Cargando…

Misuse of tumor marker levels leads to an insufficient International Germ Cell Consensus Classification (IGCCCG) risk group assignment and impaired treatment

BACKGROUND: Metastatic germ cell tumors of the testis (GCTs) are risk‐stratified according to the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) classification system. This risk classification is based on anatomical risk factors as well as tumor marker levels of AFP, HCG, and LDH assess...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Majewski, Matthäus, Paffenholz, Pia, Ruf, Christian, Che, Yue, Seidel, Christoph, Heinzelbecker, Julia, Schmelz, Hans‐Ulrich, Matthies, Cord, Albers, Peter, Bokemeyer, Carsten, Heidenreich, Axel, Pichler, Martin, Nestler, Tim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10501278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37392170
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6304
_version_ 1785106086884278272
author Majewski, Matthäus
Paffenholz, Pia
Ruf, Christian
Che, Yue
Seidel, Christoph
Heinzelbecker, Julia
Schmelz, Hans‐Ulrich
Matthies, Cord
Albers, Peter
Bokemeyer, Carsten
Heidenreich, Axel
Pichler, Martin
Nestler, Tim
author_facet Majewski, Matthäus
Paffenholz, Pia
Ruf, Christian
Che, Yue
Seidel, Christoph
Heinzelbecker, Julia
Schmelz, Hans‐Ulrich
Matthies, Cord
Albers, Peter
Bokemeyer, Carsten
Heidenreich, Axel
Pichler, Martin
Nestler, Tim
author_sort Majewski, Matthäus
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Metastatic germ cell tumors of the testis (GCTs) are risk‐stratified according to the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) classification system. This risk classification is based on anatomical risk factors as well as tumor marker levels of AFP, HCG, and LDH assessed pre‐chemotherapy after orchiectomy treatment. An incorrect classification is possible when pre‐orchiectomy marker levels are used, possibly resulting in over‐ or undertreatment of patients. The aim was to investigate the potential frequency and clinical relevance of incorrect risk stratification using pre‐orchiectomy tumor marker levels. METHODS: A multicenter registry analysis, including patients with metastasized nonseminomatous GCT (NSGCT), was conducted by investigators of the German Testicular Cancer Study Group (GTCSG). Based on the marker levels at different timepoints, IGCCCG risk groups were calculated. The agreement was tested using Cohen's kappa. RESULTS: A total of 672 of 1910 (35%) patients were diagnosed with metastatic NSGCTs, and 523 (78%) had sufficient data for 224 follow‐up data points. By using pre‐orchiectomy tumor marker levels, 106 patients (20%) would have been incorrectly classified. Seventy‐two patients (14%) were classified into a higher risk category, and 34 patients (7%) were classified into a lower risk category. Cohen's kappa was 0.69 (p < 0.001), showing a strong agreement between the use of both marker timepoints. The treatment of misclassified patients would have resulted in an overtreatment of 72 patients or undertreatment of 34 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The use of pre‐orchiectomy tumor marker levels may lead to an incorrect risk classification and might subsequently lead to under‐ or overtreatment of patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10501278
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105012782023-09-15 Misuse of tumor marker levels leads to an insufficient International Germ Cell Consensus Classification (IGCCCG) risk group assignment and impaired treatment Majewski, Matthäus Paffenholz, Pia Ruf, Christian Che, Yue Seidel, Christoph Heinzelbecker, Julia Schmelz, Hans‐Ulrich Matthies, Cord Albers, Peter Bokemeyer, Carsten Heidenreich, Axel Pichler, Martin Nestler, Tim Cancer Med RESEARCH ARTICLES BACKGROUND: Metastatic germ cell tumors of the testis (GCTs) are risk‐stratified according to the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) classification system. This risk classification is based on anatomical risk factors as well as tumor marker levels of AFP, HCG, and LDH assessed pre‐chemotherapy after orchiectomy treatment. An incorrect classification is possible when pre‐orchiectomy marker levels are used, possibly resulting in over‐ or undertreatment of patients. The aim was to investigate the potential frequency and clinical relevance of incorrect risk stratification using pre‐orchiectomy tumor marker levels. METHODS: A multicenter registry analysis, including patients with metastasized nonseminomatous GCT (NSGCT), was conducted by investigators of the German Testicular Cancer Study Group (GTCSG). Based on the marker levels at different timepoints, IGCCCG risk groups were calculated. The agreement was tested using Cohen's kappa. RESULTS: A total of 672 of 1910 (35%) patients were diagnosed with metastatic NSGCTs, and 523 (78%) had sufficient data for 224 follow‐up data points. By using pre‐orchiectomy tumor marker levels, 106 patients (20%) would have been incorrectly classified. Seventy‐two patients (14%) were classified into a higher risk category, and 34 patients (7%) were classified into a lower risk category. Cohen's kappa was 0.69 (p < 0.001), showing a strong agreement between the use of both marker timepoints. The treatment of misclassified patients would have resulted in an overtreatment of 72 patients or undertreatment of 34 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The use of pre‐orchiectomy tumor marker levels may lead to an incorrect risk classification and might subsequently lead to under‐ or overtreatment of patients. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10501278/ /pubmed/37392170 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6304 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle RESEARCH ARTICLES
Majewski, Matthäus
Paffenholz, Pia
Ruf, Christian
Che, Yue
Seidel, Christoph
Heinzelbecker, Julia
Schmelz, Hans‐Ulrich
Matthies, Cord
Albers, Peter
Bokemeyer, Carsten
Heidenreich, Axel
Pichler, Martin
Nestler, Tim
Misuse of tumor marker levels leads to an insufficient International Germ Cell Consensus Classification (IGCCCG) risk group assignment and impaired treatment
title Misuse of tumor marker levels leads to an insufficient International Germ Cell Consensus Classification (IGCCCG) risk group assignment and impaired treatment
title_full Misuse of tumor marker levels leads to an insufficient International Germ Cell Consensus Classification (IGCCCG) risk group assignment and impaired treatment
title_fullStr Misuse of tumor marker levels leads to an insufficient International Germ Cell Consensus Classification (IGCCCG) risk group assignment and impaired treatment
title_full_unstemmed Misuse of tumor marker levels leads to an insufficient International Germ Cell Consensus Classification (IGCCCG) risk group assignment and impaired treatment
title_short Misuse of tumor marker levels leads to an insufficient International Germ Cell Consensus Classification (IGCCCG) risk group assignment and impaired treatment
title_sort misuse of tumor marker levels leads to an insufficient international germ cell consensus classification (igcccg) risk group assignment and impaired treatment
topic RESEARCH ARTICLES
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10501278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37392170
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6304
work_keys_str_mv AT majewskimatthaus misuseoftumormarkerlevelsleadstoaninsufficientinternationalgermcellconsensusclassificationigcccgriskgroupassignmentandimpairedtreatment
AT paffenholzpia misuseoftumormarkerlevelsleadstoaninsufficientinternationalgermcellconsensusclassificationigcccgriskgroupassignmentandimpairedtreatment
AT rufchristian misuseoftumormarkerlevelsleadstoaninsufficientinternationalgermcellconsensusclassificationigcccgriskgroupassignmentandimpairedtreatment
AT cheyue misuseoftumormarkerlevelsleadstoaninsufficientinternationalgermcellconsensusclassificationigcccgriskgroupassignmentandimpairedtreatment
AT seidelchristoph misuseoftumormarkerlevelsleadstoaninsufficientinternationalgermcellconsensusclassificationigcccgriskgroupassignmentandimpairedtreatment
AT heinzelbeckerjulia misuseoftumormarkerlevelsleadstoaninsufficientinternationalgermcellconsensusclassificationigcccgriskgroupassignmentandimpairedtreatment
AT schmelzhansulrich misuseoftumormarkerlevelsleadstoaninsufficientinternationalgermcellconsensusclassificationigcccgriskgroupassignmentandimpairedtreatment
AT matthiescord misuseoftumormarkerlevelsleadstoaninsufficientinternationalgermcellconsensusclassificationigcccgriskgroupassignmentandimpairedtreatment
AT alberspeter misuseoftumormarkerlevelsleadstoaninsufficientinternationalgermcellconsensusclassificationigcccgriskgroupassignmentandimpairedtreatment
AT bokemeyercarsten misuseoftumormarkerlevelsleadstoaninsufficientinternationalgermcellconsensusclassificationigcccgriskgroupassignmentandimpairedtreatment
AT heidenreichaxel misuseoftumormarkerlevelsleadstoaninsufficientinternationalgermcellconsensusclassificationigcccgriskgroupassignmentandimpairedtreatment
AT pichlermartin misuseoftumormarkerlevelsleadstoaninsufficientinternationalgermcellconsensusclassificationigcccgriskgroupassignmentandimpairedtreatment
AT nestlertim misuseoftumormarkerlevelsleadstoaninsufficientinternationalgermcellconsensusclassificationigcccgriskgroupassignmentandimpairedtreatment
AT misuseoftumormarkerlevelsleadstoaninsufficientinternationalgermcellconsensusclassificationigcccgriskgroupassignmentandimpairedtreatment