Cargando…

Researching the level of agreement among experts on terms used to describe wounds: An international study

Establishing a common language that allows univocal and objective communication in describing wounds and their healing is of utmost importance in defining the diagnostic hypothesis and proper wound management. To measure the level of agreement on the description of wounds, an international study was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Greco, Alessandro, Mastronicola, Diego, Pacini, Francesco, Giacomelli, Luca, Papa, Simonetta, Fiorentini, Chiara, David, Valentina, Rowan, Sara, Mennini, Natascia, Magnoni, Cristina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10502252/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37074266
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14164
_version_ 1785106280722989056
author Greco, Alessandro
Mastronicola, Diego
Pacini, Francesco
Giacomelli, Luca
Papa, Simonetta
Fiorentini, Chiara
David, Valentina
Rowan, Sara
Mennini, Natascia
Magnoni, Cristina
author_facet Greco, Alessandro
Mastronicola, Diego
Pacini, Francesco
Giacomelli, Luca
Papa, Simonetta
Fiorentini, Chiara
David, Valentina
Rowan, Sara
Mennini, Natascia
Magnoni, Cristina
author_sort Greco, Alessandro
collection PubMed
description Establishing a common language that allows univocal and objective communication in describing wounds and their healing is of utmost importance in defining the diagnostic hypothesis and proper wound management. To measure the level of agreement on the description of wounds, an international study was performed among experts of different professional backgrounds on several common terms used to describe ulcerative lesions. A panel of 27 wound care experts anonymously completed a multiple‐choice questionnaire on 100 images of 50 ulcerative lesions. The participants were asked to describe each image using a set of pre‐defined terms. An expert data analyst interpreted the questionnaires to map the level of agreement on the used terminology. Our findings show a very low level of agreement among experts in using the proposed terminology to describe the wound bed, the wound edge, and the surrounding skin conditions. Efforts should be planned to find a consensus on the correct use of terminology for wound description. To this aim, partnership, consensus, and agreement with educators in medicine and nursing are necessary.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10502252
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105022522023-09-16 Researching the level of agreement among experts on terms used to describe wounds: An international study Greco, Alessandro Mastronicola, Diego Pacini, Francesco Giacomelli, Luca Papa, Simonetta Fiorentini, Chiara David, Valentina Rowan, Sara Mennini, Natascia Magnoni, Cristina Int Wound J Original Articles Establishing a common language that allows univocal and objective communication in describing wounds and their healing is of utmost importance in defining the diagnostic hypothesis and proper wound management. To measure the level of agreement on the description of wounds, an international study was performed among experts of different professional backgrounds on several common terms used to describe ulcerative lesions. A panel of 27 wound care experts anonymously completed a multiple‐choice questionnaire on 100 images of 50 ulcerative lesions. The participants were asked to describe each image using a set of pre‐defined terms. An expert data analyst interpreted the questionnaires to map the level of agreement on the used terminology. Our findings show a very low level of agreement among experts in using the proposed terminology to describe the wound bed, the wound edge, and the surrounding skin conditions. Efforts should be planned to find a consensus on the correct use of terminology for wound description. To this aim, partnership, consensus, and agreement with educators in medicine and nursing are necessary. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2023-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10502252/ /pubmed/37074266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14164 Text en © 2023 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Greco, Alessandro
Mastronicola, Diego
Pacini, Francesco
Giacomelli, Luca
Papa, Simonetta
Fiorentini, Chiara
David, Valentina
Rowan, Sara
Mennini, Natascia
Magnoni, Cristina
Researching the level of agreement among experts on terms used to describe wounds: An international study
title Researching the level of agreement among experts on terms used to describe wounds: An international study
title_full Researching the level of agreement among experts on terms used to describe wounds: An international study
title_fullStr Researching the level of agreement among experts on terms used to describe wounds: An international study
title_full_unstemmed Researching the level of agreement among experts on terms used to describe wounds: An international study
title_short Researching the level of agreement among experts on terms used to describe wounds: An international study
title_sort researching the level of agreement among experts on terms used to describe wounds: an international study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10502252/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37074266
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14164
work_keys_str_mv AT grecoalessandro researchingthelevelofagreementamongexpertsontermsusedtodescribewoundsaninternationalstudy
AT mastronicoladiego researchingthelevelofagreementamongexpertsontermsusedtodescribewoundsaninternationalstudy
AT pacinifrancesco researchingthelevelofagreementamongexpertsontermsusedtodescribewoundsaninternationalstudy
AT giacomelliluca researchingthelevelofagreementamongexpertsontermsusedtodescribewoundsaninternationalstudy
AT papasimonetta researchingthelevelofagreementamongexpertsontermsusedtodescribewoundsaninternationalstudy
AT fiorentinichiara researchingthelevelofagreementamongexpertsontermsusedtodescribewoundsaninternationalstudy
AT davidvalentina researchingthelevelofagreementamongexpertsontermsusedtodescribewoundsaninternationalstudy
AT rowansara researchingthelevelofagreementamongexpertsontermsusedtodescribewoundsaninternationalstudy
AT mennininatascia researchingthelevelofagreementamongexpertsontermsusedtodescribewoundsaninternationalstudy
AT magnonicristina researchingthelevelofagreementamongexpertsontermsusedtodescribewoundsaninternationalstudy
AT researchingthelevelofagreementamongexpertsontermsusedtodescribewoundsaninternationalstudy