Cargando…
How are countries responding differently to COVID-19: a systematic review of guidelines on isolation measures
INTRODUCTION: Isolation strategies have been implemented in numerous countries worldwide during the ongoing community transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). However, various countries and organizations have implemented their isolation measures at varying intens...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10502310/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37719732 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1190519 |
_version_ | 1785106294588309504 |
---|---|
author | Xie, Guangmei Wang, Li Zhang, Jun |
author_facet | Xie, Guangmei Wang, Li Zhang, Jun |
author_sort | Xie, Guangmei |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Isolation strategies have been implemented in numerous countries worldwide during the ongoing community transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). However, various countries and organizations have implemented their isolation measures at varying intensities, even during the same period. Therefore, we systematically reviewed the key information contained in currently available guidelines regarding the isolation of the general population, aiming to better identify the heterogeneity of the current isolation strategies. METHODS: We conducted searches in four evidence-based medicine (EBM) databases and five guideline websites to identify guidelines, guidance, protocols, and policy documents published by authoritative advisory bodies or healthcare organizations, which provided information on the implementation of isolation for general populations with COVID-19. One author extracted data using a standardized data extraction checklist, and a second author double-checked all extractions for completeness and correctness. Discrepancies were resolved through discussion. The information extracted from the included articles was summarized both narratively and using tables. RESULTS: We included 15 articles that provided information on isolation measures recommended by nine different countries and organizations. The included articles consistently recommended isolating individuals with a positive COVID-19 test, regardless of the presence of symptoms. However, there were variations in the duration of isolation, and substantial differences also existed in the criteria for ending the isolation of COVID-19 patients. CONCLUSION: Different countries and organizations have substantial differences in their isolation policies. This reminds us that scientifically sound guidelines on isolation that balance the risk of prematurely ending isolation with the burden of prolonged isolation are a crucial topic of discussion when faced with a pandemic. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10502310 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105023102023-09-16 How are countries responding differently to COVID-19: a systematic review of guidelines on isolation measures Xie, Guangmei Wang, Li Zhang, Jun Front Public Health Public Health INTRODUCTION: Isolation strategies have been implemented in numerous countries worldwide during the ongoing community transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). However, various countries and organizations have implemented their isolation measures at varying intensities, even during the same period. Therefore, we systematically reviewed the key information contained in currently available guidelines regarding the isolation of the general population, aiming to better identify the heterogeneity of the current isolation strategies. METHODS: We conducted searches in four evidence-based medicine (EBM) databases and five guideline websites to identify guidelines, guidance, protocols, and policy documents published by authoritative advisory bodies or healthcare organizations, which provided information on the implementation of isolation for general populations with COVID-19. One author extracted data using a standardized data extraction checklist, and a second author double-checked all extractions for completeness and correctness. Discrepancies were resolved through discussion. The information extracted from the included articles was summarized both narratively and using tables. RESULTS: We included 15 articles that provided information on isolation measures recommended by nine different countries and organizations. The included articles consistently recommended isolating individuals with a positive COVID-19 test, regardless of the presence of symptoms. However, there were variations in the duration of isolation, and substantial differences also existed in the criteria for ending the isolation of COVID-19 patients. CONCLUSION: Different countries and organizations have substantial differences in their isolation policies. This reminds us that scientifically sound guidelines on isolation that balance the risk of prematurely ending isolation with the burden of prolonged isolation are a crucial topic of discussion when faced with a pandemic. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10502310/ /pubmed/37719732 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1190519 Text en Copyright © 2023 Xie, Wang and Zhang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Public Health Xie, Guangmei Wang, Li Zhang, Jun How are countries responding differently to COVID-19: a systematic review of guidelines on isolation measures |
title | How are countries responding differently to COVID-19: a systematic review of guidelines on isolation measures |
title_full | How are countries responding differently to COVID-19: a systematic review of guidelines on isolation measures |
title_fullStr | How are countries responding differently to COVID-19: a systematic review of guidelines on isolation measures |
title_full_unstemmed | How are countries responding differently to COVID-19: a systematic review of guidelines on isolation measures |
title_short | How are countries responding differently to COVID-19: a systematic review of guidelines on isolation measures |
title_sort | how are countries responding differently to covid-19: a systematic review of guidelines on isolation measures |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10502310/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37719732 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1190519 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xieguangmei howarecountriesrespondingdifferentlytocovid19asystematicreviewofguidelinesonisolationmeasures AT wangli howarecountriesrespondingdifferentlytocovid19asystematicreviewofguidelinesonisolationmeasures AT zhangjun howarecountriesrespondingdifferentlytocovid19asystematicreviewofguidelinesonisolationmeasures |