Cargando…

RPGR: Deep Phenotyping and Genetic Characterization With Findings Specific to the 3′-end of ORF15

PURPOSE: To describe a group of patients with retinitis pigmentosa GTPase regulator (RPGR)-related retinopathy with a tapetal-like retinal sheen and corresponding changes in the reflectivity of the ellipsoid zone on optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging. METHODS: A retrospective case series of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Benson, Matthew D., Mukherjee, Souvick, Agather, Aime R., Blain, Delphine, Cunningham, Denise, Mays, Robert, Sun, Xun, Li, Tiansen, Hufnagel, Robert B., Brooks, Brian P., Huryn, Laryssa A., Zein, Wadih M., Cukras, Catherine A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10501488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37695603
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.64.12.19
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To describe a group of patients with retinitis pigmentosa GTPase regulator (RPGR)-related retinopathy with a tapetal-like retinal sheen and corresponding changes in the reflectivity of the ellipsoid zone on optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging. METHODS: A retrospective case series of 66 patients with a disease-causing variant in RPGR was performed. An expert examiner, masked to patient demographics, clinical evaluations, and specific RPGR variant, analyzed color fundus photographs for the presence of a tapetal-like retinal sheen and assessed OCT images for the presence of an abnormally broad hyper-reflective band in the outer retina. Longitudinal reflectivity profiles were generated and compared with healthy controls. RESULTS: Twelve patients (18.2%) had a retinal sheen on color images that cosegregated with an abnormally broad hyper-reflective ellipsoid zone band on OCT imaging. Three-fourths of these patients were male, had a cone–rod dystrophy, and had pathogenic RPGR variants located toward the 3′-end of ORF15. This group had a different longitudinal reflectivity profile signature compared with controls. After a period of prolonged dark adaptation, the abnormal hyper-reflective band on OCT became less apparent, and the outer retinal layers adopted a more normal appearance. CONCLUSIONS: RPGR-related retinopathy should be considered for males presenting with retinal sheen, abnormal ellipsoid zone hyper-reflectivity, and cone or cone–rod dysfunction on ERG, and pursued with molecular testing. Our results have implications for understanding the role of the C-terminal domain encoded by RPGR ORF15 in the phototransduction cascade. Further, the findings may be important to incorporate into both inclusion criteria and outcome measure developments in future RPGR-related cone or cone–rod dystrophy clinical trials.