Cargando…
Machine learning model for predicting late recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation
Late recurrence of atrial fibrillation (LRAF) in the first year following catheter ablation is a common and significant clinical problem. Our study aimed to create a machine-learning model for predicting arrhythmic recurrence within the first year since catheter ablation. The study comprised 201 con...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10502018/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37709859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42542-y |
_version_ | 1785106227482591232 |
---|---|
author | Budzianowski, Jan Kaczmarek-Majer, Katarzyna Rzeźniczak, Janusz Słomczyński, Marek Wichrowski, Filip Hiczkiewicz, Dariusz Musielak, Bogdan Grydz, Łukasz Hiczkiewicz, Jarosław Burchardt, Paweł |
author_facet | Budzianowski, Jan Kaczmarek-Majer, Katarzyna Rzeźniczak, Janusz Słomczyński, Marek Wichrowski, Filip Hiczkiewicz, Dariusz Musielak, Bogdan Grydz, Łukasz Hiczkiewicz, Jarosław Burchardt, Paweł |
author_sort | Budzianowski, Jan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Late recurrence of atrial fibrillation (LRAF) in the first year following catheter ablation is a common and significant clinical problem. Our study aimed to create a machine-learning model for predicting arrhythmic recurrence within the first year since catheter ablation. The study comprised 201 consecutive patients (age: 61.8 ± 8.1; women 36%) with paroxysmal, persistent, and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent cryoballoon (61%) and radiofrequency ablation (39%). Five different supervised machine-learning models (decision tree, logistic regression, random forest, XGBoost, support vector machines) were developed for predicting AF recurrence. Further, SHapley Additive exPlanations were derived to explain the predictions using 82 parameters based on clinical, laboratory, and procedural variables collected from each patient. The models were trained and validated using a stratified fivefold cross-validation, and a feature selection was performed with permutation importance. The XGBoost model with 12 variables showed the best performance on the testing cohort, with the highest AUC of 0.75 [95% confidence interval 0.7395, 0.7653]. The machine-learned model, based on the easily available 12 clinical and laboratory variables, predicted LRAF with good performance, which may provide a valuable tool in clinical practice for better patient selection and personalized AF strategy following the procedure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10502018 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105020182023-09-16 Machine learning model for predicting late recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation Budzianowski, Jan Kaczmarek-Majer, Katarzyna Rzeźniczak, Janusz Słomczyński, Marek Wichrowski, Filip Hiczkiewicz, Dariusz Musielak, Bogdan Grydz, Łukasz Hiczkiewicz, Jarosław Burchardt, Paweł Sci Rep Article Late recurrence of atrial fibrillation (LRAF) in the first year following catheter ablation is a common and significant clinical problem. Our study aimed to create a machine-learning model for predicting arrhythmic recurrence within the first year since catheter ablation. The study comprised 201 consecutive patients (age: 61.8 ± 8.1; women 36%) with paroxysmal, persistent, and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent cryoballoon (61%) and radiofrequency ablation (39%). Five different supervised machine-learning models (decision tree, logistic regression, random forest, XGBoost, support vector machines) were developed for predicting AF recurrence. Further, SHapley Additive exPlanations were derived to explain the predictions using 82 parameters based on clinical, laboratory, and procedural variables collected from each patient. The models were trained and validated using a stratified fivefold cross-validation, and a feature selection was performed with permutation importance. The XGBoost model with 12 variables showed the best performance on the testing cohort, with the highest AUC of 0.75 [95% confidence interval 0.7395, 0.7653]. The machine-learned model, based on the easily available 12 clinical and laboratory variables, predicted LRAF with good performance, which may provide a valuable tool in clinical practice for better patient selection and personalized AF strategy following the procedure. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10502018/ /pubmed/37709859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42542-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Budzianowski, Jan Kaczmarek-Majer, Katarzyna Rzeźniczak, Janusz Słomczyński, Marek Wichrowski, Filip Hiczkiewicz, Dariusz Musielak, Bogdan Grydz, Łukasz Hiczkiewicz, Jarosław Burchardt, Paweł Machine learning model for predicting late recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation |
title | Machine learning model for predicting late recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation |
title_full | Machine learning model for predicting late recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation |
title_fullStr | Machine learning model for predicting late recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation |
title_full_unstemmed | Machine learning model for predicting late recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation |
title_short | Machine learning model for predicting late recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation |
title_sort | machine learning model for predicting late recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10502018/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37709859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42542-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT budzianowskijan machinelearningmodelforpredictinglaterecurrenceofatrialfibrillationaftercatheterablation AT kaczmarekmajerkatarzyna machinelearningmodelforpredictinglaterecurrenceofatrialfibrillationaftercatheterablation AT rzezniczakjanusz machinelearningmodelforpredictinglaterecurrenceofatrialfibrillationaftercatheterablation AT słomczynskimarek machinelearningmodelforpredictinglaterecurrenceofatrialfibrillationaftercatheterablation AT wichrowskifilip machinelearningmodelforpredictinglaterecurrenceofatrialfibrillationaftercatheterablation AT hiczkiewiczdariusz machinelearningmodelforpredictinglaterecurrenceofatrialfibrillationaftercatheterablation AT musielakbogdan machinelearningmodelforpredictinglaterecurrenceofatrialfibrillationaftercatheterablation AT grydzłukasz machinelearningmodelforpredictinglaterecurrenceofatrialfibrillationaftercatheterablation AT hiczkiewiczjarosław machinelearningmodelforpredictinglaterecurrenceofatrialfibrillationaftercatheterablation AT burchardtpaweł machinelearningmodelforpredictinglaterecurrenceofatrialfibrillationaftercatheterablation |