Cargando…

Using patient comments from a standardised experience survey to investigate their perceptions and prioritise improvement actions: a thematic and syntactic analysis

BACKGROUND: Although patient experience surveys flourish in many countries with the aim to improve quality of care, questions remain concerning their ability to become effective drivers of change within institutions. The patient comments from the French national patient experience hospital survey we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Crubezy, Marion, Douay, Céline, Michel, Philippe, Haesebaert, Julie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10503051/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37710317
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09953-z
_version_ 1785106440635023360
author Crubezy, Marion
Douay, Céline
Michel, Philippe
Haesebaert, Julie
author_facet Crubezy, Marion
Douay, Céline
Michel, Philippe
Haesebaert, Julie
author_sort Crubezy, Marion
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although patient experience surveys flourish in many countries with the aim to improve quality of care, questions remain concerning their ability to become effective drivers of change within institutions. The patient comments from the French national patient experience hospital survey were analysed using an innovative structured approach to characterise patient experience and identify field actions for the institutions. METHODS: The comments were taken from the two open-ended questions comprised in the patient experience survey of the Hospices Civils de Lyon between 2018 and 2019. The comments analysis methodology consisted in three steps: thematic analysis; syntactic analysis; generation of statistics for the creation of a patient journey and prioritisation of sub-themes. The STROBE statement checklist was followed. RESULTS: Over a year, 79.7% of the 7 362 respondents left at least one comment at the end of the survey and were included in the study, for a total of 5 868 surveys and 10 061 comments. These led to the identification of 28 general themes and 184 specific sub-themes. From the patient journey created, 23 sub-themes were prioritised and gathered into four key categories: relationship between patient and staff; environment; surgery and pain management; information and care coordination. For each of them, the actions and expectations formulated by the respondents were described. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of patient comments obtained from a standardised survey allowed to characterise the patient journey using data that describes patient experience, enabling a prioritisation of actions aiming to improve practice and quality of care at the institution, department, and staff level. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-023-09953-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10503051
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105030512023-09-16 Using patient comments from a standardised experience survey to investigate their perceptions and prioritise improvement actions: a thematic and syntactic analysis Crubezy, Marion Douay, Céline Michel, Philippe Haesebaert, Julie BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Although patient experience surveys flourish in many countries with the aim to improve quality of care, questions remain concerning their ability to become effective drivers of change within institutions. The patient comments from the French national patient experience hospital survey were analysed using an innovative structured approach to characterise patient experience and identify field actions for the institutions. METHODS: The comments were taken from the two open-ended questions comprised in the patient experience survey of the Hospices Civils de Lyon between 2018 and 2019. The comments analysis methodology consisted in three steps: thematic analysis; syntactic analysis; generation of statistics for the creation of a patient journey and prioritisation of sub-themes. The STROBE statement checklist was followed. RESULTS: Over a year, 79.7% of the 7 362 respondents left at least one comment at the end of the survey and were included in the study, for a total of 5 868 surveys and 10 061 comments. These led to the identification of 28 general themes and 184 specific sub-themes. From the patient journey created, 23 sub-themes were prioritised and gathered into four key categories: relationship between patient and staff; environment; surgery and pain management; information and care coordination. For each of them, the actions and expectations formulated by the respondents were described. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of patient comments obtained from a standardised survey allowed to characterise the patient journey using data that describes patient experience, enabling a prioritisation of actions aiming to improve practice and quality of care at the institution, department, and staff level. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-023-09953-z. BioMed Central 2023-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10503051/ /pubmed/37710317 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09953-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Crubezy, Marion
Douay, Céline
Michel, Philippe
Haesebaert, Julie
Using patient comments from a standardised experience survey to investigate their perceptions and prioritise improvement actions: a thematic and syntactic analysis
title Using patient comments from a standardised experience survey to investigate their perceptions and prioritise improvement actions: a thematic and syntactic analysis
title_full Using patient comments from a standardised experience survey to investigate their perceptions and prioritise improvement actions: a thematic and syntactic analysis
title_fullStr Using patient comments from a standardised experience survey to investigate their perceptions and prioritise improvement actions: a thematic and syntactic analysis
title_full_unstemmed Using patient comments from a standardised experience survey to investigate their perceptions and prioritise improvement actions: a thematic and syntactic analysis
title_short Using patient comments from a standardised experience survey to investigate their perceptions and prioritise improvement actions: a thematic and syntactic analysis
title_sort using patient comments from a standardised experience survey to investigate their perceptions and prioritise improvement actions: a thematic and syntactic analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10503051/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37710317
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09953-z
work_keys_str_mv AT crubezymarion usingpatientcommentsfromastandardisedexperiencesurveytoinvestigatetheirperceptionsandprioritiseimprovementactionsathematicandsyntacticanalysis
AT douayceline usingpatientcommentsfromastandardisedexperiencesurveytoinvestigatetheirperceptionsandprioritiseimprovementactionsathematicandsyntacticanalysis
AT michelphilippe usingpatientcommentsfromastandardisedexperiencesurveytoinvestigatetheirperceptionsandprioritiseimprovementactionsathematicandsyntacticanalysis
AT haesebaertjulie usingpatientcommentsfromastandardisedexperiencesurveytoinvestigatetheirperceptionsandprioritiseimprovementactionsathematicandsyntacticanalysis