Cargando…

Do single‐case experimental designs lead to randomised controlled trials of cognitive behavioural therapy interventions for adolescent anxiety and related disorders recommended in the National Institute of Clinical Excellence guidelines? A systematic review

BACKGROUND: Although Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) is effective for 60% of adolescents with anxiety disorders, only 36% are in remission post‐intervention. This indicates that more effective treatments are needed which should be reflected in the NICE guidelines. We hypothesised that Single‐cas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cawthorne, Tom, Käll, Anton, Bennett, Sophie, Baker, Elena, Cheung, Emily, Shafran, Roz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10501697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37720579
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcv2.12181
_version_ 1785106167932911616
author Cawthorne, Tom
Käll, Anton
Bennett, Sophie
Baker, Elena
Cheung, Emily
Shafran, Roz
author_facet Cawthorne, Tom
Käll, Anton
Bennett, Sophie
Baker, Elena
Cheung, Emily
Shafran, Roz
author_sort Cawthorne, Tom
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) is effective for 60% of adolescents with anxiety disorders, only 36% are in remission post‐intervention. This indicates that more effective treatments are needed which should be reflected in the NICE guidelines. We hypothesised that Single‐case experimental designs (SCEDs) may provide a framework for accelerating the development of novel interventions. The primary purpose of this review was to investigate whether SCEDs are currently followed by randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of CBT intervention for adolescent anxiety disorders named in the NICE guidelines. The secondary objective was to investigate whether using SCEDs prior to RCTs could be a helpful approach. METHOD: For the primary search of SCEDs five databases were used (PsycINFO, PubMed, PsycArticles, Web of Science and ProQuest). Nineteen articles met eligibility criteria including a total of 107 participants. For the secondary search of RCTs named in the NICE guidelines for adolescent anxiety disorders 53 articles met inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review. RESULTS: The 19 SCED studies included in the review were conducted with participants with a diverse range of anxiety disorders and across a range of CBT formats. Two of the SCEDs were followed by RCTs, but neither of these were named in the NICE guidelines for anxiety disorders. All of the SCEDs identified were rated as low quality with none meeting the criteria for the highest or second highest quality rating. From the secondary searches, none of the RCTs named in the NICE guide were preceded by SCEDs. CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that currently SCEDs were not followed by RCTs of CBT interventions named in the NICE guidelines for adolescent anxiety disorders. However, it was suggested that SCEDs may provide an important framework for the development of more effective interventions for adolescents with anxiety.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10501697
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105016972023-09-15 Do single‐case experimental designs lead to randomised controlled trials of cognitive behavioural therapy interventions for adolescent anxiety and related disorders recommended in the National Institute of Clinical Excellence guidelines? A systematic review Cawthorne, Tom Käll, Anton Bennett, Sophie Baker, Elena Cheung, Emily Shafran, Roz JCPP Adv Research Reviews BACKGROUND: Although Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) is effective for 60% of adolescents with anxiety disorders, only 36% are in remission post‐intervention. This indicates that more effective treatments are needed which should be reflected in the NICE guidelines. We hypothesised that Single‐case experimental designs (SCEDs) may provide a framework for accelerating the development of novel interventions. The primary purpose of this review was to investigate whether SCEDs are currently followed by randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of CBT intervention for adolescent anxiety disorders named in the NICE guidelines. The secondary objective was to investigate whether using SCEDs prior to RCTs could be a helpful approach. METHOD: For the primary search of SCEDs five databases were used (PsycINFO, PubMed, PsycArticles, Web of Science and ProQuest). Nineteen articles met eligibility criteria including a total of 107 participants. For the secondary search of RCTs named in the NICE guidelines for adolescent anxiety disorders 53 articles met inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review. RESULTS: The 19 SCED studies included in the review were conducted with participants with a diverse range of anxiety disorders and across a range of CBT formats. Two of the SCEDs were followed by RCTs, but neither of these were named in the NICE guidelines for anxiety disorders. All of the SCEDs identified were rated as low quality with none meeting the criteria for the highest or second highest quality rating. From the secondary searches, none of the RCTs named in the NICE guide were preceded by SCEDs. CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that currently SCEDs were not followed by RCTs of CBT interventions named in the NICE guidelines for adolescent anxiety disorders. However, it was suggested that SCEDs may provide an important framework for the development of more effective interventions for adolescents with anxiety. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10501697/ /pubmed/37720579 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcv2.12181 Text en © 2023 The Authors. JCPP Advances published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Reviews
Cawthorne, Tom
Käll, Anton
Bennett, Sophie
Baker, Elena
Cheung, Emily
Shafran, Roz
Do single‐case experimental designs lead to randomised controlled trials of cognitive behavioural therapy interventions for adolescent anxiety and related disorders recommended in the National Institute of Clinical Excellence guidelines? A systematic review
title Do single‐case experimental designs lead to randomised controlled trials of cognitive behavioural therapy interventions for adolescent anxiety and related disorders recommended in the National Institute of Clinical Excellence guidelines? A systematic review
title_full Do single‐case experimental designs lead to randomised controlled trials of cognitive behavioural therapy interventions for adolescent anxiety and related disorders recommended in the National Institute of Clinical Excellence guidelines? A systematic review
title_fullStr Do single‐case experimental designs lead to randomised controlled trials of cognitive behavioural therapy interventions for adolescent anxiety and related disorders recommended in the National Institute of Clinical Excellence guidelines? A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Do single‐case experimental designs lead to randomised controlled trials of cognitive behavioural therapy interventions for adolescent anxiety and related disorders recommended in the National Institute of Clinical Excellence guidelines? A systematic review
title_short Do single‐case experimental designs lead to randomised controlled trials of cognitive behavioural therapy interventions for adolescent anxiety and related disorders recommended in the National Institute of Clinical Excellence guidelines? A systematic review
title_sort do single‐case experimental designs lead to randomised controlled trials of cognitive behavioural therapy interventions for adolescent anxiety and related disorders recommended in the national institute of clinical excellence guidelines? a systematic review
topic Research Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10501697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37720579
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcv2.12181
work_keys_str_mv AT cawthornetom dosinglecaseexperimentaldesignsleadtorandomisedcontrolledtrialsofcognitivebehaviouraltherapyinterventionsforadolescentanxietyandrelateddisordersrecommendedinthenationalinstituteofclinicalexcellenceguidelinesasystematicreview
AT kallanton dosinglecaseexperimentaldesignsleadtorandomisedcontrolledtrialsofcognitivebehaviouraltherapyinterventionsforadolescentanxietyandrelateddisordersrecommendedinthenationalinstituteofclinicalexcellenceguidelinesasystematicreview
AT bennettsophie dosinglecaseexperimentaldesignsleadtorandomisedcontrolledtrialsofcognitivebehaviouraltherapyinterventionsforadolescentanxietyandrelateddisordersrecommendedinthenationalinstituteofclinicalexcellenceguidelinesasystematicreview
AT bakerelena dosinglecaseexperimentaldesignsleadtorandomisedcontrolledtrialsofcognitivebehaviouraltherapyinterventionsforadolescentanxietyandrelateddisordersrecommendedinthenationalinstituteofclinicalexcellenceguidelinesasystematicreview
AT cheungemily dosinglecaseexperimentaldesignsleadtorandomisedcontrolledtrialsofcognitivebehaviouraltherapyinterventionsforadolescentanxietyandrelateddisordersrecommendedinthenationalinstituteofclinicalexcellenceguidelinesasystematicreview
AT shafranroz dosinglecaseexperimentaldesignsleadtorandomisedcontrolledtrialsofcognitivebehaviouraltherapyinterventionsforadolescentanxietyandrelateddisordersrecommendedinthenationalinstituteofclinicalexcellenceguidelinesasystematicreview