Cargando…

Better efficacy of triple antibiotics therapy for human brucellosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: The treatment of brucellosis suffers from a high recurrence rate and drug resistance. Our study researched the differences in efficacy and side effects between triple antibiotics therapy and dual antibiotics therapy in the treatment of brucellosis through a systematic review and meta-ana...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Shanjun, Wang, Hao, Li, Fande, Du, Lanping, Fan, Wenqi, Zhao, Meifang, Zhen, Hua, Yan, Yuke, Lu, Menghan, Han, Xin, Li, Zhuo, Li, Mujinyan, An, Shuqi, Zhang, Xinyao, Zhen, Qing, Shui, Tiejun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10501551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37708094
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0011590
_version_ 1785106133994700800
author Huang, Shanjun
Wang, Hao
Li, Fande
Du, Lanping
Fan, Wenqi
Zhao, Meifang
Zhen, Hua
Yan, Yuke
Lu, Menghan
Han, Xin
Li, Zhuo
Li, Mujinyan
An, Shuqi
Zhang, Xinyao
Zhen, Qing
Shui, Tiejun
author_facet Huang, Shanjun
Wang, Hao
Li, Fande
Du, Lanping
Fan, Wenqi
Zhao, Meifang
Zhen, Hua
Yan, Yuke
Lu, Menghan
Han, Xin
Li, Zhuo
Li, Mujinyan
An, Shuqi
Zhang, Xinyao
Zhen, Qing
Shui, Tiejun
author_sort Huang, Shanjun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The treatment of brucellosis suffers from a high recurrence rate and drug resistance. Our study researched the differences in efficacy and side effects between triple antibiotics therapy and dual antibiotics therapy in the treatment of brucellosis through a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: We searched 4 English electronic databases and 2 Chinese electronic databases for randomized controlled trials and cohort studies published through September 2022 on the use of triple antibiotics versus dual antibiotics in the treatment of brucellosis. Overall outcome indicators were therapeutic failure rate, relapse rate, overall therapeutic failure rate, and side effect rate. Relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were used as summary statistics. A fixed-effects model was used to combine the overall effect sizes. RESULTS: The meta-analysis included 15 studies consisting of 11 randomized controlled trials and 4 cohort studies. Triple antibiotics showed better efficacy than dual antibiotics in a comparison of 3 overall outcome indicators (therapeutic failure rate (RR 0.42; 95% CI 0.30 to 0.59 heterogeneity P = 0.29, I(2) = 15%), relapse rate (RR 0.29; 95% CI 0.18 to 0.45 heterogeneity P = 0.88, I(2) = 0%), and overall therapeutic failure rate (RR 0.37; 95% CI 0.28 to 0.48 heterogeneity P = 0.35, I(2) = 9%)). The incidence of side effects in patients with brucellosis treated with triple antibiotics was not significantly different from that in brucellosis patients treated with dual antibiotics (RR 0.85; 95% CI 0.67 to 1.06 heterogeneity P = 0.1, I(2) = 35%). Sensitivity analyses showed robust results and Peter’s test showed no publication bias. The results of subgroup analyses for the research type, drugs, and type of brucellosis were largely consistent with the overall outcome indicators, indicating the reliability and robustness of the overall results. CONCLUSIONS: In the treatment of brucellosis, triple antibiotics have better efficacy than dual antibiotics and do not increase the incidence of side effects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10501551
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105015512023-09-15 Better efficacy of triple antibiotics therapy for human brucellosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis Huang, Shanjun Wang, Hao Li, Fande Du, Lanping Fan, Wenqi Zhao, Meifang Zhen, Hua Yan, Yuke Lu, Menghan Han, Xin Li, Zhuo Li, Mujinyan An, Shuqi Zhang, Xinyao Zhen, Qing Shui, Tiejun PLoS Negl Trop Dis Review BACKGROUND: The treatment of brucellosis suffers from a high recurrence rate and drug resistance. Our study researched the differences in efficacy and side effects between triple antibiotics therapy and dual antibiotics therapy in the treatment of brucellosis through a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: We searched 4 English electronic databases and 2 Chinese electronic databases for randomized controlled trials and cohort studies published through September 2022 on the use of triple antibiotics versus dual antibiotics in the treatment of brucellosis. Overall outcome indicators were therapeutic failure rate, relapse rate, overall therapeutic failure rate, and side effect rate. Relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were used as summary statistics. A fixed-effects model was used to combine the overall effect sizes. RESULTS: The meta-analysis included 15 studies consisting of 11 randomized controlled trials and 4 cohort studies. Triple antibiotics showed better efficacy than dual antibiotics in a comparison of 3 overall outcome indicators (therapeutic failure rate (RR 0.42; 95% CI 0.30 to 0.59 heterogeneity P = 0.29, I(2) = 15%), relapse rate (RR 0.29; 95% CI 0.18 to 0.45 heterogeneity P = 0.88, I(2) = 0%), and overall therapeutic failure rate (RR 0.37; 95% CI 0.28 to 0.48 heterogeneity P = 0.35, I(2) = 9%)). The incidence of side effects in patients with brucellosis treated with triple antibiotics was not significantly different from that in brucellosis patients treated with dual antibiotics (RR 0.85; 95% CI 0.67 to 1.06 heterogeneity P = 0.1, I(2) = 35%). Sensitivity analyses showed robust results and Peter’s test showed no publication bias. The results of subgroup analyses for the research type, drugs, and type of brucellosis were largely consistent with the overall outcome indicators, indicating the reliability and robustness of the overall results. CONCLUSIONS: In the treatment of brucellosis, triple antibiotics have better efficacy than dual antibiotics and do not increase the incidence of side effects. Public Library of Science 2023-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10501551/ /pubmed/37708094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0011590 Text en © 2023 Huang et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Review
Huang, Shanjun
Wang, Hao
Li, Fande
Du, Lanping
Fan, Wenqi
Zhao, Meifang
Zhen, Hua
Yan, Yuke
Lu, Menghan
Han, Xin
Li, Zhuo
Li, Mujinyan
An, Shuqi
Zhang, Xinyao
Zhen, Qing
Shui, Tiejun
Better efficacy of triple antibiotics therapy for human brucellosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Better efficacy of triple antibiotics therapy for human brucellosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Better efficacy of triple antibiotics therapy for human brucellosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Better efficacy of triple antibiotics therapy for human brucellosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Better efficacy of triple antibiotics therapy for human brucellosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Better efficacy of triple antibiotics therapy for human brucellosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort better efficacy of triple antibiotics therapy for human brucellosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10501551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37708094
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0011590
work_keys_str_mv AT huangshanjun betterefficacyoftripleantibioticstherapyforhumanbrucellosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wanghao betterefficacyoftripleantibioticstherapyforhumanbrucellosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lifande betterefficacyoftripleantibioticstherapyforhumanbrucellosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dulanping betterefficacyoftripleantibioticstherapyforhumanbrucellosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fanwenqi betterefficacyoftripleantibioticstherapyforhumanbrucellosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhaomeifang betterefficacyoftripleantibioticstherapyforhumanbrucellosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhenhua betterefficacyoftripleantibioticstherapyforhumanbrucellosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yanyuke betterefficacyoftripleantibioticstherapyforhumanbrucellosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lumenghan betterefficacyoftripleantibioticstherapyforhumanbrucellosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hanxin betterefficacyoftripleantibioticstherapyforhumanbrucellosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lizhuo betterefficacyoftripleantibioticstherapyforhumanbrucellosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT limujinyan betterefficacyoftripleantibioticstherapyforhumanbrucellosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT anshuqi betterefficacyoftripleantibioticstherapyforhumanbrucellosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangxinyao betterefficacyoftripleantibioticstherapyforhumanbrucellosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhenqing betterefficacyoftripleantibioticstherapyforhumanbrucellosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shuitiejun betterefficacyoftripleantibioticstherapyforhumanbrucellosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis