Cargando…

Disparities in occupational health services: an international comparative study

BACKGROUND: Occupational Health Services (OHS) are comprehensive, multidisciplinary services supplied by various trained workers, including occupational physicians (OP), whose specialty is focused on workers’ health. AIMS: Our study questions are whether the OP/worker ratio may reflect the scope and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krakov, Ayala Olga, Zack, Oren, Sagiv, Oren Y., Slodownik, Dan, Raanan, Rachel, Alperovitch-Najenson, Deborah, Rinsky‑Halivni, Lilah, Moshe, Shlomo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10503138/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37710277
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12995-023-00386-2
_version_ 1785106461471277056
author Krakov, Ayala Olga
Zack, Oren
Sagiv, Oren Y.
Slodownik, Dan
Raanan, Rachel
Alperovitch-Najenson, Deborah
Rinsky‑Halivni, Lilah
Moshe, Shlomo
author_facet Krakov, Ayala Olga
Zack, Oren
Sagiv, Oren Y.
Slodownik, Dan
Raanan, Rachel
Alperovitch-Najenson, Deborah
Rinsky‑Halivni, Lilah
Moshe, Shlomo
author_sort Krakov, Ayala Olga
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Occupational Health Services (OHS) are comprehensive, multidisciplinary services supplied by various trained workers, including occupational physicians (OP), whose specialty is focused on workers’ health. AIMS: Our study questions are whether the OP/worker ratio may reflect the scope and availability of OHS. METHODS: This comparative study, conducted on globally different OHS, was based on literature analysis of peer-reviewed articles published in journals covering topics of occupational medicine and public health that addressed parameters on the type and scope of OHS provision. RESULTS: We described the number of OP/worker ratio, and the correlation to economic parameters (Gross domestic product—GDP, health expenditure, Gini Index—GI) by country. We found that among countries with a GDP per capita higher than US$30,000, only three (US, South Korea and Israel) had a very low OP/worker ratio (about 1:50,000 compared to 1:5,000 in other countries). Looking at all the countries together, there was a statistically significant negative correlation between health expenditure percentage of GDP per capita and OP/worker ratio (rs = -0.54, p = 0.01) and a significant positive correlation between GI and OP/worker ratio (rs = 0.47, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The lesser the percentage of health expenditure of GDP and the subsequent greater general inequality as reflected by the GI, the lower the OP/worker ratio. The data collected in our comparative study show that the OP/worker ratio is a parameter both easy to define and obtain which best represents the status and disparity of OHS in each country. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12995-023-00386-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10503138
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105031382023-09-16 Disparities in occupational health services: an international comparative study Krakov, Ayala Olga Zack, Oren Sagiv, Oren Y. Slodownik, Dan Raanan, Rachel Alperovitch-Najenson, Deborah Rinsky‑Halivni, Lilah Moshe, Shlomo J Occup Med Toxicol Research BACKGROUND: Occupational Health Services (OHS) are comprehensive, multidisciplinary services supplied by various trained workers, including occupational physicians (OP), whose specialty is focused on workers’ health. AIMS: Our study questions are whether the OP/worker ratio may reflect the scope and availability of OHS. METHODS: This comparative study, conducted on globally different OHS, was based on literature analysis of peer-reviewed articles published in journals covering topics of occupational medicine and public health that addressed parameters on the type and scope of OHS provision. RESULTS: We described the number of OP/worker ratio, and the correlation to economic parameters (Gross domestic product—GDP, health expenditure, Gini Index—GI) by country. We found that among countries with a GDP per capita higher than US$30,000, only three (US, South Korea and Israel) had a very low OP/worker ratio (about 1:50,000 compared to 1:5,000 in other countries). Looking at all the countries together, there was a statistically significant negative correlation between health expenditure percentage of GDP per capita and OP/worker ratio (rs = -0.54, p = 0.01) and a significant positive correlation between GI and OP/worker ratio (rs = 0.47, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The lesser the percentage of health expenditure of GDP and the subsequent greater general inequality as reflected by the GI, the lower the OP/worker ratio. The data collected in our comparative study show that the OP/worker ratio is a parameter both easy to define and obtain which best represents the status and disparity of OHS in each country. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12995-023-00386-2. BioMed Central 2023-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10503138/ /pubmed/37710277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12995-023-00386-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Krakov, Ayala Olga
Zack, Oren
Sagiv, Oren Y.
Slodownik, Dan
Raanan, Rachel
Alperovitch-Najenson, Deborah
Rinsky‑Halivni, Lilah
Moshe, Shlomo
Disparities in occupational health services: an international comparative study
title Disparities in occupational health services: an international comparative study
title_full Disparities in occupational health services: an international comparative study
title_fullStr Disparities in occupational health services: an international comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Disparities in occupational health services: an international comparative study
title_short Disparities in occupational health services: an international comparative study
title_sort disparities in occupational health services: an international comparative study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10503138/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37710277
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12995-023-00386-2
work_keys_str_mv AT krakovayalaolga disparitiesinoccupationalhealthservicesaninternationalcomparativestudy
AT zackoren disparitiesinoccupationalhealthservicesaninternationalcomparativestudy
AT sagivoreny disparitiesinoccupationalhealthservicesaninternationalcomparativestudy
AT slodownikdan disparitiesinoccupationalhealthservicesaninternationalcomparativestudy
AT raananrachel disparitiesinoccupationalhealthservicesaninternationalcomparativestudy
AT alperovitchnajensondeborah disparitiesinoccupationalhealthservicesaninternationalcomparativestudy
AT rinskyhalivnililah disparitiesinoccupationalhealthservicesaninternationalcomparativestudy
AT mosheshlomo disparitiesinoccupationalhealthservicesaninternationalcomparativestudy