Cargando…

Construction of a prediction model for rebleeding in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding

BACKGROUND: The incidence of rebleeding in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) remains despite advances in intervention approaches. Therefore, early prediction of the risk of rebleeding could help to greatly reduce the mortality rate in these patients. We aim to develop and validate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhuang, Yangping, Xia, Shaohuai, Chen, Junwei, Ke, Jun, Lin, Shirong, Lin, Qingming, Tang, Xiahong, Huang, Hanlin, Zheng, Nan, Wang, Yi, Chen, Feng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10502990/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37715244
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-023-01349-3
_version_ 1785106427298185216
author Zhuang, Yangping
Xia, Shaohuai
Chen, Junwei
Ke, Jun
Lin, Shirong
Lin, Qingming
Tang, Xiahong
Huang, Hanlin
Zheng, Nan
Wang, Yi
Chen, Feng
author_facet Zhuang, Yangping
Xia, Shaohuai
Chen, Junwei
Ke, Jun
Lin, Shirong
Lin, Qingming
Tang, Xiahong
Huang, Hanlin
Zheng, Nan
Wang, Yi
Chen, Feng
author_sort Zhuang, Yangping
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The incidence of rebleeding in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) remains despite advances in intervention approaches. Therefore, early prediction of the risk of rebleeding could help to greatly reduce the mortality rate in these patients. We aim to develop and validate a new prediction model to predict the probability of rebleeding in patients with AUGIB. METHODS: A total of 1170 AUGIB patients who completed the procedure of emergency gastroscopy within 48 h of admission were included. Logistic regression analyses were performed to construct a new prediction model. A receiver operating characteristic curve, a line graph, and a calibration and decision curve were used to assess the predictive performance of our new prediction model and compare its performance with that of the AIMS65 scoring system to determine the predictive value of our prediction model. RESULTS: A new prediction model was constructed based on Lactic acid (LAC), neutrophil percentage (NEUTP), platelet (PLT), albumin (ALB), and D-DIMER. The AUC values and their 95% confidence interval (CI) for the new prediction model and the AIMS65 score were 0.746 and 0.619, respectively, and 0.697–0.795 and 0.567–0.670, respectively. In the training group, the C index values based on the prediction model and the AIMS65 scoring system were 0.720 and 0.610, respectively. In the validation group, the C index values based on the prediction model and the AIMS65 scoring system were 0.828 and 0.667, respectively. The decision and calibration curve analysis also showed that the prediction model was superior to the AIMS65 scoring system in terms of accuracy of prediction, consistency, and net clinical benefit. CONCLUSION: The prediction model can predict the probability of rebleeding in AUGIB patients after endoscopic hemostasis therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10502990
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105029902023-09-16 Construction of a prediction model for rebleeding in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding Zhuang, Yangping Xia, Shaohuai Chen, Junwei Ke, Jun Lin, Shirong Lin, Qingming Tang, Xiahong Huang, Hanlin Zheng, Nan Wang, Yi Chen, Feng Eur J Med Res Research BACKGROUND: The incidence of rebleeding in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) remains despite advances in intervention approaches. Therefore, early prediction of the risk of rebleeding could help to greatly reduce the mortality rate in these patients. We aim to develop and validate a new prediction model to predict the probability of rebleeding in patients with AUGIB. METHODS: A total of 1170 AUGIB patients who completed the procedure of emergency gastroscopy within 48 h of admission were included. Logistic regression analyses were performed to construct a new prediction model. A receiver operating characteristic curve, a line graph, and a calibration and decision curve were used to assess the predictive performance of our new prediction model and compare its performance with that of the AIMS65 scoring system to determine the predictive value of our prediction model. RESULTS: A new prediction model was constructed based on Lactic acid (LAC), neutrophil percentage (NEUTP), platelet (PLT), albumin (ALB), and D-DIMER. The AUC values and their 95% confidence interval (CI) for the new prediction model and the AIMS65 score were 0.746 and 0.619, respectively, and 0.697–0.795 and 0.567–0.670, respectively. In the training group, the C index values based on the prediction model and the AIMS65 scoring system were 0.720 and 0.610, respectively. In the validation group, the C index values based on the prediction model and the AIMS65 scoring system were 0.828 and 0.667, respectively. The decision and calibration curve analysis also showed that the prediction model was superior to the AIMS65 scoring system in terms of accuracy of prediction, consistency, and net clinical benefit. CONCLUSION: The prediction model can predict the probability of rebleeding in AUGIB patients after endoscopic hemostasis therapy. BioMed Central 2023-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10502990/ /pubmed/37715244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-023-01349-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Zhuang, Yangping
Xia, Shaohuai
Chen, Junwei
Ke, Jun
Lin, Shirong
Lin, Qingming
Tang, Xiahong
Huang, Hanlin
Zheng, Nan
Wang, Yi
Chen, Feng
Construction of a prediction model for rebleeding in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding
title Construction of a prediction model for rebleeding in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding
title_full Construction of a prediction model for rebleeding in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding
title_fullStr Construction of a prediction model for rebleeding in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding
title_full_unstemmed Construction of a prediction model for rebleeding in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding
title_short Construction of a prediction model for rebleeding in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding
title_sort construction of a prediction model for rebleeding in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10502990/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37715244
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-023-01349-3
work_keys_str_mv AT zhuangyangping constructionofapredictionmodelforrebleedinginpatientswithacuteuppergastrointestinalbleeding
AT xiashaohuai constructionofapredictionmodelforrebleedinginpatientswithacuteuppergastrointestinalbleeding
AT chenjunwei constructionofapredictionmodelforrebleedinginpatientswithacuteuppergastrointestinalbleeding
AT kejun constructionofapredictionmodelforrebleedinginpatientswithacuteuppergastrointestinalbleeding
AT linshirong constructionofapredictionmodelforrebleedinginpatientswithacuteuppergastrointestinalbleeding
AT linqingming constructionofapredictionmodelforrebleedinginpatientswithacuteuppergastrointestinalbleeding
AT tangxiahong constructionofapredictionmodelforrebleedinginpatientswithacuteuppergastrointestinalbleeding
AT huanghanlin constructionofapredictionmodelforrebleedinginpatientswithacuteuppergastrointestinalbleeding
AT zhengnan constructionofapredictionmodelforrebleedinginpatientswithacuteuppergastrointestinalbleeding
AT wangyi constructionofapredictionmodelforrebleedinginpatientswithacuteuppergastrointestinalbleeding
AT chenfeng constructionofapredictionmodelforrebleedinginpatientswithacuteuppergastrointestinalbleeding