Cargando…

Development and validation of a deep learning-based automatic segmentation model for assessing intracranial volume: comparison with NeuroQuant, FreeSurfer, and SynthSeg

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To develop and validate a deep learning-based automatic segmentation model for assessing intracranial volume (ICV) and to compare the accuracy determined by NeuroQuant (NQ), FreeSurfer (FS), and SynthSeg. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 60 subjects [3...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Suh, Pae Sun, Jung, Wooseok, Suh, Chong Hyun, Kim, Jinyoung, Oh, Jio, Heo, Hwon, Shim, Woo Hyun, Lim, Jae-Sung, Lee, Jae-Hong, Kim, Ho Sung, Kim, Sang Joon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10503131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37719763
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1221892
_version_ 1785106459884781568
author Suh, Pae Sun
Jung, Wooseok
Suh, Chong Hyun
Kim, Jinyoung
Oh, Jio
Heo, Hwon
Shim, Woo Hyun
Lim, Jae-Sung
Lee, Jae-Hong
Kim, Ho Sung
Kim, Sang Joon
author_facet Suh, Pae Sun
Jung, Wooseok
Suh, Chong Hyun
Kim, Jinyoung
Oh, Jio
Heo, Hwon
Shim, Woo Hyun
Lim, Jae-Sung
Lee, Jae-Hong
Kim, Ho Sung
Kim, Sang Joon
author_sort Suh, Pae Sun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To develop and validate a deep learning-based automatic segmentation model for assessing intracranial volume (ICV) and to compare the accuracy determined by NeuroQuant (NQ), FreeSurfer (FS), and SynthSeg. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 60 subjects [30 Alzheimer’s disease (AD), 21 mild cognitive impairment (MCI), 9 cognitively normal (CN)] from a single tertiary hospital for the training and validation group (50:10). The test group included 40 subjects (20 AD, 10 MCI, 10 CN) from the ADNI dataset. We propose a robust ICV segmentation model based on the foundational 2D UNet architecture trained with four types of input images (both single and multimodality using scaled or unscaled T1-weighted and T2-FLAIR MR images). To compare with our model, NQ, FS, and SynthSeg were also utilized in the test group. We evaluated the model performance by measuring the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and average volume difference. RESULTS: The single-modality model trained with scaled T1-weighted images showed excellent performance with a DSC of 0.989 ± 0.002 and an average volume difference of 0.46% ± 0.38%. Our multimodality model trained with both unscaled T1-weighted and T2-FLAIR images showed similar performance with a DSC of 0.988 ± 0.002 and an average volume difference of 0.47% ± 0.35%. The overall average volume difference with our model showed relatively higher accuracy than NQ (2.15% ± 1.72%), FS (3.69% ± 2.93%), and SynthSeg (1.88% ± 1.18%). Furthermore, our model outperformed the three others in each subgroup of patients with AD, MCI, and CN subjects. CONCLUSION: Our deep learning-based automatic ICV segmentation model showed excellent performance for the automatic evaluation of ICV.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10503131
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105031312023-09-16 Development and validation of a deep learning-based automatic segmentation model for assessing intracranial volume: comparison with NeuroQuant, FreeSurfer, and SynthSeg Suh, Pae Sun Jung, Wooseok Suh, Chong Hyun Kim, Jinyoung Oh, Jio Heo, Hwon Shim, Woo Hyun Lim, Jae-Sung Lee, Jae-Hong Kim, Ho Sung Kim, Sang Joon Front Neurol Neurology BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To develop and validate a deep learning-based automatic segmentation model for assessing intracranial volume (ICV) and to compare the accuracy determined by NeuroQuant (NQ), FreeSurfer (FS), and SynthSeg. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 60 subjects [30 Alzheimer’s disease (AD), 21 mild cognitive impairment (MCI), 9 cognitively normal (CN)] from a single tertiary hospital for the training and validation group (50:10). The test group included 40 subjects (20 AD, 10 MCI, 10 CN) from the ADNI dataset. We propose a robust ICV segmentation model based on the foundational 2D UNet architecture trained with four types of input images (both single and multimodality using scaled or unscaled T1-weighted and T2-FLAIR MR images). To compare with our model, NQ, FS, and SynthSeg were also utilized in the test group. We evaluated the model performance by measuring the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and average volume difference. RESULTS: The single-modality model trained with scaled T1-weighted images showed excellent performance with a DSC of 0.989 ± 0.002 and an average volume difference of 0.46% ± 0.38%. Our multimodality model trained with both unscaled T1-weighted and T2-FLAIR images showed similar performance with a DSC of 0.988 ± 0.002 and an average volume difference of 0.47% ± 0.35%. The overall average volume difference with our model showed relatively higher accuracy than NQ (2.15% ± 1.72%), FS (3.69% ± 2.93%), and SynthSeg (1.88% ± 1.18%). Furthermore, our model outperformed the three others in each subgroup of patients with AD, MCI, and CN subjects. CONCLUSION: Our deep learning-based automatic ICV segmentation model showed excellent performance for the automatic evaluation of ICV. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10503131/ /pubmed/37719763 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1221892 Text en Copyright © 2023 Suh, Jung, Suh, Kim, Oh, Heo, Shim, Lim, Lee, Kim and Kim. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Suh, Pae Sun
Jung, Wooseok
Suh, Chong Hyun
Kim, Jinyoung
Oh, Jio
Heo, Hwon
Shim, Woo Hyun
Lim, Jae-Sung
Lee, Jae-Hong
Kim, Ho Sung
Kim, Sang Joon
Development and validation of a deep learning-based automatic segmentation model for assessing intracranial volume: comparison with NeuroQuant, FreeSurfer, and SynthSeg
title Development and validation of a deep learning-based automatic segmentation model for assessing intracranial volume: comparison with NeuroQuant, FreeSurfer, and SynthSeg
title_full Development and validation of a deep learning-based automatic segmentation model for assessing intracranial volume: comparison with NeuroQuant, FreeSurfer, and SynthSeg
title_fullStr Development and validation of a deep learning-based automatic segmentation model for assessing intracranial volume: comparison with NeuroQuant, FreeSurfer, and SynthSeg
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation of a deep learning-based automatic segmentation model for assessing intracranial volume: comparison with NeuroQuant, FreeSurfer, and SynthSeg
title_short Development and validation of a deep learning-based automatic segmentation model for assessing intracranial volume: comparison with NeuroQuant, FreeSurfer, and SynthSeg
title_sort development and validation of a deep learning-based automatic segmentation model for assessing intracranial volume: comparison with neuroquant, freesurfer, and synthseg
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10503131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37719763
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1221892
work_keys_str_mv AT suhpaesun developmentandvalidationofadeeplearningbasedautomaticsegmentationmodelforassessingintracranialvolumecomparisonwithneuroquantfreesurferandsynthseg
AT jungwooseok developmentandvalidationofadeeplearningbasedautomaticsegmentationmodelforassessingintracranialvolumecomparisonwithneuroquantfreesurferandsynthseg
AT suhchonghyun developmentandvalidationofadeeplearningbasedautomaticsegmentationmodelforassessingintracranialvolumecomparisonwithneuroquantfreesurferandsynthseg
AT kimjinyoung developmentandvalidationofadeeplearningbasedautomaticsegmentationmodelforassessingintracranialvolumecomparisonwithneuroquantfreesurferandsynthseg
AT ohjio developmentandvalidationofadeeplearningbasedautomaticsegmentationmodelforassessingintracranialvolumecomparisonwithneuroquantfreesurferandsynthseg
AT heohwon developmentandvalidationofadeeplearningbasedautomaticsegmentationmodelforassessingintracranialvolumecomparisonwithneuroquantfreesurferandsynthseg
AT shimwoohyun developmentandvalidationofadeeplearningbasedautomaticsegmentationmodelforassessingintracranialvolumecomparisonwithneuroquantfreesurferandsynthseg
AT limjaesung developmentandvalidationofadeeplearningbasedautomaticsegmentationmodelforassessingintracranialvolumecomparisonwithneuroquantfreesurferandsynthseg
AT leejaehong developmentandvalidationofadeeplearningbasedautomaticsegmentationmodelforassessingintracranialvolumecomparisonwithneuroquantfreesurferandsynthseg
AT kimhosung developmentandvalidationofadeeplearningbasedautomaticsegmentationmodelforassessingintracranialvolumecomparisonwithneuroquantfreesurferandsynthseg
AT kimsangjoon developmentandvalidationofadeeplearningbasedautomaticsegmentationmodelforassessingintracranialvolumecomparisonwithneuroquantfreesurferandsynthseg