting recycling targets without clearly defining quality of recycling. Striving to close this gap, this study presents an operational framework to quantify quality of recycling. The framework comprises three dimensions: the Virgin Displacement Potential (VDP); In-Use Stocks Lifetime (IUSL); and Environmental Impact (EI). The VDP indicates to what extent a secondary material can be used as a substitute for virgin material; the IUSL indicates how much of a certain material is still functional in society over a given time frame, and the EI is a measure of the environmental impact of a recycling process. The three dimensions are aggregated by plotting them in a distance-to-target graph. Two example calculations are included on poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and glass. The results indicate that the recycling of bottle and container glass collected via a deposit–refund system has the lowest distance-to-target, at 1.05, and, thus, the highest quality of recycling. For PET bottles, the highest quality of recycling is achieved in closed-loop mechanical recycling of bottles (distance to optimal quality of 0.96). Furthermore, sensitivity analysis indicates that certain parameters, e.g., the collection rate for PET bottles, can reduce the distance-to-target to 0.75 when all bottles are collected for recycling. American Chemical Society 2023-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10501198/ /pubmed/37640371 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c03023 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Permits non-commercial access and re-use, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained; but does not permit creation of adaptations or other derivative works (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Roosen, Martijn Tonini, Davide Albizzati, Paola Federica Caro, Dario Cristóbal, Jorge Lase, Irdanto Saputra Ragaert, Kim Dumoulin, Ann De Meester, Steven Operational Framework to Quantify “Quality of Recycling” across Different Material Types |
title | Operational Framework
to Quantify “Quality
of Recycling” across Different Material Types |
title_full | Operational Framework
to Quantify “Quality
of Recycling” across Different Material Types |
title_fullStr | Operational Framework
to Quantify “Quality
of Recycling” across Different Material Types |
title_full_unstemmed | Operational Framework
to Quantify “Quality
of Recycling” across Different Material Types |
title_short | Operational Framework
to Quantify “Quality
of Recycling” across Different Material Types |
title_sort | operational framework
to quantify “quality
of recycling” across different material types |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10501198/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37640371 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c03023 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT roosenmartijn operationalframeworktoquantifyqualityofrecyclingacrossdifferentmaterialtypes AT toninidavide operationalframeworktoquantifyqualityofrecyclingacrossdifferentmaterialtypes AT albizzatipaolafederica operationalframeworktoquantifyqualityofrecyclingacrossdifferentmaterialtypes AT carodario operationalframeworktoquantifyqualityofrecyclingacrossdifferentmaterialtypes AT cristobaljorge operationalframeworktoquantifyqualityofrecyclingacrossdifferentmaterialtypes AT laseirdantosaputra operationalframeworktoquantifyqualityofrecyclingacrossdifferentmaterialtypes AT ragaertkim operationalframeworktoquantifyqualityofrecyclingacrossdifferentmaterialtypes AT dumoulinann operationalframeworktoquantifyqualityofrecyclingacrossdifferentmaterialtypes AT demeestersteven operationalframeworktoquantifyqualityofrecyclingacrossdifferentmaterialtypes |