Cargando…

Rationale and Design of the Randomized Bayesian Multicenter COME-TAVI Trial in Patients With a New Onset Left Bundle Branch Block

Patients with new-onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are at risk of developing delayed high-degree atrioventricular block. Management of new-onset LBBB post-TAVI remains controversial. In the Comparison of a Clinical Monitoring Strategy Versus...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rivard, Lena, Nault, Isabelle, Krahn, Andrew D., Daneault, Benoit, Roux, Jean-Francois, Natarajan, Madhu, Healey, Jeffrey S., Quadros, Kenneth, Sandhu, Roopinder K., Kouz, Remi, Greiss, Isabelle, Leong-Sit, Peter, Gourraud, Jean Baptiste, Ben Ali, Walid, Asgar, Anita, Aguilar, Martin, Bonan, Raoul, Cadrin-Tourigny, Julia, Cartier, Raymond, Dorval, Jean-Francois, Dubuc, Marc, Dürrleman, Nicolas, Dyrda, Katia, Guerra, Peter, Ibrahim, Marina, Ibrahim, Reda, Macle, Laurent, Mondesert, Blandine, Moss, Emmanuel, Raymond-Paquin, Alexandre, Roy, Denis, Tadros, Rafik, Thibault, Bernard, Talajic, Mario, Nozza, Anna, Guertin, Marie-Claude, Khairy, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10502429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37720184
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjco.2023.05.009
Descripción
Sumario:Patients with new-onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are at risk of developing delayed high-degree atrioventricular block. Management of new-onset LBBB post-TAVI remains controversial. In the Comparison of a Clinical Monitoring Strategy Versus Electrophysiology-Guided Algorithmic Approach in Patients With a New LBBB After TAVI (COME-TAVI) trial, consenting patients with new-onset LBBB that persists on day 2 after TAVI, meeting exclusion/inclusion criteria, are randomized to an electrophysiological study (EPS)-guided approach or 30-day electrocardiographic monitoring. In the EPS-guided approach, patients with a His to ventricle (HV) interval ≥ 65 ms undergo permanent pacemaker implantation. Patients randomized to noninvasive monitoring receive a wearable continuous electrocardiographic recording and transmitting device for 30 days. Follow-up will be performed at 3, 6, and 12 months. The primary endpoint is a composite outcome designed to capture net clinical benefit. The endpoint incorporates major consequences of both strategies in patients with new-onset LBBB after TAVI, as follows: (i) sudden cardiac death; (ii) syncope; (iii) atrioventricular conduction disorder requiring a pacemaker (for a class I or IIa indication); and (iv) complications related to the pacemaker or EPS. The trial incorporates a Bayesian design with a noninformative prior, outcome-adaptive randomization (initially 1:1), and 2 prespecified interim analyses once 25% and 50% of the anticipated number of primary endpoints are reached. The trial is event-driven, with an anticipated upper limit of 452 patients required to reach 77 primary outcome events over 12 months of follow-up. In summary, the aim of this Bayesian multicentre randomized trial is to compare 2 management strategies in patients with new-onset LBBB post-TAVI—an EPS-guided approach vs noninvasive 30-day monitoring. Trial registration number: NCT03303612.