Cargando…
Better efficacy of triple antibiotics therapy for human brucellosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: The treatment of brucellosis suffers from a high recurrence rate and drug resistance. Our study researched the differences in efficacy and side effects between triple antibiotics therapy and dual antibiotics therapy in the treatment of brucellosis through a systematic review and meta-ana...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10501551/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37708094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0011590 |
_version_ | 1785106133994700800 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Shanjun Wang, Hao Li, Fande Du, Lanping Fan, Wenqi Zhao, Meifang Zhen, Hua Yan, Yuke Lu, Menghan Han, Xin Li, Zhuo Li, Mujinyan An, Shuqi Zhang, Xinyao Zhen, Qing Shui, Tiejun |
author_facet | Huang, Shanjun Wang, Hao Li, Fande Du, Lanping Fan, Wenqi Zhao, Meifang Zhen, Hua Yan, Yuke Lu, Menghan Han, Xin Li, Zhuo Li, Mujinyan An, Shuqi Zhang, Xinyao Zhen, Qing Shui, Tiejun |
author_sort | Huang, Shanjun |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The treatment of brucellosis suffers from a high recurrence rate and drug resistance. Our study researched the differences in efficacy and side effects between triple antibiotics therapy and dual antibiotics therapy in the treatment of brucellosis through a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: We searched 4 English electronic databases and 2 Chinese electronic databases for randomized controlled trials and cohort studies published through September 2022 on the use of triple antibiotics versus dual antibiotics in the treatment of brucellosis. Overall outcome indicators were therapeutic failure rate, relapse rate, overall therapeutic failure rate, and side effect rate. Relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were used as summary statistics. A fixed-effects model was used to combine the overall effect sizes. RESULTS: The meta-analysis included 15 studies consisting of 11 randomized controlled trials and 4 cohort studies. Triple antibiotics showed better efficacy than dual antibiotics in a comparison of 3 overall outcome indicators (therapeutic failure rate (RR 0.42; 95% CI 0.30 to 0.59 heterogeneity P = 0.29, I(2) = 15%), relapse rate (RR 0.29; 95% CI 0.18 to 0.45 heterogeneity P = 0.88, I(2) = 0%), and overall therapeutic failure rate (RR 0.37; 95% CI 0.28 to 0.48 heterogeneity P = 0.35, I(2) = 9%)). The incidence of side effects in patients with brucellosis treated with triple antibiotics was not significantly different from that in brucellosis patients treated with dual antibiotics (RR 0.85; 95% CI 0.67 to 1.06 heterogeneity P = 0.1, I(2) = 35%). Sensitivity analyses showed robust results and Peter’s test showed no publication bias. The results of subgroup analyses for the research type, drugs, and type of brucellosis were largely consistent with the overall outcome indicators, indicating the reliability and robustness of the overall results. CONCLUSIONS: In the treatment of brucellosis, triple antibiotics have better efficacy than dual antibiotics and do not increase the incidence of side effects. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10501551 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105015512023-09-15 Better efficacy of triple antibiotics therapy for human brucellosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis Huang, Shanjun Wang, Hao Li, Fande Du, Lanping Fan, Wenqi Zhao, Meifang Zhen, Hua Yan, Yuke Lu, Menghan Han, Xin Li, Zhuo Li, Mujinyan An, Shuqi Zhang, Xinyao Zhen, Qing Shui, Tiejun PLoS Negl Trop Dis Review BACKGROUND: The treatment of brucellosis suffers from a high recurrence rate and drug resistance. Our study researched the differences in efficacy and side effects between triple antibiotics therapy and dual antibiotics therapy in the treatment of brucellosis through a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: We searched 4 English electronic databases and 2 Chinese electronic databases for randomized controlled trials and cohort studies published through September 2022 on the use of triple antibiotics versus dual antibiotics in the treatment of brucellosis. Overall outcome indicators were therapeutic failure rate, relapse rate, overall therapeutic failure rate, and side effect rate. Relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were used as summary statistics. A fixed-effects model was used to combine the overall effect sizes. RESULTS: The meta-analysis included 15 studies consisting of 11 randomized controlled trials and 4 cohort studies. Triple antibiotics showed better efficacy than dual antibiotics in a comparison of 3 overall outcome indicators (therapeutic failure rate (RR 0.42; 95% CI 0.30 to 0.59 heterogeneity P = 0.29, I(2) = 15%), relapse rate (RR 0.29; 95% CI 0.18 to 0.45 heterogeneity P = 0.88, I(2) = 0%), and overall therapeutic failure rate (RR 0.37; 95% CI 0.28 to 0.48 heterogeneity P = 0.35, I(2) = 9%)). The incidence of side effects in patients with brucellosis treated with triple antibiotics was not significantly different from that in brucellosis patients treated with dual antibiotics (RR 0.85; 95% CI 0.67 to 1.06 heterogeneity P = 0.1, I(2) = 35%). Sensitivity analyses showed robust results and Peter’s test showed no publication bias. The results of subgroup analyses for the research type, drugs, and type of brucellosis were largely consistent with the overall outcome indicators, indicating the reliability and robustness of the overall results. CONCLUSIONS: In the treatment of brucellosis, triple antibiotics have better efficacy than dual antibiotics and do not increase the incidence of side effects. Public Library of Science 2023-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10501551/ /pubmed/37708094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0011590 Text en © 2023 Huang et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Review Huang, Shanjun Wang, Hao Li, Fande Du, Lanping Fan, Wenqi Zhao, Meifang Zhen, Hua Yan, Yuke Lu, Menghan Han, Xin Li, Zhuo Li, Mujinyan An, Shuqi Zhang, Xinyao Zhen, Qing Shui, Tiejun Better efficacy of triple antibiotics therapy for human brucellosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Better efficacy of triple antibiotics therapy for human brucellosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Better efficacy of triple antibiotics therapy for human brucellosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Better efficacy of triple antibiotics therapy for human brucellosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Better efficacy of triple antibiotics therapy for human brucellosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Better efficacy of triple antibiotics therapy for human brucellosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | better efficacy of triple antibiotics therapy for human brucellosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10501551/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37708094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0011590 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huangshanjun betterefficacyoftripleantibioticstherapyforhumanbrucellosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wanghao betterefficacyoftripleantibioticstherapyforhumanbrucellosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lifande betterefficacyoftripleantibioticstherapyforhumanbrucellosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT dulanping betterefficacyoftripleantibioticstherapyforhumanbrucellosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT fanwenqi betterefficacyoftripleantibioticstherapyforhumanbrucellosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhaomeifang betterefficacyoftripleantibioticstherapyforhumanbrucellosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhenhua betterefficacyoftripleantibioticstherapyforhumanbrucellosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yanyuke betterefficacyoftripleantibioticstherapyforhumanbrucellosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lumenghan betterefficacyoftripleantibioticstherapyforhumanbrucellosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hanxin betterefficacyoftripleantibioticstherapyforhumanbrucellosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lizhuo betterefficacyoftripleantibioticstherapyforhumanbrucellosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT limujinyan betterefficacyoftripleantibioticstherapyforhumanbrucellosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT anshuqi betterefficacyoftripleantibioticstherapyforhumanbrucellosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhangxinyao betterefficacyoftripleantibioticstherapyforhumanbrucellosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhenqing betterefficacyoftripleantibioticstherapyforhumanbrucellosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT shuitiejun betterefficacyoftripleantibioticstherapyforhumanbrucellosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |