Cargando…
Distinct Fluorescence Optical Imaging Patient Clusters Emerge for Seropositive and Seronegative Rheumatoid Arthritis
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether digital activity fluorescence optical imaging (FOI) patterns of inflammation can identify distinct rheumatoid arthritis (RA) phenotypes. METHODS: The hands of newly diagnosed patients with RA were evaluated by clinical examination, musculoskeletal ultrasound, and FO...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10502810/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37551033 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11599 |
Sumario: | OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether digital activity fluorescence optical imaging (FOI) patterns of inflammation can identify distinct rheumatoid arthritis (RA) phenotypes. METHODS: The hands of newly diagnosed patients with RA were evaluated by clinical examination, musculoskeletal ultrasound, and FOI. Inflammation on FOI was defined when capillary leakage and/or fluorophore perfusion was present. The FOI composite image was quantified into a digital disease activity (DACT) score, using novel computerized algorithms. Unsupervised clustering on FOI inflammatory patterns was used to identify subgroups of patients relative to anticyclic citrullinated peptides (ACPA) and/or rheumatoid factor (RF). RESULTS: Of 1326 examined hand joints in 39 patients with RA (72% female; 56% ever‐smokers; 54% RF positive and 69% ACPA positive), 400 (30%) showed inflammation by FOI, and 95% (37 of 39) of patients had DACT‐FOI scores greater than 1. Unsupervised analysis on FOI patterns revealed two patient clusters, cluster 1 (n = 29) and cluster 2 (n = 10). The proportion of seropositive patients was significantly higher in cluster 1 versus cluster 2 (90%, 26 of 29 vs. 30%, 3 of 10; P < 0.01), whereas C‐reactive‐protein levels (minimum‐maximum) were significantly higher in cluster 2 (20 mg/l [1‐102]) versus cluster 1 (2 mg/l [0‐119]; P = 0.01). A wider variety and proportion of inflamed joints emerged for patients with RA in cluster 2 versus cluster 1, in which inflammation was more concentrated around the wrists and the right metacarpophalangeal 2 (MCP2), bilateral MCP3, and, to a lesser degree, left MCP2 and proximal interphalangeal joint and tendon regions. Cluster 1 displayed lower mean (±SD) DACT scores compared with cluster 2 (3.6 ± 2.1 vs. 5.4 ± 2.1; P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: FOI‐based digital quantification of hand joint inflammation revealed two distinct RA subpopulations with and without ACPA and RF related autoantibodies. |
---|