Cargando…
METACARPAL FRACTURES TREATMENT: COMPARASION BETWEEN KIRSCHNER WIRE AND INTRAMEDULLARY SCREW
INTRODUCTION: Metacarpal fractures are common and can be treated surgically using Kirschner wires (K-wires) or intramedullary fixation with compression screws (IMCS). OBJECTIVES: Analyze the postsurgical results from treating the metacarpal extra-articular fractures through the retrograde Kirschner...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
ATHA EDITORA
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10502975/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37720810 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220233103e266948 |
_version_ | 1785106423760289792 |
---|---|
author | de Jesus, Bruno Cesar Silva da Silva, Clóvis Rodrigo Guimarães Braz Pereira Cardoso, Rodrigo Domiciano Mauad, Vitor Augusto Queiroz Alves, Rafael Saleme Pinto, Fernando Nogueira Zambone |
author_facet | de Jesus, Bruno Cesar Silva da Silva, Clóvis Rodrigo Guimarães Braz Pereira Cardoso, Rodrigo Domiciano Mauad, Vitor Augusto Queiroz Alves, Rafael Saleme Pinto, Fernando Nogueira Zambone |
author_sort | de Jesus, Bruno Cesar Silva |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Metacarpal fractures are common and can be treated surgically using Kirschner wires (K-wires) or intramedullary fixation with compression screws (IMCS). OBJECTIVES: Analyze the postsurgical results from treating the metacarpal extra-articular fractures through the retrograde Kirschner wire technique, and compare it with the intramedullary compression screw fixation. Methods: Retrospective and quantitative studies were to analyze patients’ medical records, and a postsurgical evaluation questionnaire was given to the patients, who were divided into K-wire and IMCS. RESULTS: The period of immobilization with a splint took six weeks for the K-wire group and four weeks for the IMCS group. The average time for consolidation took, respectively, fifty-seven days and forty-seven days. The first group could restart their activities twenty-two days after the other, and the average force value of the treated hand, when compared with its contralateral, was 93.9% and 95.4%, respectively. Between the operated hand and its contralateral, there was a difference of 16° in the total measures of the metacarpophalangeal and interphalangeal joint's range of movement among the K-wire group and 5° among the IMCS group. CONCLUSION: The patients who participated in this study showed excellent results after surgery, and both treatments were proven to be safe and reliable. Evidence level III; Retrospective comparative study . |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10502975 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | ATHA EDITORA |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105029752023-09-16 METACARPAL FRACTURES TREATMENT: COMPARASION BETWEEN KIRSCHNER WIRE AND INTRAMEDULLARY SCREW de Jesus, Bruno Cesar Silva da Silva, Clóvis Rodrigo Guimarães Braz Pereira Cardoso, Rodrigo Domiciano Mauad, Vitor Augusto Queiroz Alves, Rafael Saleme Pinto, Fernando Nogueira Zambone Acta Ortop Bras Original Article INTRODUCTION: Metacarpal fractures are common and can be treated surgically using Kirschner wires (K-wires) or intramedullary fixation with compression screws (IMCS). OBJECTIVES: Analyze the postsurgical results from treating the metacarpal extra-articular fractures through the retrograde Kirschner wire technique, and compare it with the intramedullary compression screw fixation. Methods: Retrospective and quantitative studies were to analyze patients’ medical records, and a postsurgical evaluation questionnaire was given to the patients, who were divided into K-wire and IMCS. RESULTS: The period of immobilization with a splint took six weeks for the K-wire group and four weeks for the IMCS group. The average time for consolidation took, respectively, fifty-seven days and forty-seven days. The first group could restart their activities twenty-two days after the other, and the average force value of the treated hand, when compared with its contralateral, was 93.9% and 95.4%, respectively. Between the operated hand and its contralateral, there was a difference of 16° in the total measures of the metacarpophalangeal and interphalangeal joint's range of movement among the K-wire group and 5° among the IMCS group. CONCLUSION: The patients who participated in this study showed excellent results after surgery, and both treatments were proven to be safe and reliable. Evidence level III; Retrospective comparative study . ATHA EDITORA 2023-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10502975/ /pubmed/37720810 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220233103e266948 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article de Jesus, Bruno Cesar Silva da Silva, Clóvis Rodrigo Guimarães Braz Pereira Cardoso, Rodrigo Domiciano Mauad, Vitor Augusto Queiroz Alves, Rafael Saleme Pinto, Fernando Nogueira Zambone METACARPAL FRACTURES TREATMENT: COMPARASION BETWEEN KIRSCHNER WIRE AND INTRAMEDULLARY SCREW |
title | METACARPAL FRACTURES TREATMENT: COMPARASION BETWEEN KIRSCHNER WIRE AND INTRAMEDULLARY SCREW |
title_full | METACARPAL FRACTURES TREATMENT: COMPARASION BETWEEN KIRSCHNER WIRE AND INTRAMEDULLARY SCREW |
title_fullStr | METACARPAL FRACTURES TREATMENT: COMPARASION BETWEEN KIRSCHNER WIRE AND INTRAMEDULLARY SCREW |
title_full_unstemmed | METACARPAL FRACTURES TREATMENT: COMPARASION BETWEEN KIRSCHNER WIRE AND INTRAMEDULLARY SCREW |
title_short | METACARPAL FRACTURES TREATMENT: COMPARASION BETWEEN KIRSCHNER WIRE AND INTRAMEDULLARY SCREW |
title_sort | metacarpal fractures treatment: comparasion between kirschner wire and intramedullary screw |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10502975/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37720810 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220233103e266948 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dejesusbrunocesarsilva metacarpalfracturestreatmentcomparasionbetweenkirschnerwireandintramedullaryscrew AT dasilvaclovisrodrigoguimaraesbrazpereira metacarpalfracturestreatmentcomparasionbetweenkirschnerwireandintramedullaryscrew AT cardosorodrigodomiciano metacarpalfracturestreatmentcomparasionbetweenkirschnerwireandintramedullaryscrew AT mauadvitoraugustoqueiroz metacarpalfracturestreatmentcomparasionbetweenkirschnerwireandintramedullaryscrew AT alvesrafaelsaleme metacarpalfracturestreatmentcomparasionbetweenkirschnerwireandintramedullaryscrew AT pintofernandonogueirazambone metacarpalfracturestreatmentcomparasionbetweenkirschnerwireandintramedullaryscrew |