Cargando…

Use of polymyxin B with different administration methods in the critically ill patients with ventilation associated pneumonia: a single-center experience

Background: Whether nebulized polymyxin B should be used as an adjunctive therapy or substitution strategy to intravenous polymyxin B for the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) remains controversial. This study’s aim is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different administration...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shi, Rupeng, Fu, Yuanyuan, Gan, Yujing, Wu, Danying, Zhou, Suming, Huang, Min
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10502420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37719858
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2023.1222044
_version_ 1785106320023617536
author Shi, Rupeng
Fu, Yuanyuan
Gan, Yujing
Wu, Danying
Zhou, Suming
Huang, Min
author_facet Shi, Rupeng
Fu, Yuanyuan
Gan, Yujing
Wu, Danying
Zhou, Suming
Huang, Min
author_sort Shi, Rupeng
collection PubMed
description Background: Whether nebulized polymyxin B should be used as an adjunctive therapy or substitution strategy to intravenous polymyxin B for the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) remains controversial. This study’s aim is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different administration ways of polymyxin B in the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by extensively drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria(XDR-GNB). Methods: This retrospective cohort study enrolled ventilator-associated pneumonia patients caused by XDR-GNB treated with polymyxin B in the intensive care unit. Patients were categorized by the administration methods as intravenous (IV) group, inhaled (IH) group, and the intravenous combined with inhaled (IV + IH) group. Microbiological outcome and clinical outcome were compared in each group. The side effects were also explored. Results: A total of 111 patients were enrolled and there was no difference in demographic and clinical characteristics among the three groups. In terms of efficacy, clinical cure or improvement was achieved in 21 patients (55.3%) in the intravenous group, 19 patients (50%) in the IH group, and 20 patients (57.1%) in IV + IH group (p = 0.815). All three groups showed high success rates in microbiological eradication, as 29 patients with negative cultures after medication in inhaled group. Among all the patients who had negative bacterial cultures after polymyxin B, the inhaled group had significantly shorter clearance time than the intravenous group (p = 0.002), but with no significant difference in 28-day mortality. Compared with intravenous group, a trend towards a lower risk of acute kidney injury was observed in inhaled group (p = 0.025). Conclusion: From the perspective of minimal systemic renal toxicity, nebulized polymyxin B as a substitution strategy to intravenous polymyxin B for the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by XDR-GNB is feasible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10502420
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105024202023-09-16 Use of polymyxin B with different administration methods in the critically ill patients with ventilation associated pneumonia: a single-center experience Shi, Rupeng Fu, Yuanyuan Gan, Yujing Wu, Danying Zhou, Suming Huang, Min Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Background: Whether nebulized polymyxin B should be used as an adjunctive therapy or substitution strategy to intravenous polymyxin B for the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) remains controversial. This study’s aim is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different administration ways of polymyxin B in the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by extensively drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria(XDR-GNB). Methods: This retrospective cohort study enrolled ventilator-associated pneumonia patients caused by XDR-GNB treated with polymyxin B in the intensive care unit. Patients were categorized by the administration methods as intravenous (IV) group, inhaled (IH) group, and the intravenous combined with inhaled (IV + IH) group. Microbiological outcome and clinical outcome were compared in each group. The side effects were also explored. Results: A total of 111 patients were enrolled and there was no difference in demographic and clinical characteristics among the three groups. In terms of efficacy, clinical cure or improvement was achieved in 21 patients (55.3%) in the intravenous group, 19 patients (50%) in the IH group, and 20 patients (57.1%) in IV + IH group (p = 0.815). All three groups showed high success rates in microbiological eradication, as 29 patients with negative cultures after medication in inhaled group. Among all the patients who had negative bacterial cultures after polymyxin B, the inhaled group had significantly shorter clearance time than the intravenous group (p = 0.002), but with no significant difference in 28-day mortality. Compared with intravenous group, a trend towards a lower risk of acute kidney injury was observed in inhaled group (p = 0.025). Conclusion: From the perspective of minimal systemic renal toxicity, nebulized polymyxin B as a substitution strategy to intravenous polymyxin B for the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by XDR-GNB is feasible. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10502420/ /pubmed/37719858 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2023.1222044 Text en Copyright © 2023 Shi, Fu, Gan, Wu, Zhou and Huang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pharmacology
Shi, Rupeng
Fu, Yuanyuan
Gan, Yujing
Wu, Danying
Zhou, Suming
Huang, Min
Use of polymyxin B with different administration methods in the critically ill patients with ventilation associated pneumonia: a single-center experience
title Use of polymyxin B with different administration methods in the critically ill patients with ventilation associated pneumonia: a single-center experience
title_full Use of polymyxin B with different administration methods in the critically ill patients with ventilation associated pneumonia: a single-center experience
title_fullStr Use of polymyxin B with different administration methods in the critically ill patients with ventilation associated pneumonia: a single-center experience
title_full_unstemmed Use of polymyxin B with different administration methods in the critically ill patients with ventilation associated pneumonia: a single-center experience
title_short Use of polymyxin B with different administration methods in the critically ill patients with ventilation associated pneumonia: a single-center experience
title_sort use of polymyxin b with different administration methods in the critically ill patients with ventilation associated pneumonia: a single-center experience
topic Pharmacology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10502420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37719858
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2023.1222044
work_keys_str_mv AT shirupeng useofpolymyxinbwithdifferentadministrationmethodsinthecriticallyillpatientswithventilationassociatedpneumoniaasinglecenterexperience
AT fuyuanyuan useofpolymyxinbwithdifferentadministrationmethodsinthecriticallyillpatientswithventilationassociatedpneumoniaasinglecenterexperience
AT ganyujing useofpolymyxinbwithdifferentadministrationmethodsinthecriticallyillpatientswithventilationassociatedpneumoniaasinglecenterexperience
AT wudanying useofpolymyxinbwithdifferentadministrationmethodsinthecriticallyillpatientswithventilationassociatedpneumoniaasinglecenterexperience
AT zhousuming useofpolymyxinbwithdifferentadministrationmethodsinthecriticallyillpatientswithventilationassociatedpneumoniaasinglecenterexperience
AT huangmin useofpolymyxinbwithdifferentadministrationmethodsinthecriticallyillpatientswithventilationassociatedpneumoniaasinglecenterexperience