Cargando…

The relationship between vitamin D deficiency and diabetic foot ulcer: A meta‐analysis

A meta‐analysis investigation to measure the relationship between vitamin D deficiency (VDD) and diabetic foot ulcer (DFU). A comprehensive literature inspection till February 2023 was applied and 1765 interrelated investigations were reviewed. The 15 chosen investigations enclosed 2648 individuals...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Xin, Kou, Shaojie, Chen, Guo, Zhao, Bingjie, Xue, Jingdong, Ding, Rui, Zhao, Xiaoyan, Ye, Miaoqing, Yang, Yueqing, Yue, Rensong, Li, Fenping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10502267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37194326
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14177
Descripción
Sumario:A meta‐analysis investigation to measure the relationship between vitamin D deficiency (VDD) and diabetic foot ulcer (DFU). A comprehensive literature inspection till February 2023 was applied and 1765 interrelated investigations were reviewed. The 15 chosen investigations enclosed 2648 individuals with diabetes mellitus in the chosen investigations' starting point, 1413 of them were with DFUs, and 1235 were without DFUs. Odds ratio (OR) in addition to 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to compute the value of the relationship between VDD and DFU by the dichotomous and continuous approaches and a fixed or random model. Individuals with DFUs had significantly lower vitamin D levels (VDL) (MD, −7.14; 95% CI, −8.83 to −5.44, P < 0.001) compared to those without DFU individuals. Individuals with DFUs had a significantly higher number of VDD individuals (OR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.63‐3.16, P < 0.001) compared to those without DFU individuals. Individuals with DFU had significantly lower VDL and a significantly higher number of VDD individuals compared to those without DFU individuals. However, caused of the small sample sizes of several chosen investigations for this meta‐analysis, care must be exercised when dealing with its values.