Cargando…
Using patient comments from a standardised experience survey to investigate their perceptions and prioritise improvement actions: a thematic and syntactic analysis
BACKGROUND: Although patient experience surveys flourish in many countries with the aim to improve quality of care, questions remain concerning their ability to become effective drivers of change within institutions. The patient comments from the French national patient experience hospital survey we...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10503051/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37710317 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09953-z |
_version_ | 1785106440635023360 |
---|---|
author | Crubezy, Marion Douay, Céline Michel, Philippe Haesebaert, Julie |
author_facet | Crubezy, Marion Douay, Céline Michel, Philippe Haesebaert, Julie |
author_sort | Crubezy, Marion |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Although patient experience surveys flourish in many countries with the aim to improve quality of care, questions remain concerning their ability to become effective drivers of change within institutions. The patient comments from the French national patient experience hospital survey were analysed using an innovative structured approach to characterise patient experience and identify field actions for the institutions. METHODS: The comments were taken from the two open-ended questions comprised in the patient experience survey of the Hospices Civils de Lyon between 2018 and 2019. The comments analysis methodology consisted in three steps: thematic analysis; syntactic analysis; generation of statistics for the creation of a patient journey and prioritisation of sub-themes. The STROBE statement checklist was followed. RESULTS: Over a year, 79.7% of the 7 362 respondents left at least one comment at the end of the survey and were included in the study, for a total of 5 868 surveys and 10 061 comments. These led to the identification of 28 general themes and 184 specific sub-themes. From the patient journey created, 23 sub-themes were prioritised and gathered into four key categories: relationship between patient and staff; environment; surgery and pain management; information and care coordination. For each of them, the actions and expectations formulated by the respondents were described. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of patient comments obtained from a standardised survey allowed to characterise the patient journey using data that describes patient experience, enabling a prioritisation of actions aiming to improve practice and quality of care at the institution, department, and staff level. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-023-09953-z. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10503051 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105030512023-09-16 Using patient comments from a standardised experience survey to investigate their perceptions and prioritise improvement actions: a thematic and syntactic analysis Crubezy, Marion Douay, Céline Michel, Philippe Haesebaert, Julie BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Although patient experience surveys flourish in many countries with the aim to improve quality of care, questions remain concerning their ability to become effective drivers of change within institutions. The patient comments from the French national patient experience hospital survey were analysed using an innovative structured approach to characterise patient experience and identify field actions for the institutions. METHODS: The comments were taken from the two open-ended questions comprised in the patient experience survey of the Hospices Civils de Lyon between 2018 and 2019. The comments analysis methodology consisted in three steps: thematic analysis; syntactic analysis; generation of statistics for the creation of a patient journey and prioritisation of sub-themes. The STROBE statement checklist was followed. RESULTS: Over a year, 79.7% of the 7 362 respondents left at least one comment at the end of the survey and were included in the study, for a total of 5 868 surveys and 10 061 comments. These led to the identification of 28 general themes and 184 specific sub-themes. From the patient journey created, 23 sub-themes were prioritised and gathered into four key categories: relationship between patient and staff; environment; surgery and pain management; information and care coordination. For each of them, the actions and expectations formulated by the respondents were described. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of patient comments obtained from a standardised survey allowed to characterise the patient journey using data that describes patient experience, enabling a prioritisation of actions aiming to improve practice and quality of care at the institution, department, and staff level. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-023-09953-z. BioMed Central 2023-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10503051/ /pubmed/37710317 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09953-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Crubezy, Marion Douay, Céline Michel, Philippe Haesebaert, Julie Using patient comments from a standardised experience survey to investigate their perceptions and prioritise improvement actions: a thematic and syntactic analysis |
title | Using patient comments from a standardised experience survey to investigate their perceptions and prioritise improvement actions: a thematic and syntactic analysis |
title_full | Using patient comments from a standardised experience survey to investigate their perceptions and prioritise improvement actions: a thematic and syntactic analysis |
title_fullStr | Using patient comments from a standardised experience survey to investigate their perceptions and prioritise improvement actions: a thematic and syntactic analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Using patient comments from a standardised experience survey to investigate their perceptions and prioritise improvement actions: a thematic and syntactic analysis |
title_short | Using patient comments from a standardised experience survey to investigate their perceptions and prioritise improvement actions: a thematic and syntactic analysis |
title_sort | using patient comments from a standardised experience survey to investigate their perceptions and prioritise improvement actions: a thematic and syntactic analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10503051/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37710317 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09953-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT crubezymarion usingpatientcommentsfromastandardisedexperiencesurveytoinvestigatetheirperceptionsandprioritiseimprovementactionsathematicandsyntacticanalysis AT douayceline usingpatientcommentsfromastandardisedexperiencesurveytoinvestigatetheirperceptionsandprioritiseimprovementactionsathematicandsyntacticanalysis AT michelphilippe usingpatientcommentsfromastandardisedexperiencesurveytoinvestigatetheirperceptionsandprioritiseimprovementactionsathematicandsyntacticanalysis AT haesebaertjulie usingpatientcommentsfromastandardisedexperiencesurveytoinvestigatetheirperceptionsandprioritiseimprovementactionsathematicandsyntacticanalysis |