Cargando…

Machine learning model for predicting late recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation

Late recurrence of atrial fibrillation (LRAF) in the first year following catheter ablation is a common and significant clinical problem. Our study aimed to create a machine-learning model for predicting arrhythmic recurrence within the first year since catheter ablation. The study comprised 201 con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Budzianowski, Jan, Kaczmarek-Majer, Katarzyna, Rzeźniczak, Janusz, Słomczyński, Marek, Wichrowski, Filip, Hiczkiewicz, Dariusz, Musielak, Bogdan, Grydz, Łukasz, Hiczkiewicz, Jarosław, Burchardt, Paweł
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10502018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37709859
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42542-y
_version_ 1785106227482591232
author Budzianowski, Jan
Kaczmarek-Majer, Katarzyna
Rzeźniczak, Janusz
Słomczyński, Marek
Wichrowski, Filip
Hiczkiewicz, Dariusz
Musielak, Bogdan
Grydz, Łukasz
Hiczkiewicz, Jarosław
Burchardt, Paweł
author_facet Budzianowski, Jan
Kaczmarek-Majer, Katarzyna
Rzeźniczak, Janusz
Słomczyński, Marek
Wichrowski, Filip
Hiczkiewicz, Dariusz
Musielak, Bogdan
Grydz, Łukasz
Hiczkiewicz, Jarosław
Burchardt, Paweł
author_sort Budzianowski, Jan
collection PubMed
description Late recurrence of atrial fibrillation (LRAF) in the first year following catheter ablation is a common and significant clinical problem. Our study aimed to create a machine-learning model for predicting arrhythmic recurrence within the first year since catheter ablation. The study comprised 201 consecutive patients (age: 61.8 ± 8.1; women 36%) with paroxysmal, persistent, and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent cryoballoon (61%) and radiofrequency ablation (39%). Five different supervised machine-learning models (decision tree, logistic regression, random forest, XGBoost, support vector machines) were developed for predicting AF recurrence. Further, SHapley Additive exPlanations were derived to explain the predictions using 82 parameters based on clinical, laboratory, and procedural variables collected from each patient. The models were trained and validated using a stratified fivefold cross-validation, and a feature selection was performed with permutation importance. The XGBoost model with 12 variables showed the best performance on the testing cohort, with the highest AUC of 0.75 [95% confidence interval 0.7395, 0.7653]. The machine-learned model, based on the easily available 12 clinical and laboratory variables, predicted LRAF with good performance, which may provide a valuable tool in clinical practice for better patient selection and personalized AF strategy following the procedure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10502018
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105020182023-09-16 Machine learning model for predicting late recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation Budzianowski, Jan Kaczmarek-Majer, Katarzyna Rzeźniczak, Janusz Słomczyński, Marek Wichrowski, Filip Hiczkiewicz, Dariusz Musielak, Bogdan Grydz, Łukasz Hiczkiewicz, Jarosław Burchardt, Paweł Sci Rep Article Late recurrence of atrial fibrillation (LRAF) in the first year following catheter ablation is a common and significant clinical problem. Our study aimed to create a machine-learning model for predicting arrhythmic recurrence within the first year since catheter ablation. The study comprised 201 consecutive patients (age: 61.8 ± 8.1; women 36%) with paroxysmal, persistent, and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent cryoballoon (61%) and radiofrequency ablation (39%). Five different supervised machine-learning models (decision tree, logistic regression, random forest, XGBoost, support vector machines) were developed for predicting AF recurrence. Further, SHapley Additive exPlanations were derived to explain the predictions using 82 parameters based on clinical, laboratory, and procedural variables collected from each patient. The models were trained and validated using a stratified fivefold cross-validation, and a feature selection was performed with permutation importance. The XGBoost model with 12 variables showed the best performance on the testing cohort, with the highest AUC of 0.75 [95% confidence interval 0.7395, 0.7653]. The machine-learned model, based on the easily available 12 clinical and laboratory variables, predicted LRAF with good performance, which may provide a valuable tool in clinical practice for better patient selection and personalized AF strategy following the procedure. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10502018/ /pubmed/37709859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42542-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Budzianowski, Jan
Kaczmarek-Majer, Katarzyna
Rzeźniczak, Janusz
Słomczyński, Marek
Wichrowski, Filip
Hiczkiewicz, Dariusz
Musielak, Bogdan
Grydz, Łukasz
Hiczkiewicz, Jarosław
Burchardt, Paweł
Machine learning model for predicting late recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation
title Machine learning model for predicting late recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation
title_full Machine learning model for predicting late recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation
title_fullStr Machine learning model for predicting late recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation
title_full_unstemmed Machine learning model for predicting late recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation
title_short Machine learning model for predicting late recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation
title_sort machine learning model for predicting late recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10502018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37709859
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42542-y
work_keys_str_mv AT budzianowskijan machinelearningmodelforpredictinglaterecurrenceofatrialfibrillationaftercatheterablation
AT kaczmarekmajerkatarzyna machinelearningmodelforpredictinglaterecurrenceofatrialfibrillationaftercatheterablation
AT rzezniczakjanusz machinelearningmodelforpredictinglaterecurrenceofatrialfibrillationaftercatheterablation
AT słomczynskimarek machinelearningmodelforpredictinglaterecurrenceofatrialfibrillationaftercatheterablation
AT wichrowskifilip machinelearningmodelforpredictinglaterecurrenceofatrialfibrillationaftercatheterablation
AT hiczkiewiczdariusz machinelearningmodelforpredictinglaterecurrenceofatrialfibrillationaftercatheterablation
AT musielakbogdan machinelearningmodelforpredictinglaterecurrenceofatrialfibrillationaftercatheterablation
AT grydzłukasz machinelearningmodelforpredictinglaterecurrenceofatrialfibrillationaftercatheterablation
AT hiczkiewiczjarosław machinelearningmodelforpredictinglaterecurrenceofatrialfibrillationaftercatheterablation
AT burchardtpaweł machinelearningmodelforpredictinglaterecurrenceofatrialfibrillationaftercatheterablation