Cargando…

Integration of primary contact physiotherapists in the emergency department for individuals presenting with minor musculoskeletal disorders: Protocol for an economic evaluation

OBJECTIVES: 1) To compare the average cost of an emergency department (ED) visit for various minor musculoskeletal disorders between two models of care (physiotherapist and ED physician or ED physician alone); 2) To evaluate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of these two models of care...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gagnon, Rose, Hébert, Luc J., Guertin, Jason R., Berthelot, Simon, Desmeules, François, Perreault, Kadija
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10501643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37708179
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277369
_version_ 1785106155769430016
author Gagnon, Rose
Hébert, Luc J.
Guertin, Jason R.
Berthelot, Simon
Desmeules, François
Perreault, Kadija
author_facet Gagnon, Rose
Hébert, Luc J.
Guertin, Jason R.
Berthelot, Simon
Desmeules, François
Perreault, Kadija
author_sort Gagnon, Rose
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: 1) To compare the average cost of an emergency department (ED) visit for various minor musculoskeletal disorders between two models of care (physiotherapist and ED physician or ED physician alone); 2) To evaluate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of these two models of care over a 3-month period post-initial visit; and 3) To estimate the ICER of three ED models of care (physiotherapist and ED physician, ED physician alone, physiotherapist alone) over a two-year period. METHODS: Obj.1: The costs incurred by participants in the two groups during their ED visit will be calculated using the Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing (TDABC) method. These costs will be compared using generalized linear models. Obj. 2: The ICER of the two models will be evaluated over three months via a cost-utility analysis that will combine costs and effectiveness data (quality-adjusted life years) using both Health system and Societal perspectives (patient + health system costs). Obj. 3: The 2-year ICER of the three above-mentioned models will be estimated using a mathematical model including a decision tree (0–3 months post-visit) and a Markov model (3–24 months post-visit), also using both Health system and Societal perspectives. Data to answer the three objectives will come from data collected during a randomized clinical trial (n = 78, CHU de Québec)which will be supplemented with data obtained via some of the CHU de Québec administrative databases (nominative data; SIURGE (ED management software), Cristal-Net (patient electronic record), and the ED’s pharmacy transactions directory; administrative data: drug costs repository), the literature, and public cost repositories. CONCLUSION: This study will help to determine which model of care is most efficient for the management of individuals who come to the ED with minor musculoskeletal disorders. The increased involvement of various health professionals in the management of patients in the ED paves the way for the development of new avenues of practice and more efficient organization of services.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10501643
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105016432023-09-15 Integration of primary contact physiotherapists in the emergency department for individuals presenting with minor musculoskeletal disorders: Protocol for an economic evaluation Gagnon, Rose Hébert, Luc J. Guertin, Jason R. Berthelot, Simon Desmeules, François Perreault, Kadija PLoS One Study Protocol OBJECTIVES: 1) To compare the average cost of an emergency department (ED) visit for various minor musculoskeletal disorders between two models of care (physiotherapist and ED physician or ED physician alone); 2) To evaluate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of these two models of care over a 3-month period post-initial visit; and 3) To estimate the ICER of three ED models of care (physiotherapist and ED physician, ED physician alone, physiotherapist alone) over a two-year period. METHODS: Obj.1: The costs incurred by participants in the two groups during their ED visit will be calculated using the Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing (TDABC) method. These costs will be compared using generalized linear models. Obj. 2: The ICER of the two models will be evaluated over three months via a cost-utility analysis that will combine costs and effectiveness data (quality-adjusted life years) using both Health system and Societal perspectives (patient + health system costs). Obj. 3: The 2-year ICER of the three above-mentioned models will be estimated using a mathematical model including a decision tree (0–3 months post-visit) and a Markov model (3–24 months post-visit), also using both Health system and Societal perspectives. Data to answer the three objectives will come from data collected during a randomized clinical trial (n = 78, CHU de Québec)which will be supplemented with data obtained via some of the CHU de Québec administrative databases (nominative data; SIURGE (ED management software), Cristal-Net (patient electronic record), and the ED’s pharmacy transactions directory; administrative data: drug costs repository), the literature, and public cost repositories. CONCLUSION: This study will help to determine which model of care is most efficient for the management of individuals who come to the ED with minor musculoskeletal disorders. The increased involvement of various health professionals in the management of patients in the ED paves the way for the development of new avenues of practice and more efficient organization of services. Public Library of Science 2023-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10501643/ /pubmed/37708179 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277369 Text en © 2023 Gagnon et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Gagnon, Rose
Hébert, Luc J.
Guertin, Jason R.
Berthelot, Simon
Desmeules, François
Perreault, Kadija
Integration of primary contact physiotherapists in the emergency department for individuals presenting with minor musculoskeletal disorders: Protocol for an economic evaluation
title Integration of primary contact physiotherapists in the emergency department for individuals presenting with minor musculoskeletal disorders: Protocol for an economic evaluation
title_full Integration of primary contact physiotherapists in the emergency department for individuals presenting with minor musculoskeletal disorders: Protocol for an economic evaluation
title_fullStr Integration of primary contact physiotherapists in the emergency department for individuals presenting with minor musculoskeletal disorders: Protocol for an economic evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Integration of primary contact physiotherapists in the emergency department for individuals presenting with minor musculoskeletal disorders: Protocol for an economic evaluation
title_short Integration of primary contact physiotherapists in the emergency department for individuals presenting with minor musculoskeletal disorders: Protocol for an economic evaluation
title_sort integration of primary contact physiotherapists in the emergency department for individuals presenting with minor musculoskeletal disorders: protocol for an economic evaluation
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10501643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37708179
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277369
work_keys_str_mv AT gagnonrose integrationofprimarycontactphysiotherapistsintheemergencydepartmentforindividualspresentingwithminormusculoskeletaldisordersprotocolforaneconomicevaluation
AT hebertlucj integrationofprimarycontactphysiotherapistsintheemergencydepartmentforindividualspresentingwithminormusculoskeletaldisordersprotocolforaneconomicevaluation
AT guertinjasonr integrationofprimarycontactphysiotherapistsintheemergencydepartmentforindividualspresentingwithminormusculoskeletaldisordersprotocolforaneconomicevaluation
AT berthelotsimon integrationofprimarycontactphysiotherapistsintheemergencydepartmentforindividualspresentingwithminormusculoskeletaldisordersprotocolforaneconomicevaluation
AT desmeulesfrancois integrationofprimarycontactphysiotherapistsintheemergencydepartmentforindividualspresentingwithminormusculoskeletaldisordersprotocolforaneconomicevaluation
AT perreaultkadija integrationofprimarycontactphysiotherapistsintheemergencydepartmentforindividualspresentingwithminormusculoskeletaldisordersprotocolforaneconomicevaluation