Cargando…

In‐hospital nursing care intervention increasing the effect of vacuum sealing drainage on wound healing: A meta‐analysis

Vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) could effectively drain superficial wounds and deep tissues, which is beneficial for wound healing. More incentives in nursing care to improve the therapeutic effect of VSD on wound healing were further investigated. Different databases were retrieved for full‐text publ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yu, Lan, Wang, Yiling, Ma, Dongmei, Pan, Liming, Liu, Xinyang, Chu, Tianyue, Yin, Baoyue, Huang, Lei, Xu, Xin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10502262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37042301
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14169
_version_ 1785106283068653568
author Yu, Lan
Wang, Yiling
Ma, Dongmei
Pan, Liming
Liu, Xinyang
Chu, Tianyue
Yin, Baoyue
Huang, Lei
Xu, Xin
author_facet Yu, Lan
Wang, Yiling
Ma, Dongmei
Pan, Liming
Liu, Xinyang
Chu, Tianyue
Yin, Baoyue
Huang, Lei
Xu, Xin
author_sort Yu, Lan
collection PubMed
description Vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) could effectively drain superficial wounds and deep tissues, which is beneficial for wound healing. More incentives in nursing care to improve the therapeutic effect of VSD on wound healing were further investigated. Different databases were retrieved for full‐text publications about the comparison between intervention nursing care and regular nursing care. Heterogeneity was detected by I ( 2 ) method, and a random‐effect model was applied for data pooling if there existed heterogeneity. Publication bias was analysed by a funnel plot. Eight studies with 762 patients were included for final meta‐analysis. In the nursing care intervention group, shorter hospital stay duration (pooled SMD = −2.602, 95% confidence interval: −4.052–−1.151), shorter wound healing time (pooled SMD = −1.105, 95% confidence interval: −1.857–−0.353), lower pain score (pooled SMD = −2.490, 95% confidence interval: −3.521–−1.458), lower drainage tube blocked rate (pooled RR = 0.361, 95% confidence interval: 0.268–0.486), and higher nursing satisfaction (pooled RR = 1.164, 95% confidence interval: 1.095–1.237) was confirmed. More active and incentive nursing care could significantly improve the therapeutic effect of VSD on wound healing, in terms of hospitalisation time, wound healing time, painful symptoms, drainage tube blockage, and nursing satisfaction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10502262
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105022622023-09-16 In‐hospital nursing care intervention increasing the effect of vacuum sealing drainage on wound healing: A meta‐analysis Yu, Lan Wang, Yiling Ma, Dongmei Pan, Liming Liu, Xinyang Chu, Tianyue Yin, Baoyue Huang, Lei Xu, Xin Int Wound J Review Articles Vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) could effectively drain superficial wounds and deep tissues, which is beneficial for wound healing. More incentives in nursing care to improve the therapeutic effect of VSD on wound healing were further investigated. Different databases were retrieved for full‐text publications about the comparison between intervention nursing care and regular nursing care. Heterogeneity was detected by I ( 2 ) method, and a random‐effect model was applied for data pooling if there existed heterogeneity. Publication bias was analysed by a funnel plot. Eight studies with 762 patients were included for final meta‐analysis. In the nursing care intervention group, shorter hospital stay duration (pooled SMD = −2.602, 95% confidence interval: −4.052–−1.151), shorter wound healing time (pooled SMD = −1.105, 95% confidence interval: −1.857–−0.353), lower pain score (pooled SMD = −2.490, 95% confidence interval: −3.521–−1.458), lower drainage tube blocked rate (pooled RR = 0.361, 95% confidence interval: 0.268–0.486), and higher nursing satisfaction (pooled RR = 1.164, 95% confidence interval: 1.095–1.237) was confirmed. More active and incentive nursing care could significantly improve the therapeutic effect of VSD on wound healing, in terms of hospitalisation time, wound healing time, painful symptoms, drainage tube blockage, and nursing satisfaction. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2023-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10502262/ /pubmed/37042301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14169 Text en © 2023 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Yu, Lan
Wang, Yiling
Ma, Dongmei
Pan, Liming
Liu, Xinyang
Chu, Tianyue
Yin, Baoyue
Huang, Lei
Xu, Xin
In‐hospital nursing care intervention increasing the effect of vacuum sealing drainage on wound healing: A meta‐analysis
title In‐hospital nursing care intervention increasing the effect of vacuum sealing drainage on wound healing: A meta‐analysis
title_full In‐hospital nursing care intervention increasing the effect of vacuum sealing drainage on wound healing: A meta‐analysis
title_fullStr In‐hospital nursing care intervention increasing the effect of vacuum sealing drainage on wound healing: A meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed In‐hospital nursing care intervention increasing the effect of vacuum sealing drainage on wound healing: A meta‐analysis
title_short In‐hospital nursing care intervention increasing the effect of vacuum sealing drainage on wound healing: A meta‐analysis
title_sort in‐hospital nursing care intervention increasing the effect of vacuum sealing drainage on wound healing: a meta‐analysis
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10502262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37042301
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14169
work_keys_str_mv AT yulan inhospitalnursingcareinterventionincreasingtheeffectofvacuumsealingdrainageonwoundhealingametaanalysis
AT wangyiling inhospitalnursingcareinterventionincreasingtheeffectofvacuumsealingdrainageonwoundhealingametaanalysis
AT madongmei inhospitalnursingcareinterventionincreasingtheeffectofvacuumsealingdrainageonwoundhealingametaanalysis
AT panliming inhospitalnursingcareinterventionincreasingtheeffectofvacuumsealingdrainageonwoundhealingametaanalysis
AT liuxinyang inhospitalnursingcareinterventionincreasingtheeffectofvacuumsealingdrainageonwoundhealingametaanalysis
AT chutianyue inhospitalnursingcareinterventionincreasingtheeffectofvacuumsealingdrainageonwoundhealingametaanalysis
AT yinbaoyue inhospitalnursingcareinterventionincreasingtheeffectofvacuumsealingdrainageonwoundhealingametaanalysis
AT huanglei inhospitalnursingcareinterventionincreasingtheeffectofvacuumsealingdrainageonwoundhealingametaanalysis
AT xuxin inhospitalnursingcareinterventionincreasingtheeffectofvacuumsealingdrainageonwoundhealingametaanalysis